I'll pick up on this, too, though I didn't see the deleted posts.
I am 'transphobic'.
Being a 'transphobe' means understanding that people can't change sex. Therefore 'trans women' are not women, 'trans men' are not men.
The two sexes are reproductive categories. There are only two.
Woman and man are the names for the two sexes in humans.
Women do not have the physical equipment to produce sperm. No man's body has ever produced eggs. Those things are impossible.
Women and girls have some rights and protections made necessary by the larger, physically stronger male body and the female capacity to gestate. Men have a well-documented tendency to abuse their physical power and to impose unwanted pregnancies on women, so we attempt to protect women from them.
Changing the names we use for the two sexes doesn't alter the bodily facts, so women and girls (female humans) still need some protections from men (male humans).
But changing the names does confuse people's thinking. This is why I don't go along with it.
In an enlightened democracy, no-one has the right to dictate how others must think or the words they use when speaking. Those who try to stop us recognising the facts of human sex are anti-democratic. They call me 'transphobic' for saying so. This is equivalent to calling me a 'thought criminal'.
I'll defend anyone's right to wear what they want, their fundamental rights to work and housing, etc, and even to call themselves any old nonsense that suits them. But they have no right to tell me what to think, to lie about basic human realities, or to threaten women.
Technically, I am a radical feminist so I am also a terf 😎 The 'trans exclusionary' part applies to my feminism, which centres on the realities of living in a female-sexed body. If you deny this reality, you can't be a feminist.