Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

People with a cervix

342 replies

Globules · 28/02/2025 18:20

This has really annoyed me.

Official documentation from the NHS, aka the national medical professionals, should know that it's ONLY women who have a cervix.

What is this non sentence of all women and people with a cervix?

People with a cervix
OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
eatfigs · 28/02/2025 20:27

Elmo2025 · 28/02/2025 19:32

It’s probably aimed at people who don’t identify as a woman but have a cervix. So the they/them folk. I work with someone who is genetically female but is non binary so wouldn’t identify as a woman but has a cervix.

She must know she's a woman though.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 28/02/2025 20:28

NotBadConsidering · 28/02/2025 20:27

YANBU.

No religious/ideological language should be part of healthcare delivery.

This for the inclusive people at the back.

PerkyTitan · 28/02/2025 20:28

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 28/02/2025 20:24

Are you ok?

I'm good honey, are you 😂 ❤️

DingDongAlong · 28/02/2025 20:30

I don't have any problem with the wording because it includes the term 'women' which is the huge majority of the target audience and an appropriately accurate term to use.

It seems fine to then add in another more generic term like 'people with a cervix' as a catch all for females who identify differently and need to know that cervical screening is also for them. Maybe it also gives an impression that staff at the clinic are expecting to see females who might present differently, which could also encourage participation without judgement.

At the end of the day, cervical screening is all about the early detection of cancer and ultimately saving lives, whether the person identifies as female or not.

Elmo2025 · 28/02/2025 20:31

eatfigs · 28/02/2025 20:27

She must know she's a woman though.

Who knows 😆 none of my business if she chooses to not be one

Elmo2025 · 28/02/2025 20:32

Elmo2025 · 28/02/2025 20:31

Who knows 😆 none of my business if she chooses to not be one

Sorry ‘they choose’!!

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 28/02/2025 20:32

I'm actually disappointed that MNHQ deleted PerkyTitan's post accusing us of being equivalent to racists. It undermines Operation LetThemSpeak when the worst TRA posts are nuked.

Kategreenaway · 28/02/2025 20:32

Elmo2025 · 28/02/2025 20:31

Who knows 😆 none of my business if she chooses to not be one

She doesn't actually have a choice

Devilsmommy · 28/02/2025 20:32

eatfigs · 28/02/2025 20:27

She must know she's a woman though.

Well surely she must otherwise she wouldn't be called a Trans Man. You can only be that if you're not an actual man. So everyone saying she might not know she's a woman, I call bullshit 🤨

decorativecushions · 28/02/2025 20:33

PerkyTitan · 28/02/2025 19:53

Hahahahhaaaaa

I don't personally find it funny that mentally ill people are supported into believing their delusions are true, but you do you!

Nameychangington · 28/02/2025 20:33

Elmo2025 · 28/02/2025 20:31

Who knows 😆 none of my business if she chooses to not be one

If you could choose whether or not to be a woman, there'd be very few in Afghanistan just now I'm guessing.

Being a woman is non optional, you either are or you aren't and you can't choose which and you can't change it.

WillIEverBeOk · 28/02/2025 20:33

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 28/02/2025 20:32

I'm actually disappointed that MNHQ deleted PerkyTitan's post accusing us of being equivalent to racists. It undermines Operation LetThemSpeak when the worst TRA posts are nuked.

Edited

That poster is a truly nasty piece of work. Clearly hates females and is bigoted.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 28/02/2025 20:33

Elmo2025 · 28/02/2025 20:31

Who knows 😆 none of my business if she chooses to not be one

Unfortunately that’s not a choice. We are either male or female and remain so until we die, despite what we think about ourselves, hence why ideology has no place in healthcare.

PriOn1 · 28/02/2025 20:33

Happyhettie · 28/02/2025 20:20

Even if you think that trans men is a mental health issue, is it not still important that they still get the medical care they may need by being able to access a cervical screening test?

I totally appreciate that people have very differing views on trans BUT surely stopping people dying from this fucking awful disease is more important?

I’ve seen someone die a slow and painful death having developed cervical cancer.
She did not have a screening test. If she had, they would have picked it up.
By the time it was diagnosed, the cancerous cells were in her lymph nodes and despite the absolute best efforts and amazing ness of the NHS she died. She wasn’t even 40. Her little children don’t have their mother.

I wouldn’t wish it on anyone.

I really hope this gets moved back to AIBU - we NEED to talk about cervical cancer and the screenings.

I don’t want to stop anyone getting appropriate health care, but I don’t really believe validating people in their untrue beliefs actually helps anyone.

So while I’m glad that the NHS has listened to women, to the extent of reinstating the word women in these messages, I personally can’t wait until the current situation comes to an end.

People have been sold the lie that they can be the opposite sex.

They’ve also been sold the lie that that the whole of society must pretend to accept the untruth, and never mention it which is never going to happen.

As a treatment, it is an out and out failure if it leaves people feeling so fragile every time they are faced with reality. This is obviously a learned response. They have been taught that they are fragile and can’t cope as a tool to try to push the narrative that we must all pander to them.

Personally, I don’t believe transitioning helps anyone. Learning to accept reality, even if you don’t like it much is the only way to genuine peace of mind,

So although I’m happy to see the word woman has made a comeback, I will be truly grateful when it is recognised that there is no need to mention “transmen” or “people with a cervix” because those with a mental health problem about accepting their sex are expected to deal with reality again.

Mrsttcno1 · 28/02/2025 20:34

BobbyBiscuits · 28/02/2025 20:10

@WillIEverBeOk I want NHS info about screening to reach everyone who might need it. That language ensures it does. You know full well that TM do not think of themselves as women. I know you don't agree with it but that's the way they are.

