Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Is it possible to be a feminist and also have some empathy for transgender people today?

1000 replies

HoundOfTheBasketballs · 16/04/2025 20:44

I’m not going to pretend I’m an expert here but everything feels incredibly polarised. Like, either you’re with us or you’re against us.
Is there no middle ground in this debate?
I am, and always have been a feminist, but I know and like people who are trans and non-binary. I can’t be the only person feeling confused and conflicted, can I?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Tartanboots · 17/04/2025 13:52

It's a useful clarification that will protect women who need single sex spaces from trans women who want to access them. It will have zero effect on trans people's everyday lives, except the right wing media will push the erroneous view that trans women have lost and women have won, and all the anti trans comments will come out. Trans people are still legally protected because being trans is still a protected characteristic. They have lost nothing. The trans people i know are just getting on with their lives like everyone else and have no interest in making people feel unsafe. It's useful to have clarity but I think it will unleash a lot of nastiness from people who want to stoke hate and division.

spannasaurus · 17/04/2025 13:56

Tartanboots · 17/04/2025 13:52

It's a useful clarification that will protect women who need single sex spaces from trans women who want to access them. It will have zero effect on trans people's everyday lives, except the right wing media will push the erroneous view that trans women have lost and women have won, and all the anti trans comments will come out. Trans people are still legally protected because being trans is still a protected characteristic. They have lost nothing. The trans people i know are just getting on with their lives like everyone else and have no interest in making people feel unsafe. It's useful to have clarity but I think it will unleash a lot of nastiness from people who want to stoke hate and division.

Is this the kind of thing you are talking about when you say it will unleash a lot of nastiness

https://terfisaslur.com/

TERF is a slur

Documenting the abuse, harassment and misogyny of transgender identity politics

https://terfisaslur.com/

Megifer · 17/04/2025 13:58

I can't empathise tbh because nothing bad has happened to transpeople. they still have the same rights as everyone else 🤷‍♀️

ViolasandViolets · 17/04/2025 14:01

‘Have empathy’ is just another version of BE KIND BiGOT!

Walkaround · 17/04/2025 14:10

Helleofabore · 17/04/2025 13:44

The view of the analogy that you seem to not be able to see is that you told us

"I don’t believe that keeping trans women out of women’s toilets significantly reduces the risk of crime"

Meaning, that you don't see excluding male people who all have the same risk of committing sex crime from female toilets reduces crimes being done to female people in those toilets.

Sure, it doesn't entirely prevent it, just like locking your door won't stop someone who really wanted to enter your property. They will do it anyway. But it is a deterrent that is accepted by society. It also has some legal ramifications for insurance etc.

The analogy is, why do we bother locking the door if it doesn't completely stop crime? We do it because it prevents a certain number of crimes by simply locking the door. It also allows us to know that if someone is in your house when you haven't invited them in, they are there when they are not supposed to be there. Meaning we exclude all male people, regardless of their philosophical belief about themselves.

Because in doing that, we will be better able to prevent some crimes from happening.

You also seem to be ignoring the known facts, and statistically supported facts, that a male with a transgender identity has at least the same risk profile of committing a sex crime as all other male people in the UK. Therefore that group of male people should always have been and should be now treated as all other male people in the UK are treated.

ie. all male people excluded, no special groups created that are treated as exempt from those safeguarding actions.

There is no logic that supports creating a special group of male people to be allowed in, particularly when that group has AT LEAST the SAME risk profile as all the other male people.

It is an argument purely based on emotionally manipulative premises.

It is indeed an argument based on manipulative premises. You might as well say the majority of men are not going to harm women, so women don’t need protecting from men at all.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 17/04/2025 14:13

I’m glad so many posters are calling out the manipulative appeal to female socialisation.

jodolun · 17/04/2025 14:21

Ereshkigalangcleg · 17/04/2025 14:13

I’m glad so many posters are calling out the manipulative appeal to female socialisation.

