Good Law Practice launch a EHCR/Supreme Court challenge over toilets

[fromorbit]

After raising over 418K it turns out the GLP's amazing legal case is all about toilets. Details:

https://archive.is/TWRTl

No doubt it will fail like most of their previous legal cases.

Previous thread:
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5336208-good-law-project-suing-the-ehrc-and-bridget-phillipson-letter-before-action?page=1

I agree..what I see before me is a transvestite, plain and simple. The gender is only in your head and as I have no idea what's happening there, nor do I believe in gender identity, transvestite is how I'll call it.
I don't like transexual as that implies you can transition from one sex to another. Transitioning from one gender to another would be possible if you believe in that sort of thing.

🤣

Robin White next week is offering guidance on the SC decision.

ipinclusive.org.uk/events/ip-out-webinar-with-robin-white/

The only guidance possible is to follow it, surely ?

Although narrow in legal scope, the ruling is already having significant – and unintended – effects on the rights and day-to-day experiences of trans and non-binary individuals, as well as non-gender conforming cis (non-trans) people.

I suspect that the effects are very much intended.

non-gender conforming cis (non-trans) people.

That's a bit of a word soup. What does it even mean ? I guess women who wear trousers and are happy to be called "cis" ?

Both of them, then ?

Isn't it just?

I shall just declare myself non-trans and demand things.

I wish the TRAs had dealt with Brexit. I can't see them being impressed with a 52% majority when they think 1% is a mandate.

Right you lot, fess up, who is hoarding all of the funding from the fossil fuel billionaires? 😁

He's such a fucking flute, the article he links to is absolute wibble. Almost every claim is caveated to within an inch of its life, the only figures mentioned are funding of about $170k over 10 years which is probably less than the monthly salary bill for the Good Law Project.

Gosh, I can't keep up. It was the far right funding "anti-trans" stuff, now it's fossil fuel companies?

Either way, thank fuck Joly's here to tell women about the "real problems" they suffer <eyes roll out of head and across the floor>

I'm getting really irritated with the notion of trans panic or trans peril.

I don't need to panic, or feel peril. It's my fucking toilet. Get out.

Actually, some genius whispered in someones ear that it was really Big Oil that was behind everything, and like a dog with a bone(r) the TRA picked it up and ran with it.

Next week, the same person hopes to subtly suggest that behind Big Pharma, behind Big Oil, the real shadowy figures directing the anti trans agendas the world over are the Welsh. But that's only because I have shares in the only company in the UK that makes placards big enough to hold slogans in Welsh.

I may not be taking all this as seriously as I should.

It's yet another round of gay rights/history force-teaming. They're trying to equate it with previous panics about gay people (e.g. the Lavender Scare, 1980s moral panics especially around AIDS etc).

Which one of you gazumped me? I've been trying to tell Jolyon that the Freemasons are behind it all.

My first attempt was the illuminati. However you try spelling that on TikTok.

Indeed.

Also, the irony of feeling so furious you can't get into women's toilets, that you piss all over London, take your clothes off, graffiti statues, threaten women, and suggest we should all die...

... and then complain for England that it should induce any kind of panic or peril !

edited to add that frankly, I would like them to stay out of my spaces purely on the basis of such rank stupidity. Never mind being men.

I mean I don't like to be uncharitable, but Jolyon does seem to be turning into the Piers Corbyn of genderwoo.

That's such a good comparison.

Both middle aged lefty bien-pensant mansplainers, as well. I'm sure it's a total coincidence.

Levi Pay was really interesting on the podcast about the recent Stonewall conference. He described how hard Stonewall worked to have conversations with groups who were against gay rights. He talked about meeting with people and groups knowing they wouldn’t win them over but how, with each conversation, they sought to demonstrate that they were reasonable, logical and approachable. They hoped that when they left ‘the table’ they were one step closer to winning people over.

They weren’t demanding anything or throwing accusations. They were looking for areas to agree on. This gay rights movement was nothing at all like TRAs

🤣

You’d think.

Well quite. And other than the obvious ones - right to life, protection from torture etc - most human rights are qualified and not absolute. So even if there is a legal right to change gender/certificated sex (which there is) it doesn’t necessarily mean it’ll extend to people with sex change certificates getting sll
the rights of actual women. As the Supreme Court more or less said

And other than the obvious ones - right to life, protection from torture etc - most human rights are qualified

They are all qualified.

Well the right to life isn’t qualified, is it?

Not if you are killed in self defence. No penalty for your death then.

Which as I understand it is what free speech enthusiasts want. The ability to act without any consequences.