Retired police officer visited by police for missing the A off Freda Wallace's first name

[Charabanc]

JFK, I would say you couldn't make this up, but you could. In fact you don't have to. We know it's been happening.

The usual suspects are involved. And hopefully, after Glinner's court case this week, their names and activities will become more well-known.

The former superintendent said police informed her that the home visit was related to a handful of social media posts about a transgender activist named Freda Wallace.

Ms Larkam had called the activist Fred, using the “dead” male name of the now transgender woman, and this act had been reported to the police.
...
It is believed that Ms Larkman was reported by a disgraced transgender police officer named Lynsay Watson – a figure with a history of urging the authorities to pursue criminal investigations of people who are critical of gender ideology.

Watson, born Alex Horwood, is believed to have also reported Linehan to the police over several social media posts last week.

https://archive.is/xzitf

ETA: Gah flipping MN link rendering! Got there in the end.

Just seeing if this works: ETA - it does! Here is the fragrant "Lynsay's" latest thrashing about, as he realises his power is waning in the disinfectant of sunlight:

SEEN Police Official Open Public Network
‪@seenpoliceuk.bsky.social‬
Former South Wales Police superintendent Catherine Larkman - recently retired to immediately become a full-time anti-trans propagandist, has had her ‘story’ in the anti-trans media widely reported. She was reported to the police last year for repeatedly deadnaming a trans woman. As a former officer

‪SEEN Police Official Open Public Network‬ ‪@seenpoliceuk.bsky.social‬
· 33m
she was fully aware of the harm intentional malicious use of a deadname causes trans people. South Wales Police (SWP) were clearly a bit miffed at the prospect of having to investigate their former big-boss officer and used every trick in the book to try to close the investigation down without

‪SEEN Police Official Open Public Network‬ ‪@seenpoliceuk.bsky.social‬
· 33m
even approaching Mrs Larkman for her version of events. They claimed they couldn’t find her! A bit rich as they know full well her address as she draws a colossal index-linked pension supported by the taxes of the public (including trans people’s taxes but we don’t count) So they spent many months..

‪SEEN Police Official Open Public Network‬ ‪@seenpoliceuk.bsky.social‬
· 33m
waiting on X supplying the owner data of the account Mrs Larkman runs on X (@JackMerched) - MONTHS, when other forces can turn around this task in under a week, but there we go. So now having ‘proof’ Mrs Larkman owned the X account, ignoring the fact Mrs Larkman HERSELF openly admits she runs the

‪SEEN Police Official Open Public Network‬ ‪@seenpoliceuk.bsky.social‬
· 33m
account, it seems from Mrs Larkman’s version of events in the right-wing tabloids, that some officers from her old employer finally approached her to speak about the matter. Apparently this was a right lark, a congenial old visit with the cops very impressed with their former super’. In

‪SEEN Police Official Open Public Network‬ ‪@seenpoliceuk.bsky.social‬
· 33m
fact it seems Mrs Larkman had them eating out of her hand and the officers departed laughing and joking about the matter. We then see that SWP gave a press statement to the tabloids that the matter would not be dealt with. A few problems with this. 1. WTF are SWP giving substantive updates in an

‪SEEN Police Official Open Public Network‬ ‪@seenpoliceuk.bsky.social‬
· 33m
investigation to the tabloids, when the person who reported the crime has heard nothing whatsoever? 2. The VCOP - the Victim Code of Practise - appears to have been put in the shredder by SWP. Not one single update was provided. We have long suspected that the U.K

‪SEEN Police Official Open Public Network‬ ‪@seenpoliceuk.bsky.social‬
· 33m
police service has been operating a secret policy to refuse to deal with any reports of online crimes motivated by hatred of LGBTQ people. There is a judicial review in progress on this very issue after, quite by chance, we obtained an internal document from Greater Manchester Police

‪SEEN Police Official Open Public Network‬ ‪@seenpoliceuk.bsky.social‬
· 33m
stating clearly they would not investigate any (yes, any) reports of online crimes motivated by hatred of transgender people. This document has now been sent to the Court of Appeal as new, relevant and admissible evidence as the judicial review itself is now at the Court of Appeal. We can also

‪SEEN Police Official Open Public Network‬ ‪@seenpoliceuk.bsky.social‬
· 33m
confirm that a certain judge from the Manchester circuit has taken a grudge towards the cases we have brought before the courts and is doing all the judge can to scupper these cases from being heard. We will report back when SWP finally get around to informing the person who reported Mrs Larkman

‪SEEN Police Official Open Public Network‬ ‪@seenpoliceuk.bsky.social‬
· 33m
For now, it does look like yet another police force, terrified of the reaction from the right-wing tabloids if they investigate any crime that involves harassment of trans people, has elected to throw us under a bus and to hell with the oaths they took about ‘fear of favour’. The LGBTQ

‪SEEN Police Official Open Public Network‬ ‪@seenpoliceuk.bsky.social‬
· 34m
community no longer enjoy equal access to a police service that the rest of the public enjoy by common law right. The ‘public’ is now defined by the police, as ‘the British population but not those who are LGBTQ’ A sad day for policing. Mrs Larkman should hang her head in shame, but like all

‪SEEN Police Official Open Public Network‬ ‪@seenpoliceuk.bsky.social‬
· 34m
radicalised extremists, will be completely oblivious to any harm she is doing. She’s an ideologue. To her, dehumanising trans people drives her, it’s her life, her hobby, her social life. She is utterly obsessed. She has become a female version of Graham Linehan. As for SWP…

‪SEEN Police Official Open Public Network‬ ‪@seenpoliceuk.bsky.social‬
· 28m
We will bring ANY police force to court if they try to claim that malicious deadnaming or persistent intentional misgendering is ‘free speech’ To their chiefs, if you want to follow GMP throwing tens of thousands away in legal costs, that’s up to you, but we never give up and never walk away.

‪SEEN Police Official Open Public Network‬ ‪@seenpoliceuk.bsky.social‬
· 28m
You will damned well follow the settled law of this land, not cower before the tabloid press, and you will obey your obligations under the EQA, the PSED and GDPR. FA with us you will FO.

All that really says is just how litigious and vexatious he is.

There’s some cops on fb arresting someone for calling someone a muppet! But whole football stadiums calling KS a wanker is OK! The law is an ass but maybe Glinner has managed to nip it in the bud!

Aha!

The police are likely managing the case on the basis of it will end up in court.
So my vote move to more likely tactial timing.💅

Now if I were Manchester Police I would be bringing the statement below and the named account holder to the attention of the Judges involved in any case management.

We can also confirm that a certain judge from the Manchester circuit has taken a grudge towards the cases we have brought before the courts and is doing all the judge can to scupper these cases from being heard.

To say a " judge " is to make a claim of judical misconduct

The fragrant bunch involved in these vexatious claims don’t pay enough taxes to by a penny carmel

has taken a grudge towards the cases we have brought before the courts

Can you imagine that poor judge's face when yet another splurge from "Lynsay" ends up on their desk...

Why has a Robert Burns quote sprung into my mind in relation to those words?
O wad some Power the giftie gie us / To see oursels as ithers see us!

This all reminds me of ratfucking a term came to consciousness during the revelations about Watergate and All the President's Men

politicaldictionary.com/words/ratfucking/

Thing is, since the Linehan arrest, the telegraph and other media are on to this now and they’re not going to let it go. I reckon an foi to all forces asking how many complaints this small and sorry band of time-wasters is responsible for will be next on their list. It’s all sunlight… and I can see it being their undoing. The public have reached their limit with the police’s failure to investigate actual crimes… and, as others have said, it stands in stark contrast to the violent threats against women from tras that are being glossed over and dismissed.

Indeed I am sure it is amazing.
A light change from the " Freeman-of-the-land " / " Sovereign Citizen " stuff which may pop up from time to time.

It would be a judge who would make the case of a person being a vexatious litigant, I assume?

