Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

JK Rowlings latest tweet. Just wow!

1000 replies

Imnobody4 · 03/05/2025 20:36

I've copied it in full.
https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/1918747065460420745?t=bPXQ2pY9VAwPPqFR26_vvw&s=19

In light of recent open letters from academia and the arts criticising the UK's Supreme Court ruling on sex-based rights, it's possibly worth remembering that nobody sane believes, or has ever believed, that humans can change sex, or that binary sex isn't a material fact. These letters do nothing but remind us of what we know only too well: that pretending to believe these things has become an elitist badge of virtue.

I often wonder whether the signatories of such letters have to quieten their consciences before publicly boosting a movement intent on removing women's and girls' rights, which bullies gay people who admit openly they don't want opposite sex partners, and campaigns for the continued sterilisation of vulnerable and troubled kids. Do they feel any qualms at all while chanting the foundational lie of their religion: Trans Women are Women, Trans Men are Men?

I have no idea. All I know for sure is that it's a complete waste of time telling a gender activist that their favourite slogan is self-contradictory nonsense, because the lie is the whole point. They're not repeating it because it's true - they know full well it's not true - but because they believe they can make it true, sort of, if they force everyone else to agree. The foundational lie functions as both catechism and crucifix: the set form of words that obviates the tedious necessity of coming up with your own explanation of why you're one of the Godly, and an exorcist's weapon which will defeat demonic facts and reason, and promote the advance of righteous pseudoscience and sophistry.

Some argue that signatories of these sorts of letters are motivated by fear: fear for their careers, of course, but also fear of their co-religionists, who include angry, narcissistic men who threaten and sometimes enact violence on non-believers; back-stabbing colleagues ever ready to report wrongthink; the online shamers and doxxers and rape threateners, and, of course, the influential zealots in the upper echelons of liberal professions (though we can quibble whether they're actually liberal at all, given the draconian authoritarianism that seems to have engulfed so many). Gender ideology could give medieval Catholicism a run for its money when it comes to punishing heretics, so isn't it common sense to keep your head down and recite your Hail Mulvaneys?

But before we start feeling too sorry for any cowed and fearful TWAWites who're TERFy on the sly, let's not forget what a high proportion of them have willingly snatched up pitchforks and torches to join the inquisitional purges. Call me lacking in proper womanly sympathy, but I find the harm they've enabled and in some cases directly championed or funded - the hounding and shaming of vulnerable women, the forced loss of livelihoods, the unregulated medical experiment on minors - tends to dry up my tears at source.

History is littered with the debris of irrational and harmful belief systems that once seemed unassailable. As Orwell said, 'Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them.' Gender ideology may have embedded itself deeply into our institutions, where it's been imposed, top-down, on the supposedly unenlightened, but it is not invulnerable.

Court losses are starting to stack up. The condescension, overreach, entitlement and aggression of gender activists is eroding public support daily. Women are fighting back and winning significant victories. Sporting bodies have miraculously awoken from their slumber and remembered that males tend to be larger, stronger and faster than females. Parts of the medical establishment are questioning cutting healthy breasts off teenaged girls is really the best way to fix their mental health problems.

One seemingly harmless little white lie - Trans Women are Women, Trans Men are Men - uttered in most cases without any real thought at all, and a few short years later, people who think of themselves as supremely virtuous are typing 'yes, rapists' pronouns are absolutely the hill I'll die on,' rubbing shoulders with those who call for women to be hanged and decapitated for wanting all-female rape crisis centres, and furiously denying clear and mounting evidence of the greatest medical scandal in a century.

I wonder if they ever ask themselves how they got here, and I wonder whether any of them will ever feel shame.

https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/1918747065460420745?s=19&t=bPXQ2pY9VAwPPqFR26_vvw

OP posts:
Thread gallery
36
Cvi · 03/05/2025 21:24

It’s well-put, as her posts always are. We already agree with her. Are any detractors going to be moved by this?

Dwrcegin · 03/05/2025 21:25

Thanks for posting this OP. It was a wonderful read.

Girlking · 03/05/2025 21:25

Aurorali · 03/05/2025 21:17

It wasn’t anti-Catholic, it was anti-medieval Catholicism when they used to burn Protestants on the stake. Nothing against the religion at all, the criticism was aimed at the abuses and intolerances of the era.

Well said Aurorali 👌🏻

Beebop2025 · 03/05/2025 21:27

Meanwhile a TRA is now defining trans people as an ethnic group.

https://x.com/Gaynotqueer1/status/1918581801439621160

JK Rowlings latest tweet. Just wow!
Imnobody4 · 03/05/2025 21:27

Now 207K views. It's really raised my spirits.

