Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

JKR Didn’t Have an Opinion. She Poisoned the Well

1000 replies

CSIRCP · 28/08/2025 14:32

This post will likely be a little too long for most, but if you can spare the time and have a cuppa handy let's sit down and have a chat, shall we?

Firstly, let’s stop calling this a debate. It’s not. This isn’t two sets of ideas clashing. This is one woman’s fear and confusion being weaponized against an entire community.

What J.K. Rowling has done is not just share an opinion. She’s poisoned the well. And that poison is spreading through politics, education, the media, and even the courts.

At the beginning, it might have looked like a tweet. Then a blog. But what she wrote in that essay was revealing: “If I’d been born thirty years later, I too might have tried to transition. The allure of escaping womanhood would have been huge.”
That’s not neutral. That’s projection. It was a confession, repackaged as concern. She projected her own dysphoria and personal battles onto the entire trans community and used it as the foundation for a movement built on suspicion and fear.

She said she cared about women’s rights. Then aligned herself with those who believe all trans women are predators.
She liked racist and Islamophobic tweets. She repeated antisemitic tropes. She cast activists as violent men in dresses. She accused anyone who challenged her of misogyny while branding herself the face of feminism.
All the while she built up a devoted audience that now includes some of the most extreme anti-trans voices in Britain and beyond.

This “gender critical” movement is not about safety, and it’s certainly not about truth. It’s about control.
Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull (Posie Parker), one of Rowling’s ideological allies, has welcomed neo-Nazis to her rallies. Actual Nazis. The kind of people Rowling once wrote villains about.
In one case, people connected to this movement were linked to the satanic terror group 764 — a group that has influenced teen suicides and violent attacks in UK schools. Let that sink in. This is who she’s empowering.

She didn’t just turn away when that started. She doubled down. She gave this movement a gloss of legitimacy. She used her fame to funnel people toward disinformation, fear, and cruelty—and dressed it all up as feminism. But it isn’t feminism when it excludes, vilifies, and harms other women. Especially trans women. Especially intersex people. Especially anyone who doesn’t fit into the narrow fantasy of who is acceptable.

Rowling’s language now echoes in government documents. Her phrases like “gender ideology” have been lifted from far right sources, including the Vatican and authoritarian regimes, and mainstreamed into British law. Her influence helped set the stage for the UK Supreme Court to redefine the word “woman” based on sex assigned at birth, stripping rights from trans and intersex people under the Equality Act. That’s what happens when the well is poisoned. People stop thinking. They start reacting.

Meanwhile, her cult chant her slogans as though they are scientific fact. But science says otherwise. Peer-reviewed studies show that trans people’s brain structures do not align with their sex assigned at birth. They show that gender identity forms in the womb, shaped by hormones and biology not ideology. Large-scale DNA studies have found gene variants linked to gender incongruence. And intersex people exist. That is biological fact. Not one of these truths can be erased by Rowling’s fiction.

What makes this so dangerous is how calm it all sounds. Rowling doesn’t scream. She whispers. She calls it “concern.” She says she’s “just asking questions.”
But it’s never neutral to question someone’s right to exist. It’s not a debate when one side is simply trying to live and the other is trying to strip away their legal recognition and healthcare.

This isn’t just a disagreement. This is a slow campaign of erasure, led by someone with a global platform and millions in the bank.

She’s not some deluded soul from MN; she’s a multi-millionaire author whose words shape global policy. She’s not being silenced. She’s being echoed by judges, by pundits, by politicians trying to climb the ladder by stepping on the backs of trans, non-binary, and intersex people.

And let’s not pretend it stops there. Her influence has allowed people to feel safe expressing open homophobia, biphobia, and hatred toward anyone who challenges gender norms. Some of the same people aligned with her have mocked survivors, denied racism, and claimed slavery was “fine” if it was “kind.”
This is not a group grounded in empathy. It’s a movement that thrives on exclusion and resentment. Some of them now openly identify as neo Nazis. That’s where we are.

So next time someone says “she’s just worried” or “she’s not anti-trans” or “can’t we just disagree,” consider these words. Show them what poison looks like. Not just hateful speech but the deliberate seeding of doubt, division, and cruelty, all wrapped in a soft voice and a smug smile. J.K. Rowling didn’t protect anyone. She infected people. And when she’s gone, her legacy won’t be literature it will be the damage she left behind.

You don’t need to cancel her. You just need to see her clearly.
And if you blindly follow Rowling and her ideas then you need to reflect on what you’re really endorsing.

Because ignorance is not an excuse. Not anymore.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
34
ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 29/08/2025 00:12

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:05

I’m going to say this.

I’d still rather be a heavily modified man who looks nothing like a man or less of a man. Than be a man. It’s so much of a relief to look in the mirror and see myself looking less like a man.m with time.

You will always be a man. No matter how much you alter yourself.

But if you want to look less like a “typical” man and more like a “typical” woman - go for it! We really do support you in that. I’m pleased you’re happy with your look. But it doesn’t make you a woman. Women are more than how feminine they look.

FrippEnos · 29/08/2025 00:12

Two posts instead of the normal dump and run.

I hope that the post is AI generated, because I would hope that no one would put any time in to writing that delusional drivel that is the first post.

murasaki · 29/08/2025 00:13

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:11

I’ll put it simply as I’ve stated before. I don’t want to be a male. I don’t want to be seen as one and I don’t want to be one. I already spent years on this myself fighting with myself. I held of transitioning for years, telling myself the same things your saying. You don’t have to be a women you can be and die shiver you like and still be a man. Problem is a fundamentally hated being a man to the core of my being. Nothing can change that for me, I tried.

In my case surgery is my own decision and it’s what I desire. The surgery scares me, not because of what I’ll lose. I won’t loose anything, But only because it’s a major surgery and that’s scary regardless of what is being performed.

You will still be male though. Whatever you do. And probably one in pain for a long time, prone to infection, with complete loss of sexual function, it really isn't a good idea.

Nothing, absolutely nothing, can make you into a woman, don't damage yourself physically more than you already have.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 29/08/2025 00:15

murasaki · 29/08/2025 00:08

OK, that sounds like you might work towards modified man in time with the right therapist. As the maleness is never going to go away. If the modified man makes you happier, great, but still stay out of women's spaces and stop saying you are one. A modified man who accepts that is fine.

I actually find it really sad that all this gender bollocks is penning men in.

I look at pictures of my dad in the 70’s and 80’s on his New Romantics phase with make up and long hair and painted nails. He looked awesome - and no one ever thought “oh it must mean I’m a woman”. Apparently he was super confident and a bit of a shagger

Now men can’t do any of that gender rejection without being told they’re women. We have gone backwards.

murasaki · 29/08/2025 00:18

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 29/08/2025 00:15

I actually find it really sad that all this gender bollocks is penning men in.

I look at pictures of my dad in the 70’s and 80’s on his New Romantics phase with make up and long hair and painted nails. He looked awesome - and no one ever thought “oh it must mean I’m a woman”. Apparently he was super confident and a bit of a shagger

Now men can’t do any of that gender rejection without being told they’re women. We have gone backwards.

Fully agree with that. Even in the 90s we had a couple of boys in my friendship group who loved eyeliner and longer hair. They pulled a lot....totally straight, never wanted to be women, just thought they looked good in it, and they did.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 29/08/2025 00:18

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:11

I’ll put it simply as I’ve stated before. I don’t want to be a male. I don’t want to be seen as one and I don’t want to be one. I already spent years on this myself fighting with myself. I held of transitioning for years, telling myself the same things your saying. You don’t have to be a women you can be and die shiver you like and still be a man. Problem is a fundamentally hated being a man to the core of my being. Nothing can change that for me, I tried.

In my case surgery is my own decision and it’s what I desire. The surgery scares me, not because of what I’ll lose. I won’t loose anything, But only because it’s a major surgery and that’s scary regardless of what is being performed.

But what’s the crux of why you don’t want to be male?

