Organisations that put the onus on the people that they are providing a service for to reject someone is a major part of the issue.
That is something that is missing now. And I think it is missing because to provide an ‘inclusive’ environment with today’s lens means not acknowledging that people’s transgender identities don’t reflect material reality. Yet society is expected to act as if those identities are material real.
People who have been shamed or taught to have low boundaries are not likely to reject the people who cause them distress. It is actually cruel to put people in that position.
It is like Dr Upton declaring that it is up to any female patient to reject him once he presents himself as their doctor after they have specified that they need a female doctor. With that female patient understanding that if they reject him there may be significant negative ramifications.
The only way around this is for organisations to stop acting as if a person’s philosophical belief about themselves reflects their body’s reality and allow sex to once again be prioritised.