Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Anne health Susie Greens new clinic

259 replies

Hoardasurass · 24/08/2025 07:43

So not happy with the puberty blockers ban in the UK and frustrated by Wes Streeting closing her planned loophole she found a new one and has been arranging for parents to take their kids abroad to get prescriptions of puberty blockers injections and testosterone for under 16s. The government has said its going to stop the practice but hasn't said how.

Gift token for the telegraph article

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/d5a10834b446c428

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
ThatBlackCat · 28/08/2025 05:50

PlanetJanette · 27/08/2025 16:53

That's like saying condoms sterilise men because they stop semen reaching an egg. While the second clause is true, the sterilisation clause is not - because as soon as the condom is removed the impact on fertility ends.

Blocking puberty blocks the development of fertility. It does not destroy it, and that development of fertility resumes when puberty resumes. Unless as an adult, the (former) child decides that they want to continue on to cross sex hormones.

Oh for goodness sake, you are embarrassing yourself with this nonsense. A condom does not ALTER YOUR SEX ORGANS.

Puberty blockers do. You don't seem to understand that if a child stays on PBs for years, they NEVER go through puberty. They don't suddenly go through puberty at 18 if they stop PBs at 18. The body does NOT go through puberty then or at all. So the sex organs never develop.

ThatBlackCat · 28/08/2025 05:59

PlanetJanette · 27/08/2025 20:02

Hang on you lot claim there are lots and lots of detransitioners out there. But also that puberty blockers ‘lock in’ a trans identity. Those two things are not compatible unless you think puberty blockers actively prevent regret/detransitioning which I don’t think you do.

Er, no. Puberty Blockers lock in sex damage. Nothing to do with 'identity'. That damage to the body remains even when someone detransitions. The examples of Ritchie etc show this.

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 28/08/2025 09:26

ThatBlackCat · 28/08/2025 04:23

Girls run away from being female because of our oppression. Where as males run to being a girl/woman due to sexual fetish.

These seem to be major factors in typical transgender identification. Anecdotally, it appears that way with the transman I know quite well. I think there may also be a minority motivation in some men of wanting to escape societal expectations of men.

Shortshriftandlethal · 28/08/2025 10:34

PlanetJanette · 27/08/2025 21:33

I have actually said plenty about gender affirming healthcare for children on this thread.

But yes, chin stroking or not, it is certainly very illustrative that the GC voices on here range from actively opposed to adult women having full control of their fertility to merely silence on that matter. Not a single so called feminist (myself excluded) prepared to say definitively that women are better placed than their doctors to decide if they are prepared to take a risk that they may one day regret not having children.

You've had it explained to you on numerous occasions that ethics takes into account factors other than 'individual autonomy'. Autonomy is of course an important factor, but the moderation of individual actions via a system of consensual moral guidelines, is another key principle.

Ethical principles go beyond the individual and their desires. You have twisted this to suggest that some women don't believe that a woman has a right to control her fertility or to choose to limit it. This is not the case, but there are limits and boundaries to everything, and ultimately none of us is totally autonomous.

snekkes · 28/08/2025 20:31

ThatBlackCat · 28/08/2025 05:59

Er, no. Puberty Blockers lock in sex damage. Nothing to do with 'identity'. That damage to the body remains even when someone detransitions. The examples of Ritchie etc show this.

Having begun transition in his mid to late 20s, it'd be pretty odd for Ritchie to be on puberty blockers.

OldCrone · 28/08/2025 20:44

snekkes · 28/08/2025 20:31

Having begun transition in his mid to late 20s, it'd be pretty odd for Ritchie to be on puberty blockers.

Men who want to pretend to be women take hormone blockers until they are castrated.

snekkes · 28/08/2025 20:54

OldCrone · 28/08/2025 20:44

Men who want to pretend to be women take hormone blockers until they are castrated.

OK, but they probably weren't doing much to his brain development at, IIRC, something like 26.

BundleBoogie · 29/08/2025 08:56

snekkes · 28/08/2025 20:54

OK, but they probably weren't doing much to his brain development at, IIRC, something like 26.

We don’t know exactly what it did to his brain function - they may have made him more vulnerable to grooming. We know hormone/puberty blockers have an impact on adults as they used to be given to chemically castrate rapists, and prior to that, gay men like Alan Turing.

Ironically they are no longer given to rapists on human rights grounds.

Ritchie had mental health issues and was vulnerable when he was groomed and pushed into surgery (by activists) which he regretted as soon as he woke up.

PrettyDamnCosmic · 30/08/2025 10:53

PlanetJanette · 27/08/2025 21:33

I have actually said plenty about gender affirming healthcare for children on this thread.

But yes, chin stroking or not, it is certainly very illustrative that the GC voices on here range from actively opposed to adult women having full control of their fertility to merely silence on that matter. Not a single so called feminist (myself excluded) prepared to say definitively that women are better placed than their doctors to decide if they are prepared to take a risk that they may one day regret not having children.

Doctors don't just do what their patients tell them (unless like in the US they do it for money). For example you have no right to insist that attempts are made to resuscitate you if your doctors think CPR would be futile. Doctors will as far as possible act in their patient's best interests.

You might think it paternalistic that doctors are reluctant to sterilise men or women under the age of thirty but if the general medical consensus is that it's better to leave the operation until the chance of regret is lower. You might find a doctor who doesn't agree with the consensus but you cannot make the rest of us who don't agree operate on you. Sterilisation is not a human right nor is receiving puberty blockers, cross sex hormones & mutilating surgery. Patients demanding these treatments cannot force doctors to do their bidding.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread