Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

European Convention on Human Rights

419 replies

JellySaurus · 06/08/2025 23:13

ARTICLE 8 the right to respect for private and family life, and Article 12 the right to marry, are used as to justify the requirement for the UK government to legally recognise people as the opposite sex. (Redundant, now that same-sex marriage is legal.)

8.1 Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

But why is 8.2, which is not mentioned in Article 12 but appears in similar form in many other Articles, not used as an argument for removing the GRA from our law?

8.2 There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

Enabling men to access female single-sex spaces has resulted in crimes: women and girls being assaulted and raped. Medical transition causes long-term ill-health. Telling children that they may not be the sex they are, or that they have to pretend that somebody is not the sex they are, is immoral as it subverts safeguarding. Multiple court cases have demonstrated that transgenderism illegally restricts the rights and freedoms of others.

Isn’t it time to recognise this?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Myalternate · 09/08/2025 10:51

RedToothBrush · 09/08/2025 10:46

And no it's nothing like being gay.

This is coercive force teaming and it's a myth.

It's also homophobic to suggest this.

Edited

The Trans and ‘NB’ community even separated themselves from the LGB groups at London Pride in order to hold their own celebrations in Soho Village.

They are indeed homophobic.

AYoungTransWoman · 09/08/2025 10:51

RedToothBrush · 09/08/2025 10:46

And no it's nothing like being gay.

This is coercive force teaming and it's a myth.

It's also homophobic to suggest this.

Edited

3% of the LGBTQ people think it should be LGB. Stop talking over the LGBTQ+ community and recognise that we are teamed because we've both faced the same bigotry that looks almost identical.

SerendipityJane · 09/08/2025 10:52

AYoungTransWoman · 09/08/2025 10:39

It wouldn't strike down the supreme court, it would state that the UK is incompatibile with human rights law. The currently government is bad, but not bad enough where they would refuse to follow the law

Once again: how many prisoners have the vote ?

AYoungTransWoman · 09/08/2025 10:55

EsmeWeatherwaxHatpin · 09/08/2025 10:47

These arguments were being made 5/6 years ago and have been proven incorrect time and time again in law and in practice.

The practical and kind thing to do now would be to accept reality and advocate for spaces for trans identifying men and women as needed but separate from single sex spaces if you don’t want to us the correct services.

No, we're not going to roll over and accept discrimination. The bathroom ban is unenforceable, all this means is more people are going stealth like me

Theswiveleyeballsinthesky · 09/08/2025 10:55

AYoungTransWoman · 09/08/2025 00:58

I mean it's not really a matter of if, but when, the ECHR strikes down the UKs bathroom ban. It's an unworkable policy that interferes with trans people's right to privacy.

lol the ECHR has no power over the laws of the UK. It can ask/suggest/demand but it actually can't enforce anything - it's not as if it can sack parliament or send in an army is i

plus of course in the UK they are toilets not bathrooms so off you pop

Theswiveleyeballsinthesky · 09/08/2025 10:57

AYoungTransWoman · 09/08/2025 10:55

No, we're not going to roll over and accept discrimination. The bathroom ban is unenforceable, all this means is more people are going stealth like me

You mean you as a man are invading women's spaces and relying on women's natural socialisation not to approach men and tell them "no" on the basis that men can get very angry very quickly

which you'd know if you were an actual woman

Chersfrozenface · 09/08/2025 10:58

AYoungTransWoman · 09/08/2025 10:55

No, we're not going to roll over and accept discrimination. The bathroom ban is unenforceable, all this means is more people are going stealth like me

Going stealth consists of what exactly?

AYoungTransWoman · 09/08/2025 11:00

Theswiveleyeballsinthesky · 09/08/2025 10:57

You mean you as a man are invading women's spaces and relying on women's natural socialisation not to approach men and tell them "no" on the basis that men can get very angry very quickly

which you'd know if you were an actual woman

I am a woman, I look like a woman so I use women's spaces. There my spaces too.

SerendipityJane · 09/08/2025 11:01

All human rights are enumerated within the framework of having to run a country. That's why they are qualified.

For example everyone has the right to liberty. Yet we can lock people up. Because it turns out that being naughty isn't a human right.

Even the right to life is qualified - after all France was happily decapitating wrong'uns into the 70s.

MarieDeGournay · 09/08/2025 11:01

I think they key point at the heart of the OP is not marriage, which Cannongoose's reply focuses on, but what happens in a democratic society when two groups make claims which are inimical to each other.

One of the glaring problems with transgenderism is that it erases the terms by which two important social groups, women and men, are defined.
You can have all the charters, declarations, Magna Cartas, proclamations, etc in the world declaring that women have certain rights specific to them, or people with disabilities, or other groups in society, have certain rights specific to them.
Definition of terms is essential in identifying these groups and guaranteeing them their rights.

A very very small, but very vocal group of men claim to be women, and claim they are therefore entitled to rights specific to women as a social group. This obliterates the established meaning of the term 'woman', and makes laws which are set up to confirms the rights of the group 'women' mean nothing, if the definition of 'women' includes 'men'.