I agree this is so key. Women are socialised to be kind and always assume the best in people. Like when I was a teenager and a man sat next to me on an empty bus. My gut told me to get up and move away from him as fast as possible but in my head I was thinking, maybe this is just where he always sits, I don't want to make him feel bad, maybe he's lonely, if I move he might be offended yada, yada, yada. Then of course he proceeds to try and molest me, taking my silence as compliance. When in fact I'd been put in danger by my own self doubt and worry about hurting his feelings. We can't keep raising our daughters to be like that. Although look at the reaction when we do change the script whether that is over male access to female spaces or women in general saying no to any man. Look at the back lash, women are too picky, women have over inflated opinions of themselves, women need to be kind and give men a chance, its all the same shit.

TheKeatingFive · 17/04/2025 14:35

spannasaurus · 17/04/2025 13:56

Is this the kind of thing you are talking about when you say it will unleash a lot of nastiness

https://terfisaslur.com/

And can we all be 100% clear that this is all coming from the far left wing.

SmudgeHughes · 17/04/2025 14:38

GCAcademic · 16/04/2025 20:56

I suppose a middle ground would be a third space or an open category.

Hopefully Stonewall will put as much energy into lobbying for those now as it did into trying to systematically colonise or eradicate women's spaces.

When middle grounds have been offered (eg in US swimming), trans-identifying men weren’t having it. They don’t want a middle ground, on the whole, they want women’s spaces, prizes, competitions, organisations etc.

illinivich · 17/04/2025 14:40

I think people are failing to grasp the idea that men can be both vulnerable and it not be appropriate for them to be in womens spaces.

We can see that gay men, old men, disabled men can be vulnerable, but we wouldn't think of allowing them to be in women's public toilets,changing rooms, or on all womens shortlists.

But this understanding fails when the men have a gender identity?

Its because the people arguing for their inclusion, despite saying they know they aren't women, do believe that they arent real men either. Therefore cannot be accommodated in the same way all other vulnerable men are.

But people are born either male or female and people cannot change sex. So there is no such thing as a person who is neither a woman nor a man. Its an unnecessary accommodate they expecting of women.

GCAcademic · 17/04/2025 14:40

SmudgeHughes · 17/04/2025 14:38

When middle grounds have been offered (eg in US swimming), trans-identifying men weren’t having it. They don’t want a middle ground, on the whole, they want women’s spaces, prizes, competitions, organisations etc.

Too bad. They'll have to accept that or just not participate now. At least in the UK.

Datun · 17/04/2025 14:41

@Diverze

if you've been on this board, you must know, full well, that women here make a distinction between middle-aged fetishistic cross-dressers, men with genuine gender dysphoria, and children and teens being sucked into the ideology.

Thread, after thread, after thread about getting this ideology out of schools, writing to every school, the department of education, MPs, the lot.

There's a fag paper between how much time is devoted to children in this, and adults. Children are never far from people's minds. This is Mumsnet after all. (There are two boards devoted entirely to LGBT parents and/or children.)

Furthermore, almost no one here even believes in a trans child. I don't believe in trans ideology at all. No child is trans, no adult is actually trans - they've either got a fetish, or a version of body dysmorphia.

Children have been sucked into a sexist, misogynistic ideology, limiting and restrictive, and that only serves adult men.

But it doesn't help conflating many different strands of this ideology in order to come to single conclusions.

But the one bloody thing you can conclude, above everything else, is that women, their sex class, their spaces, and their very concept is the stand out thing that is being used by bloody everyone, across the board.

We are not tools. we're not everyone's resource.

I've said this before, but I'm going to repeat it, men who say they are trans are not using women spaces, they are using the women in those spaces.

Without the women in them, there would be no validation. The space is just four walls and a ceiling. If all the women left and went to a different space, that new space would become the focus. The presence of the women is crucial. Without them, the space is meaningless.