And to be blunt - you are male and always will be. No amount of modifications will change that. Isn’t it better you find a way to live with that truth whilst also embracing your feminine side? We need more men breaking gender boundaries!

You will lose a lot with surgery actually. And it won’t make you a woman. And no matter how much you want it, you can’t make other people see you as a woman.

Do you not think about the women whose spaces you’re entering, and how they feel about having a man in their space? If YOU hate being a man, you can perhaps relate to how women feel about men

murasaki · 29/08/2025 00:20

It's incredibly demeaning to women that he reduces us to tits, long hair and leggings.

My mum had a mink coat inherited from her granny. I used to wear it for dressing up, didn't make me a mink.

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:22

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 29/08/2025 00:18

But what’s the crux of why you don’t want to be male?

And to be blunt - you are male and always will be. No amount of modifications will change that. Isn’t it better you find a way to live with that truth whilst also embracing your feminine side? We need more men breaking gender boundaries!

You will lose a lot with surgery actually. And it won’t make you a woman. And no matter how much you want it, you can’t make other people see you as a woman.

Do you not think about the women whose spaces you’re entering, and how they feel about having a man in their space? If YOU hate being a man, you can perhaps relate to how women feel about men

I literally already stated I tried to be one of those men. I genuinely did, but that’s the point I’m not one of those men, I’m not a man.

Also I do relate. But what am I supposed to do just infinitely hate my existence.

FrippEnos · 29/08/2025 00:22

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:11

I’ll put it simply as I’ve stated before. I don’t want to be a male. I don’t want to be seen as one and I don’t want to be one. I already spent years on this myself fighting with myself. I held of transitioning for years, telling myself the same things your saying. You don’t have to be a women you can be and die shiver you like and still be a man. Problem is a fundamentally hated being a man to the core of my being. Nothing can change that for me, I tried.

In my case surgery is my own decision and it’s what I desire. The surgery scares me, not because of what I’ll lose. I won’t loose anything, But only because it’s a major surgery and that’s scary regardless of what is being performed.

@SnugPeach

The thing is that whatever people's beliefs on here, you will generally get a response of
"you do you" and "best of luck"

If you want to do the hormones, and the surgery, as long as you have had all of the good and bad explained to you and you fully understand it go for it.
"you do you", "best of luck"

But this doesn't mean that I (or others) have to stand by and let you take others hard earned rights off them, or let you give children and teenagers bad information that will affect their health and wellbeing for years to come.

You have the same rights as everyone else.
You can play sports.
You can go to the toilet.
You can get jobs
You can get medication
You can get surgery etc. etc.

It is not JKR's fault or anyone else's fault that stonewall, mermaids and any other Pro trans organisation has lied to you about the legal rights that you have and subsequently have not lost.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 29/08/2025 00:22

murasaki · 29/08/2025 00:18

Fully agree with that. Even in the 90s we had a couple of boys in my friendship group who loved eyeliner and longer hair. They pulled a lot....totally straight, never wanted to be women, just thought they looked good in it, and they did.

Ooh I do like a bit of “guyliner”! The feminine look in men is very attractive.

It’s sad that now someone twat would pop up and tell those boys “are you sure you’re a boy?” I think Snug is a good example of how gender stereotypes make men and boys (and of course WAG) hate themselves. If you’ve spent your whole life being told to conform to the concept of masculinity/femininity of course you think something wrong with you if you’re not masculine/feminine!

murasaki · 29/08/2025 00:23

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:22

I literally already stated I tried to be one of those men. I genuinely did, but that’s the point I’m not one of those men, I’m not a man.

Also I do relate. But what am I supposed to do just infinitely hate my existence.

Edited

But you are, and you are not welcome in female single sex spaces.

Boiledbeetle · 29/08/2025 00:23

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:11

I’ll put it simply as I’ve stated before. I don’t want to be a male. I don’t want to be seen as one and I don’t want to be one. I already spent years on this myself fighting with myself. I held of transitioning for years, telling myself the same things your saying. You don’t have to be a women you can be and die shiver you like and still be a man. Problem is a fundamentally hated being a man to the core of my being. Nothing can change that for me, I tried.