It means that women as a social group lose the rights that they have been guaranteed in the past, such as the right to single-sex spaces in certain circumstances.
Women lose our sex-specific rights if anybody, regardless of biological sex, can legally identify as a woman, just as people with disabilities would lose rights to reasonable adjustments such as designated parking spaces if the entire population could legally identify as disabled.
Without clear definition of terms, specific rights and entitlements are paper tigers.

I believe that defining 'woman' as 'biological woman', excluding all biological men, regardless of how they identify, is covered by

8.2 There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society ...for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

because allowing anybody to identify into social groups they do not belong to is inimical to the rights and freedoms of those groups.

RedToothBrush · 09/08/2025 11:04

AYoungTransWoman · 09/08/2025 10:50

You mean the racist woman who wanted to put bacon through Muslims letterboxes?

We are experiencing a roll back very similar to what Thatcher did. We've experienced reactionary politics before and we got through it then. It turns out relentless biased hostile media does change people opinions.

The thing you forget is that young people are overwhelmingly more pro trans as young people have grown up with trans people and know that all the lies that anti-trans people believe aren't true. It's just a matter of time tbh

No it's not.

You are looking at the figures you like.

Younger teens don't share those views and as people get jobs and have kids it changes.

You are right about the matter of time, but not in the way you want. It's all about the insurance and the scandals.

As for the smear about bacon - you could have used an example that was unacceptable and she admitted to. But not, you choose the one smear that was a load of utter bollocks. Which shows a lot about where you get your info from.

RedToothBrush · 09/08/2025 11:05

AYoungTransWoman · 09/08/2025 10:55

No, we're not going to roll over and accept discrimination. The bathroom ban is unenforceable, all this means is more people are going stealth like me

So you admit to being a creep who deliberately wants to mislead women and go against their consent?

Good stuff. At least you admit it.

EsmeWeatherwaxHatpin · 09/08/2025 11:09

AYoungTransWoman · 09/08/2025 10:55

No, we're not going to roll over and accept discrimination. The bathroom ban is unenforceable, all this means is more people are going stealth like me

But you aren’t banned from using a loo. The expectation is just that you use the toilet of your sex.

Not your identity. Not your wish. Not your gender. Not your expression. Not your outfit. Not your makeup. Your sex.

Being “stealth” just means you’re abusive and demonstrating stereotypical patterns of male behaviour.

Brainworm · 09/08/2025 11:10

@AYoungTransWoman, when you refer to an increase in people with trans identities ‘going stealth’ what does this entail? What are they going or not doing now that will change when ‘going stealth’?

Chersfrozenface · 09/08/2025 11:10

AYoungTransWoman · 09/08/2025 11:00

I am a woman, I look like a woman so I use women's spaces. There my spaces too.

How exactly do you look like a woman?

Dress, hair length, make up, fake boobs? That is, externals.

Or skeletal structure, musculature, bodily proportions, gait? The things that mark a human being as male or female to any woman with eyes.

RedToothBrush · 09/08/2025 11:10

EsmeWeatherwaxHatpin · 09/08/2025 11:09

But you aren’t banned from using a loo. The expectation is just that you use the toilet of your sex.

Not your identity. Not your wish. Not your gender. Not your expression. Not your outfit. Not your makeup. Your sex.

Being “stealth” just means you’re abusive and demonstrating stereotypical patterns of male behaviour.

Exactly.

They don't want to use third spaces because the whole point is using the women in the spaces.

The more we see of this, the more the public will kick back.

IrnBruAndDietCoke · 09/08/2025 11:19

So as other groups have learned when they've tried to challenge it (e.g. prisoner votes) article 8 is basically not worth the paper it's written on due to 8.2 and the ECHR has no teeth to enforce anything. The government can just say they're doing it for the "protection of morals" or "prevention of harm to others" and that basically covers everything.

While I agree this will coincidentally work well for the situation of keeping trans people out of bathrooms, I do also think that the feeble way article 8 is written has set itself up to be misused by bad governments around the world who have no case to answer for horrific interferences with people's private lives and family lives (where they even half-heartedly subscribe to the UN declaration of human rights). Even in this country 8.2 is being misused.

But overall, no, TRAs can't frustrate the laws of a country with "article 8 wahhhhh" because otherwise people would be doing it to sort out some really horrible shit that's screwing people over for reasons not of their own making.

AYoungTransWoman · 09/08/2025 11:20

MarieDeGournay · 09/08/2025 11:01

I think they key point at the heart of the OP is not marriage, which Cannongoose's reply focuses on, but what happens in a democratic society when two groups make claims which are inimical to each other.

One of the glaring problems with transgenderism is that it erases the terms by which two important social groups, women and men, are defined.
You can have all the charters, declarations, Magna Cartas, proclamations, etc in the world declaring that women have certain rights specific to them, or people with disabilities, or other groups in society, have certain rights specific to them.
Definition of terms is essential in identifying these groups and guaranteeing them their rights.

