so if we can bring the debate back into being one based on rationalism and compassion – and actually as we know, the facts – I think that’s a much better place for all of us to be.
Yup, the GC view, informed by science, safeguarding and equity.
they look swivel eyed and honestly, they’re not very well people, I don’t think
Sounds like he's describing the transgenderists, who demand that women provide validation to strange men by stripping naked in front of them, allowing strange men to listen to women urinating and rummage in bins for used tampons, and insist that there's no difference between a middle-aged, 6'+ man and the female athletes he's thrashing.
So we have to make sure, as passionate we are, that we’re talking passionately but sensibly and bringing people around.
Which we are doing, assisted by the science and by common sense decisions by our courts.
Mr Roca has described himself as “Macclesfield’s first openly gay” MP
So why did he want his gay constituents deprived of their rights to express their sexuality in the privacy of their associations and their homes? (Oh, sorry, the answer's obvious, of course: because he's not bothered about gay women, only gay men. And some heterosexual men.)
You’ve got the full gamut of human qualities there – the most amazing people really fighting for incredible principles and values,” he said.
Yup, GC people.
“You’ve also got people who are motivated by fear, envy, greed, all sorts.
Yup, the people who took from others, who got used to being a sacred caste that managed to persuade others that women should have nothing for themselves, not even their name, are now having to get used to the fact that they are no more special than anybody else, and that the law applies equally to them.