Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

is mumsnet a safe space for me?

1000 replies

rexrabbit · 04/02/2025 21:04

would you say mumsnet these days is a safe space for a non-transphobic lesbian with children to hang out?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
larklane17 · 05/02/2025 11:48

ArabellaScott · 05/02/2025 08:08

All this time, I've been looking at the wrong end of the spider.

Don't mention what millipedes can get up to. I recall someone fainting in the Bluestocking some threads back. 😉

teentantrums · 05/02/2025 11:50

It is quite possible that you will be ribbed for the use of "safe space". Apart from that you will be fine.

Turkeyneck101 · 05/02/2025 11:52

Ingenieur · 05/02/2025 07:08

It's difficult tonknow what the original poster meant, but one of the features of gender identity ideology is a post-modern approach to words that means they no longer describe reality but create it. Words, therefore become pretty meaningless without a shared basis in the real world.

Leasbian could mean homosexual women in the sense most people are familiar with, so female people who are attracted to female people.

But it could mean "women" in the gender identity sense of "whoever describes themselves as a woman" being attracted to other such "women". Lesbian therefore being defined by gender identity, not sex.

As for the non-transphobic bit, lesbians were one of the early demographics to speak out against gender identity and trans identifying men, see "the cotton ceiling". However there are lesbian groups who accept men into their dating pool, for whatever reason, if those men describe themselves as "women".

But given the OP was just another plopper I think it was just to he an edgy adolescent.

Hope that's a reasonable starter!

Thank you for this a very comprehensive answer. It actually makes it a bit clearer for me. It took me longer than it should have to work out that trans men started off as women and trans women started off as men, i was always scared to.ask. I was not being deliberately obtuse. I can totally understand why some people find themselves on the wrong end of someone's tongue unintentionally.

Waitingfordoggo · 05/02/2025 11:56

If @heyhopotato doesn't appreciate the Yougov findings, maybe anecdotes will help?

My DD is 19. She is bisexual and currently in a same-sex relationship. She has friends with trans and NB identities. She loves and respects her friends but she knows what sex they are and why it matters. She believes strongly in preserving single sex spaces where such things matter. Is that transphobic?

notatinydancer · 05/02/2025 11:57

Mumsnet isn't transphobic or homophobic so not sure why it wouldn't be safe ?

heyhopotato · 05/02/2025 11:57

Ereshkigalangcleg · 05/02/2025 10:45

Put it this way, @heyhopotato yours is the fringe belief 🤷‍♀️

on this forum, not real life. in real life all the people I know look down on mumsnet and boycott it for this reason in the same way they avoid x and truthsocial

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 05/02/2025 11:57

I'd also like @Phthia or any of the others who have accused us of transphobia to answer me this:

How is it possible for a human being to actually change sex? Given that our biological sex is immutably set in every cell of our bodies, given that doctors cannot create a functioning, human reproductive system out of tissue from a body of the other sex - or even of the same sex, given that males and females have different bone structures, muscle and fat distribution, endocrine systems, hormones - how can a doctor make a male body have all these female characteristics, or a female body have all the male ones?

Hint - it is not possible. There is no medical or surgical treatment that can make a man into a real woman, or vice versa.

But luckily for the trans rights activists, all the things that they say make a woman, are things a man can buy - make up, hormone inflated breast tissue or silicon implants, clothes - or acquire - mannerisms, long hair.

And it is very notable that these trans women want all the fun parts of what they see as femininity, but don't want the unequal burden of childcare, housework, house admin etc, or the lower wages, poorer health care and poorer health outcomes.

I'd also like to point out that, for centuries, feminism has been arguing for the doing-away with sexist stereotypes - I thought we had won the battle that said that women don't have to perform femininity to be female - they can have short hair, no make up, STEM jobs, traditionally masculine hobbies and interests - and it does NOT make them any less a woman. Now the TRAs want to take us back to the sexist stereotypes, and want to tell kids that, if they don't conform to them, they must submit themselves to mutilating surgeries, cross sex hormones, puberty blockers (like Lupron, which was banned as a treatment for adults because of its side effects - loss of bone density, impairment of brain development etc), and accept a life as medical/surgical patients, rather than a healthy life in a correctly body with whatever likes, dislikes, characteristics they want.

Is it transphobic to be horrified at some people wanting their kids to become trans because they'd rather have a daughter than a gay son? Transing the gay away!

heyhopotato · 05/02/2025 11:57

FallenSloppyDead · 05/02/2025 10:43

YouGov, not DM

They pay people to answer their questions and filter out people they don't want in screening questions so not trustworthy either

FallenSloppyDead · 05/02/2025 11:58

heyhopotato · 05/02/2025 11:57

on this forum, not real life. in real life all the people I know look down on mumsnet and boycott it for this reason in the same way they avoid x and truthsocial

Because you are in a bubble. Look at the YouGov stats quoted above. Or would you rather not have your bubble burst?