OP posts:
MrsOvertonsWindow · 03/05/2025 21:27

Wonderful woman and a powerful post Flowers

ToBeOrNotToBee · 03/05/2025 21:28

She's such a Queen!

Ikeameatballs · 03/05/2025 21:28

I fucking love her

user2848502016 · 03/05/2025 21:29

Love her 👏

Marylou62 · 03/05/2025 21:29

Jk Rowling is wonderful.. I'm so glad she's on our side...

Scimitarsandstars · 03/05/2025 21:30

Came off X, so thanks for posting op. Brilliant.

OuterSpaceCadet · 03/05/2025 21:31

I love her so much!

Agree with pp. It's the fundamentalist and cult forms of genderism and any other religion that are the problem. Shame that's the only form of gender ideology ever mentioned by the BBC, Guardian etc.

Boiledbeetle · 03/05/2025 21:31

Imnobody4 · 03/05/2025 21:27

Now 207K views. It's really raised my spirits.

220K

deadpantrashcan · 03/05/2025 21:31

Hwi · 03/05/2025 21:16

She is wonderful. Spot on. Most of my colleagues are pro-trans, anti-Brexit and pro-migration on the outside only, they fear for their jobs and the impact on their children, if they will be bullied for their parents being 'far right'.

Tell them to come over to MN. They can be loud and proud about it here 🫶

myplace · 03/05/2025 21:33

It’s anti Spanish Inquisition, not anti Catholicism.

Genevieva · 03/05/2025 21:34

Thank you. I’m not on X so wouldn’t have seen this, but I admire JKR so much. Her intelligence, fortitude and creative way with words have made such a powerful contribution to getting back the protections women deserve. It’s not over yet, but she’s still there and that makes it just a little easier to be strong.

Genevieva · 03/05/2025 21:35

myplace · 03/05/2025 21:33

It’s anti Spanish Inquisition, not anti Catholicism.

It’s also an analogy. A powerful one. She’s right. Gender ideology is cult-like in its religiosity.

ClairDeLaLune · 03/05/2025 21:37

She is awesome. Really brave the way she has fought this fight for years. So happy she, and common sense, have been vindicated.

MarieDeGournay · 03/05/2025 21:39

Aurorali · 03/05/2025 21:17

It wasn’t anti-Catholic, it was anti-medieval Catholicism when they used to burn Protestants on the stake. Nothing against the religion at all, the criticism was aimed at the abuses and intolerances of the era.

I agree that JKR wasn't being anti-Catholic when she referred to medieval Catholicism 'punishing heretics' - that's just historical fact, not anti-Catholicism.

However I don't think it's accurate to say that medieval Catholicism burnt Protestants at the stake - they burnt 'heretics' and others who were on the wrong side of orthodoxy.
Protestantism came on the scene a bit later than the medieval period - Luther just scraped in before the 16th century arrived, and Protestantism didn't develop until later in the 16th century.
After that, Catholics and Protestants both burnt 'undesirables', including each other, at the stake.

JKR is incomparable - what would we do without her!

Pantah630 · 03/05/2025 21:39

❤️this, incredibly well crafted. 👸

thenightsky · 03/05/2025 21:41

Aurorali · 03/05/2025 21:17

It wasn’t anti-Catholic, it was anti-medieval Catholicism when they used to burn Protestants on the stake. Nothing against the religion at all, the criticism was aimed at the abuses and intolerances of the era.

That's exactly how I read and understood it too.

Joyunlimited · 03/05/2025 21:41

She’s wonderful.

Snugglemonkey · 03/05/2025 21:42

Candlesandmatches · 03/05/2025 20:47

Shame about the anti Carholic rhetoric. But I agree with her message.

It is anti medieval Catholicism. Fair enough,that was pure evil. Most catholics today would acknowledge the medieval catholic church as something they would not agree or identify with. It is not anti catholic.

MeganM3 · 03/05/2025 21:42

Thank you JKR. It must take a lot to do this.

A lot of people have taken the he /she pronoun thingy off their email signature at my work recently. I wonder if anyone else has noticed the same at theirs?

PonkyPonky · 03/05/2025 21:43

I haven’t been on twitter for quite a while but last time I did it was so pro-trans. All of the comments on JKR’s posts a couple years back were angrily and loudly disagreeing with her. I struggled to find any comments like that on this post. Has the tide finally turned? Is common sense washing over the masses finally?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.