A very very small, but very vocal group of men claim to be women, and claim they are therefore entitled to rights specific to women as a social group. This obliterates the established meaning of the term 'woman', and makes laws which are set up to confirms the rights of the group 'women' mean nothing, if the definition of 'women' includes 'men'.

It means that women as a social group lose the rights that they have been guaranteed in the past, such as the right to single-sex spaces in certain circumstances.
Women lose our sex-specific rights if anybody, regardless of biological sex, can legally identify as a woman, just as people with disabilities would lose rights to reasonable adjustments such as designated parking spaces if the entire population could legally identify as disabled.
Without clear definition of terms, specific rights and entitlements are paper tigers.

I believe that defining 'woman' as 'biological woman', excluding all biological men, regardless of how they identify, is covered by

8.2 There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society ...for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

because allowing anybody to identify into social groups they do not belong to is inimical to the rights and freedoms of those groups.

The ECHR has already told you that's wrong in Goodwin v UK

MarieDeGournay · 09/08/2025 11:20

AYoungTransWoman · 09/08/2025 10:55

No, we're not going to roll over and accept discrimination. The bathroom ban is unenforceable, all this means is more people are going stealth like me

Oh dear, AYoungTransWoman, you really need to read the room before making statements like that!

We all have to accept discrimination in life - like people without driving licences being discriminated against by not being allowed drive on public roads, or 35-year-olds being discriminated against by not receiving the old age pension..

Discrimination is not wrong; unfair discrimination is, but there's nothing unfair about stating that the terms 'women' and 'men', when used in legislation, follow the established, scientific, biological definitions, not what people feel they should mean.

And asserting as some kind of badge of honour that males like you are going to continue using facilities designated for women shows a disrespect for the law, and a disrespect for women's right to privacy, comfort and all the other things that transwomen seem to think they alone are entitled to. Bravo..

And the use of the word 'bathroom' instead of 'toilet' -
When visiting a private house I might well ask if I may 'use the bathroom', but if I was in a public space like a shopping centre or a museum or a sports stadium and I asked 'where is the women's bathroom?' I'd get very strange looks, and 'Yeh whaa? you mean the toilets?' because everybody knows that toilets in public venues do not have baths in them.

AYoungTransWoman · 09/08/2025 11:23

EsmeWeatherwaxHatpin · 09/08/2025 11:09

But you aren’t banned from using a loo. The expectation is just that you use the toilet of your sex.

Not your identity. Not your wish. Not your gender. Not your expression. Not your outfit. Not your makeup. Your sex.

Being “stealth” just means you’re abusive and demonstrating stereotypical patterns of male behaviour.

I'm banned from using the toilet. It's not safe for women to use the mens

Theswiveleyeballsinthesky · 09/08/2025 11:28

AYoungTransWoman · 09/08/2025 11:00

I am a woman, I look like a woman so I use women's spaces. There my spaces too.

You're not a woman

how does one look like a woman? Are women who wear trousers and have a buzz cut not women?

i mean do you ever stop to think how bloody insulting it is for a man to pop on a dress, grow his hair, put on done make up and e voila! Woman!

of course none of the biological
inconveniences of womanhood like periods or pregnancy or menopause. No lifetime of female socialisation to be nice, no being ignored - that's how we know TW are men because if they were actually women they'd be ignored

your level of contempt for women is breathtaking

EsmeWeatherwaxHatpin · 09/08/2025 11:35

AYoungTransWoman · 09/08/2025 11:23

I'm banned from using the toilet. It's not safe for women to use the mens

We know. That’s we don’t want men in ladies loos. Whatever you wear.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/08/2025 11:52

Myalternate · 09/08/2025 10:45

Transwomen are men.

Can’t be bothered to expand on this argument because Transwomen can’t be reasoned with.

Exactly. There’s literally no point trying to argue with that level of ideological blinkeredness.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 09/08/2025 11:54

AYoungTransWoman · 09/08/2025 10:39

It wouldn't strike down the supreme court, it would state that the UK is incompatibile with human rights law. The currently government is bad, but not bad enough where they would refuse to follow the law

Whether it violates women’s human rights (it does) for men to be allowed to oppress women in this way has never been tested by the ECHR, has it? Bring it on, I say.

AYoungTransWoman · 09/08/2025 12:07

Theswiveleyeballsinthesky · 09/08/2025 11:28

You're not a woman

how does one look like a woman? Are women who wear trousers and have a buzz cut not women?

i mean do you ever stop to think how bloody insulting it is for a man to pop on a dress, grow his hair, put on done make up and e voila! Woman!

of course none of the biological
inconveniences of womanhood like periods or pregnancy or menopause. No lifetime of female socialisation to be nice, no being ignored - that's how we know TW are men because if they were actually women they'd be ignored

your level of contempt for women is breathtaking

Edited

I'm a woman because I am transsexual with gender dysphoria and have taken steps to alter my biology. I have taken hormones, and I am getting surgery.

I haven't just put a dress on and voila, that's not what a trans person is.

Swipe left for the next trending thread