If someone cannot safely go to the loo…they are effectively unable to leave their home. They cannot work. They cannot socialise. They cannot participate in political meetings. They cannot attend church. They cannot go to court. They have effectively ceased to exist in public space.
You’re just describing what already happens because of toilet design changes. What about ‘go to school’, Mr Dunt? If you have a school that has cubicles built for privacy (as per DfE standard specification for all toilets) then the most vulnerable children with invisible disabilities, though who self harm, those who are doing drugs which can lead to seizures (spiked vapes), those being assaulted, those having medical emergencies eg. strokes etc are unsafe. Children can literally ‘cease to exist’.
This is really scary for those who have disabilities - there is a knowledge these designs are dangerous.
What is the common reason in schools for changing all the toilets into mixed sex? So they can be gender neutral. And mixed sex toilets designs are always private. Some of the newer schools boasted all gender neutral toilets.
This is why the Supreme Court decision is so important for so many people. The DfE know now that schools have to provide single sex toilets. Now the DfE should go on to say that the standard design for single sex toilets has at least a floor-to-door gap and so private cubicles have to be specifically listed and justified - NOT the other way round. Safety first.
Being in a correctly designed single sex loo could save lives, anyone’s life, at their most vulnerable.
As for assaults, do some research. There’s many FOI requests from police forces about what goes on in public loos and school loos. Rapes are committed by males. No you can’t keep men out, but why would you think private mixed sex spaces are the way forward?
You’ve never thought about women’s or children’s safety? Or the medically vulnerable?
If you want to be really progressive, you need to campaign for mixed sex spaces with door gaps. Good luck with that.