FlirtsWithRhinos · 05/02/2025 12:04

rexrabbit · 04/02/2025 21:15

there seems to be a lot of vitriol going around about non het non cis stuff here

Yes unfortunately the women here often face vitriol from a group of posters who are obsessed with the idea that people they do not know anything about are "cis" regardless of how those people actually experience their gender or indeed their lack of gender. Of course that whole belief that most people here are "cis" is based on nothing more than their own prejudices about what type of people would challenge the transgender demand for cross sex privilege. And yes, those posters also do get very het up about it!

teentantrums · 05/02/2025 12:05

heyhopotato · 05/02/2025 09:58

No I wouldn't, it's a hotbed of hate here.

I try to be around to balance it out but it's depressing af. I wouldn't do it if I were LGBTQ or trans myself because it would make me suicidal reading some of the posts.

I take solace in that it's this generation's equivalent of homophobia and that the next generations will look back in horror at such outdated views.

If reading anything on a message board (especially a moderated message board which bans offensive messages) makes you suicidal, then I really suggest that you need psychological help. This is not sarcasm. Resilience is a necessary skill in this world and reading other people's (frankly mainstream) opinions should not push you over the edge.

NoBinturongsHereMate · 05/02/2025 12:09

Kucinghitam · 05/02/2025 09:42

Are you perhaps thinking of Dimetrodon? They're often represented in Dinosaurian illustrations because they look super-cool, but pre-date dinosaurs by tens of millions of years and were actually from the mammal-like-reptile lineage which ultimately led to... us! Shock

That's the badger! Thank you for saving me from having to accost random 4 year olds for answers.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 05/02/2025 12:09

on this forum, not real life. in real life all the people I know look down on mumsnet and boycott it for this reason in the same way they avoid x and truthsocial

Then you're in a little bubble of your own, plus I think you don't know the entire browsing habits of every single person you interact with in day to day life.

That's why self ID isn't popular when no doubt all your friends think it should be the law.

Because most people, outside your alleged bubble, do not believe that a man becomes a woman on his day so. They believe that sex matters in some circumstances.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 05/02/2025 12:10

*say so

FallenSloppyDead · 05/02/2025 12:10

heyhopotato · 05/02/2025 11:57

They pay people to answer their questions and filter out people they don't want in screening questions so not trustworthy either

Edited

You could read this. It explains YouGov's polling methodology
https://yougov.co.uk/about/panel-methodology

Methodology | YouGov

YouGov conducts its public opinion surveys online using something called Active Sampling for the overwhelming majority of its commercial work, including all nationally and regionally representative research. The emphasis is always on the quality of the...

https://yougov.co.uk/about/panel-methodology

letwomenexist · 05/02/2025 12:10

heyhopotato · 05/02/2025 11:57

on this forum, not real life. in real life all the people I know look down on mumsnet and boycott it for this reason in the same way they avoid x and truthsocial

o how we miss their insightful input! 🙄

FranticFrankie · 05/02/2025 12:10

People who ‘look down’ and boycott Mumsnet reminds me of the ones who piled on JKR without reading what she actually said!
‘looking down’ and ‘boycotting’ because someone ‘advises’ them to??

JazzyJelly · 05/02/2025 12:11

heyhopotato · 05/02/2025 11:57

on this forum, not real life. in real life all the people I know look down on mumsnet and boycott it for this reason in the same way they avoid x and truthsocial

Are many of them mums themselves?

Most of the mums I know are very well up on the difference between the sexes. Pushing a person out of you tends to have that effect.

letwomenexist · 05/02/2025 12:11

FranticFrankie · 05/02/2025 12:10

People who ‘look down’ and boycott Mumsnet reminds me of the ones who piled on JKR without reading what she actually said!
‘looking down’ and ‘boycotting’ because someone ‘advises’ them to??

💯

Waitwhat23 · 05/02/2025 12:17

Turkeyneck101 · 05/02/2025 11:52

Thank you for this a very comprehensive answer. It actually makes it a bit clearer for me. It took me longer than it should have to work out that trans men started off as women and trans women started off as men, i was always scared to.ask. I was not being deliberately obtuse. I can totally understand why some people find themselves on the wrong end of someone's tongue unintentionally.

It's not just you. There was a deliberate push by activists to make definitions unclear and many people don't know -

murrayblackburnmackenzie.org/2023/08/07/clarity-matters-how-placating-lobbyists-obscures-public-understanding-of-sex-and-gender/

AsTreesWalking · 05/02/2025 12:17

JanesLittleGirl · 04/02/2025 21:52

Most of MN is pretty safe. The pet/animal topics can get a bit heated. Just stay away from AIBU. Their motto is:

We don't carry rifles
We don't carry lead
We just carry hatchets
To bury in your head.

