Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Banned from breastfeeding group for objecting to males breastfeeding

632 replies

snickerdoodle1990 · 01/05/2025 21:40

Hi everyone,

I gave birth a few months ago and had some breastfeeding difficulties, so joined a local breastfeeding support group in my city. It’s basically a place to go for support with feeding, plus meet other mums/have a cuppa and biscuit etc. They also have a FB group. It’s become a nice, friendly place to go once every couple of weeks.

Recently, a trans-woman (male) has joined the group asking for support because their wife has not long had a baby and the trans-woman is wishing to breastfeed too, apparently through use of hormones and domperidone (?) to stimulate supply (I did not realise this was possible at all)

I really really object to this person being present in a group of women who are seeking breastfeeding support, trying to come together in their breastfeeding experience and also revealing themselves intimately

I told the group leader my concerns and she basically told me to shove it - said that the group is a safe space for everyone and they support all who wish to breastfeed and that I shouldn’t come back because I am a bigot

I am horrified as are the other women, where do we all stand and what would you do?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
Blueskies25 · 02/05/2025 11:29

SternJoyousBee · 02/05/2025 11:21

But you agree that it is “ahead of us” so not in the here and now? So why pander to a man who is in the here and now, where it’s not possible to ‘breastfeed’ in a way that nourishes the baby? What possible benefit would that have for the baby and their mother who is actually capable of feeding the child?

It is in the hear and now for a minority of trans women but not for men in general

SternJoyousBee · 02/05/2025 11:32

Blueskies25 · 02/05/2025 11:29

It is in the hear and now for a minority of trans women but not for men in general

so you believe ( despite 12 hours ago not even knowing it was a possibility) that transwomen can produce breast milk that can nourish a child ?

how does a transwoman differ from other men?

Blueskies25 · 02/05/2025 11:33

Chariothorses · 02/05/2025 11:25

@MrsOvertonsWindow spot on as usual.
@Helloworlditsmeagain there is a grassroots group called children of ntransitioners.org if you are interested in contacted them

There is a clear troll on this thread, spouting rubbish and being as offensive to women as possible. Always a good idea not to feed trolls.

Not a troll at all,
Anyone with a different point of view in relation to these kind of topics on MN and who goes against the general ( narrow minded ) way of thinking is branded a troll in order to quieten them

The usual bullying by narrow minded individuals

ThePenguinIsDrunk · 02/05/2025 11:36

Blueskies25 · 02/05/2025 10:18

Nothing stopping them from referring to themselves as mothers (not on birth certs) and I doubt there will ever be a law that will prevent them from doing so

You claimed that you were sharing a legal and social definition of mother. They can ID however they want but a TIM cannot legally be a mother.

Blueskies25 · 02/05/2025 11:37

SternJoyousBee · 02/05/2025 11:32

so you believe ( despite 12 hours ago not even knowing it was a possibility) that transwomen can produce breast milk that can nourish a child ?

how does a transwoman differ from other men?

I haven’t heard that other men ( not trans women) were as yet interested in doing it but there may be some out there that are

MrsOvertonsWindow · 02/05/2025 11:39

Blueskies25 · 02/05/2025 11:29

It is in the hear and now for a minority of trans women but not for men in general

There's been enough experimentation on children with experimental drugs and brutal surgery in pursuit of the failed "born in the wrong body" nonsense.
Nobody should be experimenting on babies with male secretions instead of female breast milk.

Apollo441 · 02/05/2025 11:39

Women are discouraged from taking paracetamol when pregnant. Anyone who thinks that you can feed the effluent from the secretions of drug induced male lactations to a baby is more than a few sandwiches short of a picnic. 100% child abuse.

shrinkingthiswinter · 02/05/2025 11:43

It really isn’t likely that the human future near or far includes all fathers being encouraged to take hormones and drugs to grow breasts and lactate. Whatever deranged fantasies that poster has.

(Also a scientist. Not that you need to be one to see this.)

ThePenguinIsDrunk · 02/05/2025 11:48

Notenoughsweeties · 02/05/2025 10:24

There have been threads on MN before about this, though usually about men attending BF groups to support their partners rather than a transwoman thinking about breastfeeding.

These threads usually indicate that lots of the other women do find it off-putting if there is a male present at the group.

It’s easy enough to feed discreetly (if you wish to) when feeding is established, but in the early days when both mother and baby are learning, and latching can be problematic, then it can be more difficult to avoid exposing yourself. And lots of women simply aren’t comfortable with that in male company. Some don’t mind a bit, but lots of women do mind very much.