In my case surgery is my own decision and it’s what I desire. The surgery scares me, not because of what I’ll lose. I won’t loose anything, But only because it’s a major surgery and that’s scary regardless of what is being performed.

Have you properly looked into all the things that can go wrong? It's brutal surgery and could leave you with life long health problems. It's not as successful as some would have you believe, the results are not as amazing as social media posts make out.

It's major surgery that could kill you or seriously limit your life. And as much as you probably think I'm a heartless bitch I wouldn't wish surgery complications on anyone.

I'm living with the life long problems caused by surgery that went wrong. In hindsight I wish I hadn't had the operation that went wrong, it changed my life, and not in a good way. I have life long pain and further complications requiring further surgeries over the years. I'd have been better off living with the problems the original surgery was supposed to solve.

eatfigs · 29/08/2025 00:23

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:22

I literally already stated I tried to be one of those men. I genuinely did, but that’s the point I’m not one of those men, I’m not a man.

Also I do relate. But what am I supposed to do just infinitely hate my existence.

Edited

You are though. You're male, and an adult. This means you are a man.

I understand that you don't want to be, but beliefs and desires don't change material reality. Sorry but that's just how it is.

RogueFemale · 29/08/2025 00:24

DialSquare · 28/08/2025 14:39

Parklife

LOL

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 29/08/2025 00:24

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:22

I literally already stated I tried to be one of those men. I genuinely did, but that’s the point I’m not one of those men, I’m not a man.

Also I do relate. But what am I supposed to do just infinitely hate my existence.

Edited

But you are a man.

What about you makes you think you’re a woman?

You’re not supposed to just ride roughshod over the rights and feelings of women because you don’t want to accept you’re a man.

Find a way to not hate it. Find a new therapist for a start.

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:25

FrippEnos · 29/08/2025 00:22

@SnugPeach

The thing is that whatever people's beliefs on here, you will generally get a response of
"you do you" and "best of luck"

If you want to do the hormones, and the surgery, as long as you have had all of the good and bad explained to you and you fully understand it go for it.
"you do you", "best of luck"

But this doesn't mean that I (or others) have to stand by and let you take others hard earned rights off them, or let you give children and teenagers bad information that will affect their health and wellbeing for years to come.

You have the same rights as everyone else.
You can play sports.
You can go to the toilet.
You can get jobs
You can get medication
You can get surgery etc. etc.

It is not JKR's fault or anyone else's fault that stonewall, mermaids and any other Pro trans organisation has lied to you about the legal rights that you have and subsequently have not lost.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/apr/18/ruling-on-woman-definition-at-odds-with-uk-equality-acts-aim-says-ex-civil-servant#:~:text=The%20supreme%20court's%20decision%20to,come%20to%2C%E2%80%9D%20she%20said.

Court ruling on ‘woman’ at odds with UK Equality Act aim, says ex-civil servant

‘Clear premise’ was to give trans and biological women same sex discrimination rights, says official who helped draft act

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/apr/18/ruling-on-woman-definition-at-odds-with-uk-equality-acts-aim-says-ex-civil-servant#:~:text=The%20supreme%20court's%20decision%20to,come%20to%2C%E2%80%9D%20she%20said.

MyAmpleSheep · 29/08/2025 00:27

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:22

I literally already stated I tried to be one of those men. I genuinely did, but that’s the point I’m not one of those men, I’m not a man.

Also I do relate. But what am I supposed to do just infinitely hate my existence.

Edited

What you are suppposed to do is deal with your own problems without using women as support animals to make yourself feel better.

It cannot be put any more clearly: your self-loathing is your own problem, not women’s problem. It’s selfish and inappropriate to make it so.

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:27

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 29/08/2025 00:24

But you are a man.

What about you makes you think you’re a woman?

You’re not supposed to just ride roughshod over the rights and feelings of women because you don’t want to accept you’re a man.

Find a way to not hate it. Find a new therapist for a start.

