Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Lloyds bank tripling down

118 replies

Twoshoesnewshoes · 08/05/2025 12:39

Just in case we weren’t clear on their stance…

Lloyds bank tripling down
Lloyds bank tripling down
OP posts:
selffellatingouroborosofhate · 10/05/2025 02:08

Laidbackluke · 09/05/2025 21:30

Feminists led the way in all of this by demanding brands be allies to women. Others have just followed the example set before them.

Personally I don't want my bank, broadcaster, clothing brand etc to try and force a political agenda down my throat.

Life was a lot better when Tesco wanted to sell me eggs rather than re educate me.

Be allies to women or just stop actively discriminating against us? Women were denied mortgages based on their sex in living memory.

healthybychristmas · 10/05/2025 08:38

Laidbackluke · 09/05/2025 21:30

Feminists led the way in all of this by demanding brands be allies to women. Others have just followed the example set before them.

Personally I don't want my bank, broadcaster, clothing brand etc to try and force a political agenda down my throat.

Life was a lot better when Tesco wanted to sell me eggs rather than re educate me.

What on earth are you talking about? Are you saying women insisted that banks treated them equally? Do you think this is a concern?

borntobequiet · 10/05/2025 08:50

Laidbackluke · 09/05/2025 21:30

Feminists led the way in all of this by demanding brands be allies to women. Others have just followed the example set before them.

Personally I don't want my bank, broadcaster, clothing brand etc to try and force a political agenda down my throat.

Life was a lot better when Tesco wanted to sell me eggs rather than re educate me.

You’re too laid back for your own good. Find a better argument.

LeftieRightsHoarder · 10/05/2025 08:55

TheOtherRaven · 08/05/2025 13:16

How 'bout being inclusive of women and homosexuals, guys? Some of us find that rainbow monstrosity actually threatening, being the symbol against us that it is.

Edited

Yes, absolutely. One of our local pubs is always festooned with trans flags. And last time I went in, there were rather threatening signs up on the walls (I forget the exact wording as it was ages ago) telling us to accept everyone as what they say they are.

It’s all about ‘inclusion’, which excludes anyone who won’t worship at their altar.

ArabellaScott · 10/05/2025 09:00

When I hear the word 'inclusion' I know it excludes me.

TheOtherRaven · 10/05/2025 11:31

ArabellaScott · 10/05/2025 09:00

When I hear the word 'inclusion' I know it excludes me.

That needs to be on stickers and t shirts.

In. A. Nutshell.

Peregrina · 10/05/2025 12:45

When I hear the word 'inclusion' I know it excludes me.

Exactly. It's become a shorthand way of saying that many people will be forced to exclude themselves.

BunfightBetty · 10/05/2025 12:53

Absolutely, as soon as I hear the word ‘inclusive’ I shudder. As I know full well it will be a cover for giving extra privileges to those who already have advantage, to the detriment of those who are already disadvantaged. I’ve come to loathe the word, it’s like a visceral reaction when I read or hear it.

ArabellaScott · 10/05/2025 19:07

Yes, it makes my skin all crawl up all over my shoulders. Funny how words can get hollowed out like that. I suppose its doublespeak.

JanesLittleGirl · 10/05/2025 21:20

We are inclusive but, in this situation, we have included you out.

SidewaysOtter · 10/05/2025 22:08

Laidbackluke · 09/05/2025 21:30

Feminists led the way in all of this by demanding brands be allies to women. Others have just followed the example set before them.

Personally I don't want my bank, broadcaster, clothing brand etc to try and force a political agenda down my throat.

Life was a lot better when Tesco wanted to sell me eggs rather than re educate me.

Yeah wims, you brought this on yourselves with your fanciful notions of equality and fairness Hmm

Laidbackluke · 10/05/2025 23:04

SidewaysOtter · 10/05/2025 22:08

Yeah wims, you brought this on yourselves with your fanciful notions of equality and fairness Hmm

How do you feel the methods used by feminists differ from those later used by minority groups?

Thesleepykettle · 10/05/2025 23:36

NeedToChangeName · 08/05/2025 15:29

I'll never understand this. If institutions really want to be inclusive and support their community, where are the flags supporting people with poor health, learning difficulties, caring responsibilities, domestic abuse etc?

Why do they only care about being inclusive to Stonewall?

Completely agree!

SidewaysOtter · 10/05/2025 23:41

Laidbackluke · 10/05/2025 23:04

How do you feel the methods used by feminists differ from those later used by minority groups?

What methods do you think feminists have used? What methods used by minority groups are you comparing them to?

Or are you just another man here to tell us why feminism is bad for women?

doorbellringer2 · 11/05/2025 01:45

NeedToChangeName · 08/05/2025 15:29

I'll never understand this. If institutions really want to be inclusive and support their community, where are the flags supporting people with poor health, learning difficulties, caring responsibilities, domestic abuse etc?

Why do they only care about being inclusive to Stonewall?

Those people are typically poorer and don’t buy financial products, therefore, have no worth to the big institutions.
Let’s be honest - they only back groups who, by feeling included and pandered to, will bank with them and buy financial products to make them money.
None of this is about doing the right thing morally.

They would back a cult who only ate pickled eggs and sang “Love Shack by the B-52’s” if they put their money into their bank and took out life insurance, mortgages, ISA’s etc with them.

BundleBoogie · 11/05/2025 09:48

Laidbackluke · 10/05/2025 23:04

How do you feel the methods used by feminists differ from those later used by minority groups?

What ‘methods’ are you referring to?

How do you feel about the fact that banks actively discriminated against women until they were stopped by a new law in 1974 but even though some persistent banks and credit lenders discriminated against women until much later?

What ‘methods’ did feminists use to obtain fair treatment and access to credit for women that you are comparing to the men that want to access women’s spaces that mask up, throw missiles, physically attack individual women, pour bottles of p*ss over themselves, spend hours lying and whingeing on the radio and refusing all reasonable compromises like third spaces?

Come to think of it, what ‘methods’ did the feminists use to convince the government in 1991 to make it illegal for a husband to rape his wife that compare to the men’s methods described above?

Do you have to try really hard to achieve your extreme levels of misogyny or does it come naturally to you?

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 11/05/2025 10:47

ArabellaScott · 10/05/2025 09:00

When I hear the word 'inclusion' I know it excludes me.

You can replace "me" with your choice of marginalised group:

  • Muslim women.
  • Lesbians.
  • Orthodox Jewish women.
  • Gay men who don't want pussy.
  • Anyone who knows that sex is real and binary. Yes, those are being marginalised right now, by employers, educational establishments, and service providers everywhere.
NeedToChangeName · 11/05/2025 11:11

Yes!

Think that's exactly the reason. Thanks for explaining

And of course TW are bio males, with all the power that bestows...

New posts on this thread. Refresh page