I do think La Leche and others should take note and perhaps provide a choice of sessions, with some (most in my opinion!) being women only. Otherwise women that really need help will just not show up because of privacy and dignity reasons. Which rather defeats the point.

I can’t see why the men themselves, and their partners, can’t see it as the imposition it is tbh.

Edited

Traditionally LLL core groups were always mothers only.in the last 10 years or so some of their leaders opened their meetings to dads too and then started claiming they had 'always' been mixed. This was part of the issue raised by the 5/6 trustees who got booted as leaders and trustees just for pointing this out and trying to stick to the original purpose

Blueskies25 · 02/05/2025 11:49

shrinkingthiswinter · 02/05/2025 11:43

It really isn’t likely that the human future near or far includes all fathers being encouraged to take hormones and drugs to grow breasts and lactate. Whatever deranged fantasies that poster has.

(Also a scientist. Not that you need to be one to see this.)

Again, to reiterate, there is no way of you knowing this,

You have a very limited way to thinking if you think you can rule out with certainty such possibilities in the future

Soontobesingles · 02/05/2025 11:49

How can you tell transwomen are males? Society falling over itself to cater for their emotional needs ahead of the physical and emotional needs of newborn infants and birthing mothers. When I was pregnant I was so unwell I was unable to work, yet I was not permitted to take medications that would help, not because they were harmful to baby, but because ‘we don’t know if they are’. At every turn the pregnant and postpartum woman is made to put first the needs of the unborn/newborn child. Yet the moment a man ‘needs’ to do something that is quite obviously of no benefit to anyone but himself, and very likely harmful (or at least ‘we don’t know’) so called ‘inclusive feminists’ are up in arms, calling for open-mindedness. Where is the open mindedness towards the alcoholic pregnant woman whose need to drink might cause her baby fetal alcohol syndrome? It’s nowhere, despite that being vastly more common occurance than a breastfeeding transwomam. My god the sexism is off the wall.

Scienceblast · 02/05/2025 11:56

Blueskies25 · 02/05/2025 11:49

Again, to reiterate, there is no way of you knowing this,

You have a very limited way to thinking if you think you can rule out with certainty such possibilities in the future

As a scientist, I really disagree. It would require a clinical trial in which babies are randomly assigned to their breastfeeding mothers, and "breastfeeding" fathers, and to compare the long term health outcomes of mum-fed vs dad-fed children. This would be to prove the lack of negative health effects of drug induced male milk without a clear hypothesis of the benefits. Assuming, of course, that we will ever be able to have some drugs that can induce full lactation in a male.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 02/05/2025 11:59

Blueskies25 · 02/05/2025 11:49

Again, to reiterate, there is no way of you knowing this,

You have a very limited way to thinking if you think you can rule out with certainty such possibilities in the future

Most of us are women on here - we know about babies and breastfeeding. Unfortunately we also know more than we'd like about the emotionally incontinent fantasies of men determined to breach the boundaries of women and children - and now babies.
The mother baby dyad is one of the last boundaries these men are attempting to breach - but will ultimately fail.

OvaHere · 02/05/2025 12:05

Blueskies25 · 02/05/2025 09:55

This is child abuse of a defenceless infant

FFS Don't be ridiculous!

I'm not. There are zero good reasons for a man to involve a newborn infant in his role play. At best the baby gets nothing beneficial from it and at worst it's actively harmed. It absolutely is abusive.

Blueskies25 · 02/05/2025 12:07

Scienceblast · 02/05/2025 11:56

As a scientist, I really disagree. It would require a clinical trial in which babies are randomly assigned to their breastfeeding mothers, and "breastfeeding" fathers, and to compare the long term health outcomes of mum-fed vs dad-fed children. This would be to prove the lack of negative health effects of drug induced male milk without a clear hypothesis of the benefits. Assuming, of course, that we will ever be able to have some drugs that can induce full lactation in a male.

I Disagree, formula was invented as a means of providing nutrition to babies, they were capable of testing that to determine its nutritional value, there is a possibility that the same could be done with milk secreted from a male. You are delusional if you think you could say with certainty that this is not beyond the realms of possibilities

Scienceblast · 02/05/2025 12:13

Not beyond the realm of possibilities, likelihood 0.001%.

AzurePanda · 02/05/2025 12:16

@Blueskies25 breastmilk is demonstrably superior to formula. What benefit to the baby is there in chemically induced lactation from a male?