You've got bloody people on this thread saying 'but it's not all men that want to use you, only some of them,
why are you being so mean!'

Women are not a resource for people to use fucking willy-nilly. We're not therapy, we're not validation tools, and nor are we empathy machines.

Of course we have bloody sympathy for children sucked into this ideology. There are dozens of women here with children who identify as trans.

So, it's not fair, or right to expect a one size fits all reaction from women, the very fucking day after they are finally told after seven bloody years, that they even are women.

And seriously, if anyone is looking for empathy all I can say is read the damn room.

murasaki · 17/04/2025 14:42

SmudgeHughes · 17/04/2025 14:38

When middle grounds have been offered (eg in US swimming), trans-identifying men weren’t having it. They don’t want a middle ground, on the whole, they want women’s spaces, prizes, competitions, organisations etc.

Yes, there was a Masters open swimming event put on. No one turned up.

Datun · 17/04/2025 14:49

Ereshkigalangcleg · 17/04/2025 14:13

I’m glad so many posters are calling out the manipulative appeal to female socialisation.

Is quite extraordinary, isn't it??

Women are the bloody ones who've suffered throughout this entire issue.

We're not the ones who have misled every school, every university, every public department in the land, we're not the ones who pushed the ideology, the drugs, surgery, we're not the ones that have erased the very concept of homosexuality, but we're the ones getting fucking told off and asked for empathy!!

No wonder trans ideology works so bloody well. The most sexist, misogynistic piece of crap in the world has found a ready audience with people who firmly believe that women are second class citizens, and not only do their needs not matter, they've got to empathise with the people who want to remove them!

And this is a feminist board! Fuck me 😂

KnottyAuty · 17/04/2025 14:52

illinivich · 17/04/2025 14:40

I think people are failing to grasp the idea that men can be both vulnerable and it not be appropriate for them to be in womens spaces.

We can see that gay men, old men, disabled men can be vulnerable, but we wouldn't think of allowing them to be in women's public toilets,changing rooms, or on all womens shortlists.

But this understanding fails when the men have a gender identity?

Its because the people arguing for their inclusion, despite saying they know they aren't women, do believe that they arent real men either. Therefore cannot be accommodated in the same way all other vulnerable men are.

But people are born either male or female and people cannot change sex. So there is no such thing as a person who is neither a woman nor a man. Its an unnecessary accommodate they expecting of women.

That is the only way to deal with it from now on. When someone asks where should this vulnerable trans woman go? The response should be - good question where do all the other vulnerable males go?

CherryBlossomPie · 17/04/2025 15:00

GCAcademic · 16/04/2025 20:56

I suppose a middle ground would be a third space or an open category.

Hopefully Stonewall will put as much energy into lobbying for those now as it did into trying to systematically colonise or eradicate women's spaces.

Yea I don't see the issue with creating a transtoilet FFS. It's not a large population of people. And yet toilets became the battleground of this.

Datun · 17/04/2025 15:03

In the 10 years I've been writing on here about this, a third space has been suggested almost on a daily basis.

It's never been wanted.

There's no validation in a space that doesn't have the women in it.

WearyAuldWumman · 17/04/2025 15:03

AshesofTime · 16/04/2025 21:16

The supermarket attack was the e case of Katie Dolatowski who sexually assaulted a girl in the toilets in Scotland. MN won’t let me link it for some reason, but easy to find on Google.

I won’t post the others as the evidence is links posted by transwomen of the actual videos they’ve taken. Vile stuff.

Edit: Sorry that was to @WearyAuldWumman

Edited

Yes, I know - the Kirkcaldy attack happened only a few miles away from me.