FWR is a choir practice in comparison.

True. But then again I've been to some very heated choir practices...

lcakethereforeIam · 05/02/2025 12:17

Well at least we've established that ankylosaurs are dinosaurs. I already knew dimetrodon weren't <smug>. Still cool as fuck though.

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 05/02/2025 12:20

AsTreesWalking · 05/02/2025 12:17

True. But then again I've been to some very heated choir practices...

Me too - the toxic atmosphere in one choir has put me off joining any choir for good.

Whereas I am still on MN. Says it all.

Helleofabore · 05/02/2025 12:24

heyhopotato · 05/02/2025 10:41

I don't care to read Daily Mail polls so I wouldn't know what they say.

Good thing you don't have to read DM polls. You can read YouGov polls instead.

In fact ... I will deliver the results to you here so you don't even have to go to find them. Here you go:

Here is the latest YouGov figures if potato or any other readers are interested in reading them. YouGov have been tracking the results to the same questions in the UK since 2018 and added a couple of more that they now track too.

How lucky are we to have this to consider.

Here are the questions and their results over time.

In the following questions a transgender woman is someone who was biologically male at birth, but now identifies as a woman. A transgender man is someone who was biologically female at birth, but now identifies as a man.

Do you think transgender women should or should not be allowed to…
Take part in women's sporting events?2018 in italics, 2022 in [brackets vs 2024
Should be allowed 27 [16] 11% 2018 - 2024 this is decrease by 16%
Should not be allowed 48 [61] 74% 2018 - 2024 this is increase by 26%
Don't know 25 [22] 15%. 2018 - 2024 this is decrease by 10%

Use women's changing rooms? 2022 in brackets vs 2024
Should be allowed 42 [34] 27%. 2018 - 2024* this is decrease by 15%
Should not be allowed 33 [43] 56%. 2018 - 2024 this is increase by 23%
Don't know 25 [23] 17%. 2018 - 2024 *this is decrease by 8%

Use women's toilets? 2022 in brackets vs 2024
Should be allowed 46 [38] 33%. 2018 - 2024 this is decrease by 13%
Should not be allowed 30 [41] 51%. 2018 - 2024* *this is increase by 20%
Don't know 23 [21] 16%. 2018 - 2024 this is decrease by 7%

Use women's refuges? 2022 in brackets vs 2024
Should be allowed 47 [39] 31%. 2018 - 2024 this is decrease by 16%
Should not be allowed 27 [36] 47%. 2018 - 2024 this is increase by 20%
Don't know 26 [25] 22%. 2018 - 2024 this is decrease by 4%

No question making it clear that when a male person has or has not had surgery was asked in 2018, but here is how this too has changed since 2020:

Do you think a transgender woman who has not had gender reassignment surgery should or should not be allowed to...

Use women's changing rooms? 2020 in italics, 2022 in [brackets] vs 2024
Should be allowed 26 [25] 20%. 2020 - 2024 this is decrease by 6%
Should not be allowed 46 [48] 62%. 2020 - 2024* *this is increase by 16%
Don't know 28 [27] 18%. 2020 - 2024 this is decrease by 10%

Use women's toilets?
Should be allowed 31 [29] 26%. 2020 - 2024* *this is decrease by 5%
Should not be allowed 41 [46] 58%. 2020 - 2024 this is increase by 17%
Don't know 27 [25] 16%. 2020 - 2024 this is decrease by 11%

Here is the data behind the 2018

d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/Transgender_data_2018.pdf

2020

https://d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/Transgender_data_2020.pdf

2022

https://d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/Internal_TransgenderIssues_220720_final_extraXbreak_FINAL.pdf

2024

https://d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/SexMatters_Gender_241219_ZMwbM2T.pdf

Here is the latest YouGov tracker information on whether people want gender neutral toilets or separate single sex toilets:

A new poll reveals that support for mixed-sex toilets is at its lowest level in five years.

Do you think public spaces should have separate toilets for men and women, gender neutral toilets, or both?
Separate toilets for men and women. 59%
Gender neutral toilets as well as separate toilets for men and women. 32%
Gender neutral toilets only. 5%
None of the above. 1%
Don't know. 3%

https://yougov.co.uk/topics/society/trackers/support-for-separate-toilets-for-men-and-women-and-gender-neutral-toilets-in-public-spaces

And Sex Matters commentary on it.
https://sex-matters.org/posts/updates/support-for-gender-neutral-toilets-falls/

https://d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/Transgender_data_2020.pdf

BackToLurk · 05/02/2025 12:30

heyhopotato · 05/02/2025 11:57

They pay people to answer their questions and filter out people they don't want in screening questions so not trustworthy either

Edited

One of the YouGov polls referred to was commissioned by Pink News

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.