So they are repeating the main problem, ie the inclusion of men who identify as women. New ‘leaders’, same bullshit.
They include any men, irrespective as how they identify.
What is interesting (depressing) is they seem to think they are doing something brand new and positive.
But in fact all they are doing is ignoring exisitng feminist activism, and seem to think that somehow out of banal MSM reporting will organise women to stand up for women. And these women are welcome to bring husbands, brothers, sons, whoever who are supportive.
So it comes back to the fact that the level of knowledge or sharing of information about women's groups / activists that have developed over years, decades are just unknown.
It shows how effectively the patriarchy keeps women divided from each other.
All this group does is show how superficial and unaware many women (well everybody) are that feminist activism and analysis has a history.
And women only is born out of lived experience.
Let them re-invent the wheel.
But in the end it is the old divide and rule.
Rather than worry what they might be up to we need to focus of supporting groups who are being effective, and supporting groups like LWS (even if you dont like all she says) because she is actively giving women a voice, and too often men (and the police) are intimidating them.