Edited

See this doesn’t really make sense to me. The NHS info about screening does reach everyone it needs to, everybody received an invite to come in for their smear test.

Are you honestly telling me that you think if they don’t include those words a 25+ year old adult, born and registered female, will receive a letter from the NHS to their personal address, with their full name on, GP practice, NHS number, inviting them to book their appointment and they’ll think “ah that’s not for me”? Genuinely?

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 28/02/2025 20:34

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 28/02/2025 20:32

I'm actually disappointed that MNHQ deleted PerkyTitan's post accusing us of being equivalent to racists. It undermines Operation LetThemSpeak when the worst TRA posts are nuked.

Edited

Same, I hate when these ridiculous posts are deleted. They should remain for all to see.

WillIEverBeOk · 28/02/2025 20:35

Nameychangington · 28/02/2025 20:33

If you could choose whether or not to be a woman, there'd be very few in Afghanistan just now I'm guessing.

Being a woman is non optional, you either are or you aren't and you can't choose which and you can't change it.

If you could choose whether or not to be a woman, there'd be very few in Afghanistan just now

Absolutely this! It's a first world social contagion for attention, that's all it is. It's the current generation's Goth. Except being goth didn't mean society was re-ordered around them.

Catza · 28/02/2025 20:36

Nameychangington · 28/02/2025 20:26

That's not how this happens.

For a start there is no 'clean' data for NHS bodies to check who is missing screenings and why. Mens are recorded as women, and vice versa, gender is recorded instead of sex, people are allowed to change their health records to reflect their wishes instead of biological fact. So statistical data which would answer that question doesn't exist, because the trans lobby have been so successful at getting NHS bodies to obscure fact in favour orfideology.

Secondly, the wording might have been approved but it won't have been by a representative panel. If it's anything like my employer (large NHS teaching hospital) it'll have been approved by the LGBTQIA+ group, and no one else will have been asked. There isn't a women's group so you couldn't ask them even if you wanted to. There will possibly have been checks to make sure it confirms to Stonewall's approved wording for their 'diversity' scheme which is very non diverse indeed, and not at all inclusive to women, people with English as an additional language, low literacy, or learning difficulties.

The people with 'lived experience ' of cervical smears are women. Every single person who's had one is female. So the (presumably) female people posting on this thread are the people with lived experience. And a lot are saying they don't want this.

We have just been reviewing access to our service by people from different ethnic communities and this is exactly how the whole process was structured - service statistics, statistics from the community, identifying underrepresented communities and inviting a patient panel to help us redesign our campaigns. A similar process was involved when I was a disability champion in another trust and we had people with disabilities involved in a hospital build project by including them in planning meetings with architects. Maybe there is a disparity among different hospitals but this is the experience I've had with similar projects.

BobbyBiscuits · 28/02/2025 20:37

@Devilsmommy In everything 'male body cancer' related from the NHS?! That is a bit offski.
Maybe it's quite telling. In that TM have more legitimacy than TW because it's an open secret that TW are just doing it for a sexual thrill and don't even think they're in the wrong body?!
Or I guess if it's for a penis, it's visible. Some women and lots of men don't even know what a cervix is?!
Gawd, I don't know now...

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 28/02/2025 20:38

Elmo2025 · 28/02/2025 19:32

It’s probably aimed at people who don’t identify as a woman but have a cervix. So the they/them folk. I work with someone who is genetically female but is non binary so wouldn’t identify as a woman but has a cervix.

Correction: you work with someone who is genetically female and has adopted the very recently coined label 'non-binary'. She may not identify as being female but it's not something you can identify out of. She will remain female to the end of her days and she will always need healthcare from people who know how the patient's sex affects the way their body works.

AubernFable · 28/02/2025 20:39

NotBadConsidering · 28/02/2025 20:27

YANBU.

No religious/ideological language should be part of healthcare delivery.

Some years back, being gay was seen as some kind of outlandish ideology, making it acceptable to ignore or disrespect them and their needs. Now, it’s normal, and homophobes are rightfully condemned. The same is now happening for trans people- it isn’t some fad that’s going to go away.

Devilsmommy · 28/02/2025 20:40

@BobbyBiscuits as someone said upthread, they would never dream of reducing men to their sexual organs but we're only women so hey ho who gives a shit 🤷

Catza · 28/02/2025 20:40

Nameychangington · 28/02/2025 20:33

If you could choose whether or not to be a woman, there'd be very few in Afghanistan just now I'm guessing.

Being a woman is non optional, you either are or you aren't and you can't choose which and you can't change it.

There is actually a pretty established practice of "bacha posh" in Afghanistan.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 28/02/2025 20:41

AubernFable · 28/02/2025 20:39

Some years back, being gay was seen as some kind of outlandish ideology, making it acceptable to ignore or disrespect them and their needs. Now, it’s normal, and homophobes are rightfully condemned. The same is now happening for trans people- it isn’t some fad that’s going to go away.

What's interesting about your contributions to this thread, and those from others on the same lines, is how old-fashioned they seem now. The tide has turned, and within a few years people are going to be looking back at this strange phase and marvel at the collective insanity of it.

MugsyBalonz · 28/02/2025 20:42

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 28/02/2025 20:01

Yet the NHS doesn't say "men and people with a prostate", it just says "men".

Men are not required to pretend to be a subset of their one sex class. This isn't about inclusiveness, it's about subjugating women.

Yet the NHS does say men and trans women, it's right there on their website.

Here is a screenshot of it where it says "the prostate is a small gland found only in men and trans women.

People with a cervix