This is the report from our local paper:

https://www.thecourier.co.uk/fp/news/courts/819644/mum-of-supermarket-toilet-sex-assault-victim-warns-freed-attacker-could-strike-again/

andtheworldrollson · 17/04/2025 15:04

Toilets are the battleground because it’s a weak area - many toilets are unisex anyway in smaller places and most people shut the door - so it’s the best one for us to be led too

a hospital bed, an open shower or changing room , a sports pitch - these are sidestepped for a toilet to make us look silly I suspect

bigkahunaburger · 17/04/2025 15:06

Diverze · 16/04/2025 21:08

I am middle ground.
I have an adult trans daughter.
She is vulnerable and autistic like so many trans people.
I personally think it is ok to acknowledge that she is a trans female not a bio female and that therefore she has slightly different needs - for example, she will need prostate screening.
It's absolutely ok to acknowledge she is not a bio female. I actually think it's mentally healthier to acknowledge that she was once a boy rather than try to erase that beautiful boy from ever having existed. My personal preference would be for her ID documents to state bio sex M, gender identity F.

Neither of us would want to attend settings where she isn't welcome. I guess women's groups will have to more clearly specify if they are for bio women only, or bio and self-identifying women, which means people can self- exclude more easily on both sides.

There's no need to call her a man, that's hurtful. She does no harm. We both know it's the reality but I guess it's a bit like calling someone fat to their face, or ugly. One can secretly acknowledge the reality but be polite enough not to express it in a hurtful way.

Im sorry for you and your daughter but it isnt the same as not telling someone they are fat or ugly. People who are fat or ugly arent hurting anyone, no impinging on anyone elses rights or safety. Saying your daughter is a man isnt cruel its a fact. Telling them they arent is isnt kindness or polite, its cruel. And its dangerous to women.

Datun · 17/04/2025 15:07

andtheworldrollson · 17/04/2025 15:04

Toilets are the battleground because it’s a weak area - many toilets are unisex anyway in smaller places and most people shut the door - so it’s the best one for us to be led too

a hospital bed, an open shower or changing room , a sports pitch - these are sidestepped for a toilet to make us look silly I suspect

It's my theory that toilets come up so often because it's a quick validation exercise, that you can make every day, almost anywhere.

I absolutely do not believe it's got anything to do with safety, because where are the receipts?

WearyAuldWumman · 17/04/2025 15:08

Springee · 16/04/2025 21:18

So why don't we see this as the criminal fringe? Just as we would any other.

It's the same as any situation where men take up positions which allow them to come into contact with possible victims, and is borne out by the statistics which people have already posted.

The number of dangerous criminals claiming to be trans is much higher than it should be, given that only about 1 per cent of the country's population is trans.

TheOtherRaven · 17/04/2025 15:09

Women through this mad ideology and the invasion of colonisation of their spaces have been excluded, harassed, told they cannot be lesbians and they have to be queer and learn to cope with straight sex because the man wanting them to provide sexual services shouldn't be upset by the news the woman in front of him cannot and does not want to fancy any male bodies even his (shudders at the memory of the wail 'but the mouthfeel of my lady dick will be totally different to a man's!') several have successfully prosecuted rapes and assaults, MANY won't have even managed to report it....

and you're whinging at women to be sorry for the poor men now told to stop using women in women's spaces.

I do not care if the man wanting to use me as a resource - emotional or sexual, how do I know - is lovely or not. I don't want to be used. I am not his mum. I am not his therapist. I don't want him there. I don't care if he is distressed by this, I am not a resource put on this planet for his use. He is going to have to find answers that do not involve me or other women. It is not an unreasonable expectation that he meets his needs without using women.

spannasaurus · 17/04/2025 15:09

Toilets are the battleground because if you steer all conversations to the question of toilets you can ignore the fact that men have been put in womens Prisons and are in womens rape support groups and other more tricky matters.

(My comment is general and not aimed at any particular posters on this thread)

bigkahunaburger · 17/04/2025 15:10

KnottyAuty · 17/04/2025 14:52

That is the only way to deal with it from now on. When someone asks where should this vulnerable trans woman go? The response should be - good question where do all the other vulnerable males go?

KnottyAuty Genius. I never thought of that rebuttal. I am going to be using this one.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.