And finally, because I have a few minutes. If there is even a small advantage, this means that logically and realistically girls generally will be working harder than the boys.
What is this messaging to the girls? And do people think that children don’t understand this?
The outcome is that girls feel that they have to put in more work just to be recognised for their exceptional performance. Whereas the boys only have to perform enough to beat the person behind them.
This is the dynamic that is supported with these mixed sex races. Whether it is intended or not.
Why do we teach children that we undervalue their efforts?
If we, as parents, can’t be bothered ‘whining and bitching’, or just politely raising the point officially, why should we expect girls to be bothered putting in the effort.
And if in a few years parents turn around and say, why don’t you enjoy sport? What the fuck do those who dismissed their needs for single sex sports expect girls to say?
On one hand we are saying ‘girls need to do more sport’ and on the other we are saying ‘don’t worry girls if boys beat you, some other girls beat boys, you are obviously not good enough’..
And do some people think the only time to address this situation, even with the evidence being conclusive, is if there comes a time at that particular school when no girls are winning? Because until then some people will dismiss the evidence and rely on unscientific and fallacious arguments to justify inaction, and the old ‘my child’s alright’ argument.
Also if the desired outcome is ‘fun’ then don’t do races in this way. Make them themed or silly. Do team ball games. But why do a race where one child’s performance is rewarded over another?