It is common practice for people to call FW ‘Fred’ on X. Similarly, SH is often referred to as Fat Tone/Tony. My take on this is that posters are communicating that they do not view them as female and as being no different to who they were with their original names. I can see why they find this offensive. I can also see why people find being called cis offensive and find the statement TWAW offensive.

We really need to get past this phase in society where the idea of ‘being safe’ extends to people disagreeing with your views, beliefs and self perceptions.

Looks like his ranty thread hasn't garnered much reaction so far. Poor "Linsay"...

I don't think that a lot of these people actually find it offensive.I genuinely think it is about compelling others to obey/submit and/or conceal something more than your sex and/or being in control.

The common theme Ive noticed with a lot of the most batshit stuff, is that being right or reasoned doesn't matter. The method doesn't matter. Ethics? The only thing that matters is winning and dominating others at all costs.

Its not normal to get that upset when someone gets your name wrong. I don't think its an 'alarm and distress thing'. Not wishing to use pronouns or new names is about this 'winning'.

We are told they haven't changed, its just their body that was wrong. One of the things that constantly got said to me was "but he's still the same person", but thats just it, you are supposed to treat them as if they are completely new people and in a different way. You are supposed to treat in line with gender stereotypes in many cases. Its trying to control other peoples behaviour, in multiple ways. In practical terms they are not the same person and thats the point and problem.

I've always been struck by how I felt in my early twenties about wanting to 'escape' my past. This was after having a lot of resentment at being female. It took me to the other side of the world. I wanted to reinvent myself. I saw so many elements of the same in my brother. Its in line with a history of trauma - it could very much be a trauma response. Its part of identify formation, coming of age and becoming independant of parents; its a natural process that can be bumpier for some than others.

But we shouldn't see this as one dimensional. It can be multi faceted and thats where it can get sticky. Its more understandable if that reasoning is trauma or related to neurodiversity, but its not the only reason.

It is very curious to see who seems to currently engaging most in SLAPPing techniques in transgender circles presently. What unites them other than that?

The room keeps getting filled with large grey mammals.

I agree. I would add that plenty of people are deliberately getting the name ‘wrong’, and are not concerned if this causes offence. I would go as far as suggesting that offence is intended in some instances.

I think key players (those who were in and around Glinner’s case this week) are currently in permanent ‘conniptions mode’ as a result of losing capacity to use fear to silence women (and men like Glinner).

This weekend, Lyndsey Watson (via his SEEN in Police) account has been insisting in one post that no-one should follow the new EHRC guidance (once released), nor the SC ruling, but in another insisting that everyone must be forced to follow the EA2010 and GDPR.

Sad times

It is quite the mantrum.

I'd like to know which criminal offences "deadnaming" and "misgendering" (correctly sexing) come under.

Maybe one of our resident scolders can come along and enlighten us.

Vulnerable narcissism.

Narc supply. Even negative attention is attention.

Some of this is just sad losers using any means available to upset, control, affect others.

On the technical end I dont think anyone can claim that a judge makes the case of a person being a vexatious litigant.

The vexatious litigant makes the case by action and filing eg filing multiple cases one after the other with poor evidence etc after been told by the Courts that there is no substantive case with a vague hope that the underlying law will change.

But one thing the court cases will do is force the various police bodies to have a serious look at what they want to be policing. Or more importantly what they want to be seen to be policing.

The senoir officers need to bring the public with them when it comes to dealing with public order on the streets. The balance of scale in not using someones name correctly as a insult to that person against someone using SM to organise a riot or murder people is why they are making moves to have the laws changed.

Where has Felix got to?

Used to be very keen on copsplaining "malicious communications".

Maybe he was found out to be spending too much working time lecturing women online?

Policing in the UK is not derived from top down authoritative power. It comes from consensus from the public.

It should be about what the public want and consent to NOT what the police want to police.

They've forgotten who they serve.

What is mean is - who makes the charge?

'A party'. But unclear tbh.

https://harperjames.co.uk/article/vexatious-litigants/#:~:text=will%20discuss%20below.-,Civil%20Restraint%20Orders,campaign%20of%20harassment%20against%20you.

Only 13 people are listed as vexatious litigants in Scotland. All male.