Mass piss-up?

[Litterpicking]

Has anyone noticed the India Willoughby post on X, re-tweeted by For Women Scotland promoting the #pee4me “mass” demonstration tomorrow in Parliament Square in protest at the SC “removing legal protection from women who are trans”. A mass public urination on Easter Sunday will certainly win over the British public.

I’ve seen one like that, here: https://www.facebook.com/100064415844885/posts/pfbid02xTMAqJfLMk8LV15sTH1bPzECM451hh8tTsq1yzDyrPsxBQ8DipUPJciXyNbi8vwol/?

Honestly, could they be more stupid.

Relying on abject victimhood to gain support over the ruling was appealing to quite a few people. Loads of sexist pricks were finding they could stick it to woman under the exciting guise of virtue.

No one can be pretendy noble supporting 'fuck rights' written on women's statues and men getting their cocks out across London in order to piss on everything.

They'll never get it right, because they're so very wrong. But fuck me, do they have to do it quite so spectacularly.

It's a close run thing, but I'm almost more offended by their idiocy, than their degeneracy
.

Significant Developments. Home Secretary and Women's Minister have condemned the vandalism. This could damage the TAs cause inside Labour because it reinforces what our side has always said. Once again Operation Let Them Speak gives us a big win.

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has called the vandalism of several statues in Parliament Square, including one of women's votes campaigner Dame Millicent Fawcett, "disgraceful". Transgender campaigners gathered on Saturday to protest against the Supreme Court ruling that biological sex defines a woman for the purposes of the Equality Act.
Home secretary calls damage to statues disgraceful
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crkx78zlm4po
A spokesperson for Women and Equalities Minister Bridget Phillipson, speaking on the damage to Dame Millicent's statue, said she "utterly condemns the appalling defacement of such an important national monument to the fight for women's rights".
"There is no excuse for this disgraceful criminal damage."

Phillipson and Cooper don't even mention the death threat signs so far. That can't last.

I think this is yet another example of the significant misstep of creating the ‘trans umbrella’.

I expect there were people on this march who are really struggling to find their place in this world and make sense of this through having a trans identity. They understand the ruling as having taken away what they thought was their rights and these rights, or the positioning of them, probably influenced their understanding of themselves as being trans. It is understandable that they may be experiencing pain, anger and fear. They and their loved ones probably joined the ‘marches’ and probably didn’t deface statues, threaten anyone or urinate in public. These are the people that the James O’Briens of this world will give voice to in the media.

The remaining ‘trans umbrella’ people on the march will have included misogynists, people with personality disorders and fetishes. These are the people who were likely to have been breaking the law. These are the people who broke the unspoken agreement that led to transsexuals of old being able to navigate the world peacefully.

I'm not on Twitter, so I could be wrong, but wasn't the march designated as somewhere to go and piss publicly, as a protest?

That seemed to be what India Willoughby was saying, and what Reddit appears to be now regretting.

Seems to have been the entire purpose of it.

Yes. It has been discussed so much on threads for years.

Despite there being so many people who might fall into the non- violent group, and some who will be wanting to find equitable solutions to issues, they don’t seem to understand that if they really are the majority, they could have powerful impact.

So I am often left with the thought that while plenty of people state they respect female people’s rights and deplore the extreme voices, that group may be being less than honest and they want the results the extremists want, or they like to say they disagree but will not engage for fear of being ostracised, lack of time, or something else, or they don’t understand the situation through evidence based thought only emotion or they have a streak of contrarianism where they don’t agree with the extremist gender identity activists but they have a prejudiced view of the women’s groups and don’t want to ever be seen as aligned with them.

More and more I suspect that many of those who weakly denounce the actions of violent extremists actually want the benefits those extremists are campaigning for. Hence the constant blindness of the extreme actions or the constant dismissal of those actions.

It wouldn't surprise me if some politicians might be viewing this as a bit of a gift.

There's nothing like a bunch of transactivists setting light to an entire tanker full of petrol to fuel your reverse ferreting.

We need to talk about the attacks on women by TAs in Sheffield on Saturday too. It isn't just stone women they will attack.

Thread
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5319245-attacks-on-women-in-sheffield-by-tas-on-saturday

Yes that's precisely what it was.

That’s helpful. As a political group, transgender people have had the remarkable privilege to have had the power of coercive control over others with (courtesy of Press for Change and Stonewall) no checks and balances.
To no longer be able to trump every other PC and to have a temporary block in the rapid erasure of women as a legal and social class must require a remarkable reset of their world view.

On her Instagram, India Willoughby is now telling trans women - men…to continue using female spaces and to carry on if stopped 🤦🏻‍♀️ how the hell does she get away with this?

IW is make to the very core despite his assertions otherwise.

He.

When I was a child, back last century, someone would have called the police on a man in the women’s changing rooms who refused to leave. They would probably be charged with voyerism or some such offence and if he insisted he was a woman he’d likely be declared insane. Don’t suppose that’s an option here???

Yes I know…HE. Realised as soon as I’d posted 🤦🏻‍♀️

Recently sent to me from Xland...

Image under review, just a Twitter repost.

Did IW reply about the dog and his nether regions?

Well if he pulls his airport trick again now of marching to the designated women's only toilets to mark his territory, women can just go get the nearest security guard or member of staff. The law is no longer on his side.

I know this is old but I feel obligated to say that pic of the bloke in a dress peeing wasn't taken in London 2025 but in Brussels 2013. It was posted by a parody account on X who said it was Emmeline Pankhurst's statue being peed on but there is no such statue in London. 🙂

Thanks, that’s good to know. Those men look better dressed than the average protester at one of these events tbf.