Don’t you think I spent years already trying that. Why won’t any of you accept that’s not a reality that exists for me.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 29/08/2025 00:28

So what. This person’s opinion is just an opinion. There’s plenty of more relevant ones.

The Supreme Court ruling was the right and logical conclusion. Trans people have lost no rights. Wording has just been clarified. That’s all.

And in fact, because the wording is not new, it’s all “old” wording, so it’s been clarified that men/transwomen NEVER had the right to access women’s spaces like they thought. The community owes women a grovelling apology for thinking they did for all these years.

murasaki · 29/08/2025 00:29

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:27

Don’t you think I spent years already trying that. Why won’t any of you accept that’s not a reality that exists for me.

And why won't you accept that every cell in your body makes you a man. One one who doesn't fancy toxic masculinity or male clothes but a man. You need a better therapist pronto.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 29/08/2025 00:30

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:27

Don’t you think I spent years already trying that. Why won’t any of you accept that’s not a reality that exists for me.

Because the reality is that you are a man. Why do we have to accept an alternative reality?

Why wot YOU accept that?

And I’ll be honest a being stroppy because women won’t just roll over and pander to your delusions SMACKS of male entitlement and shows that no amount of “transitioning” can un-men males.

MarieDeGournay · 29/08/2025 00:31

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:22

I literally already stated I tried to be one of those men. I genuinely did, but that’s the point I’m not one of those men, I’m not a man.

Also I do relate. But what am I supposed to do just infinitely hate my existence.

Edited

You don't have to 'try' to be a man, you are one. You achieved it from day one of your existence. It's encoded throughout your physical reality.

I'm very sorry that you hate your existence as a man. I remember what it was like hating my existence as a young woman.

But if the choice is :

  1. appropriate an identity which is not yours and place yourself in social spaces where you do not belong, and indeed where you are legally not supposed to be, to the detriment of all the hundreds/thousands of women you will encounter in your life OR

2 infinitely hate your existence

I think the ethical and pro-social answer is 2 - but preferably finding a way

  1. tone down the infinite hatred part.
edited to add in reply to Why won’t any of you accept that’s not a reality that exists for me.

OK, it's not a reality that exists for you. But reality doesn't actually care whether or not it 'exists for you', reality doesn't depend on individuals believing in it to exist.
So yes, OK, fine, it's not a reality that exists for you, but that changes nothing.

murasaki · 29/08/2025 00:31

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:27

Don’t you think I spent years already trying that. Why won’t any of you accept that’s not a reality that exists for me.

Also, other people's reality exists, and we see you. As ours is actually reality, not an attempted escape from what is, granted, a traumatic life.

TrainedByCats · 29/08/2025 00:32

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:22

I literally already stated I tried to be one of those men. I genuinely did, but that’s the point I’m not one of those men, I’m not a man.

Also I do relate. But what am I supposed to do just infinitely hate my existence.

Edited

And what are we supposed to do? Budge up and accept men who don’t like being men? Despite the our very legitimate fear? Our wish for dignity? That the introduction of just one man changes female only spaces?

Why do you expect untold numbers of women who hate having males in what were formerly single sex places to accommodate you?

Why do you think your wishes should overrule so many of us? Other than Patriarchy in action of course 🙄 it’s your very maleness that is leading you to think your wishes are more important.

You have no experience of being in female spaces because your very presence has changed them into mixed sex every single time.

SnugPeach · 29/08/2025 00:32

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 29/08/2025 00:28

So what. This person’s opinion is just an opinion. There’s plenty of more relevant ones.

The Supreme Court ruling was the right and logical conclusion. Trans people have lost no rights. Wording has just been clarified. That’s all.

And in fact, because the wording is not new, it’s all “old” wording, so it’s been clarified that men/transwomen NEVER had the right to access women’s spaces like they thought. The community owes women a grovelling apology for thinking they did for all these years.

I give you an article from a person who literally worked on the Equality Act saying it was supposed to trans inclusive and your response is simply ‘so what’.

So the point is we did have those rights till the ruling and that is how the act was intended to be. As literally stated by somebody who worked on the Equality Act.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.