OvaHere · 02/05/2025 12:22

Blueskies25 · 02/05/2025 12:07

I Disagree, formula was invented as a means of providing nutrition to babies, they were capable of testing that to determine its nutritional value, there is a possibility that the same could be done with milk secreted from a male. You are delusional if you think you could say with certainty that this is not beyond the realms of possibilities

Everything around infant feeding should have the babies best interest front and centre.

So we have naturally occurring female breast milk as the optimum and when that's not possible we have extensively tested formula milk, which both parents (and anyone else) can use to feed a baby.

So what's the rationale for spending time and resources testing whether drug induced male secretions can show any benefit compared to the two tried and tested methods of infant feeding we already have?

In what way would this benefit infants?

It doesn't benefit them in any way at all. It's driven by the wants of a small number of men with an out of hand fetish. These men need to be told no very firmly by the authorities.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 02/05/2025 12:23

Oldermum84 · 02/05/2025 10:28

The OP has not specified what type of group it was. And has not said it was labelled as a single sex group.

And FWIW the group I went to held in cafes wasn't a peer support group. It was one led by a professional lactation consultant who went round supporting with latches etc..no one used a cover that I can think of.

We're all different. You clearly didn't find this an issue. When I was breastfeeding I felt happy to do it just about anywhere, and I was discreet, but the idea of having my latch examined in a public place with random members of the public wandering about nearby leaves me quite aghast. I would also add that the random members of the public might not be too chuffed either. My husband would probably avoid using a cafe at the same times as a group like that.

KnottyAuty · 02/05/2025 12:24

Blueskies25 · 02/05/2025 12:07

I Disagree, formula was invented as a means of providing nutrition to babies, they were capable of testing that to determine its nutritional value, there is a possibility that the same could be done with milk secreted from a male. You are delusional if you think you could say with certainty that this is not beyond the realms of possibilities

Formula milk began before the Cochrane Institute was founded. I’m not sure “invented” is quite right - commercialised is maybe more like it ans supplemental feeding and wet nursing has long history. But there’s a lot of empirical data to show it’s not harmful. There’s a real difference between those situations and experimental male lactation. Someone could test it. But they haven’t. If the person OP mentions was a responsible parent they’d be getting medical advice/support and organising these tests to check they weren’t causing harm. OP doesn’t mention this - and before you say OP can’t know, I’d say thats unlikely because everyone sees and hears everything at a breastfeeding support group. There’s zero privacy.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 02/05/2025 12:27

Blueskies25 · 02/05/2025 12:07

I Disagree, formula was invented as a means of providing nutrition to babies, they were capable of testing that to determine its nutritional value, there is a possibility that the same could be done with milk secreted from a male. You are delusional if you think you could say with certainty that this is not beyond the realms of possibilities

I think we all know who's delusional on this thread. Testing one or two samples is not nearly enough to ensure whether male breastfeeding is a viable alternative to the mother breastfeeding her own baby. This has been explained in detail many times on this thread. It's not just what's in the milk, it's the extraordinary way in which the mother's body responds to the baby's needs and growth. That feedback mechanism couldn't happen in a male body.

hazelnutvanillalatte · 02/05/2025 12:36

KnottyAuty · 02/05/2025 08:37

I think we will find that a new network staffed by all the existing/banned counsellors offering single sex groups will spring up. I’d be surprised if they hadn’t been running underground - bf women are pretty militant!?

The other groups can continue to offer the female exclusionary inclusive service.

Hopefully it will happen but people are worried about being sued/attacked/fined
New mothers and people working at orgs like this already have issues with financial security and employment, so it's easy to threaten/silence them

Fannyannie · 02/05/2025 12:38

I’ve been googling if men can produce ‘breast milk’ and I am very confused.

Can men produce milk suitable to feed a baby like a woman ?

Helleofabore · 02/05/2025 12:40

Fannyannie · 02/05/2025 12:38

I’ve been googling if men can produce ‘breast milk’ and I am very confused.

Can men produce milk suitable to feed a baby like a woman ?

Male people can produce a substance that no one has even adequately tested for chemical contents..

Lucelady · 02/05/2025 12:43

@Dozycuntlaters the world has indeed gone mad.

If someone wants to wear a frock and call theirself Edith I don't give a rats arse but even after the SC ruling TW are still ignoring the law and biology.
I don't agree all trans people have mental health issues but in the case of TW breast feeding I agree.

I work at the highest level in my industry surrounded by men. I don't barge into their men's health events. I don't ask for a prostrate check. It's not being kind, it's delusional and unsafe.