Having seen your further posts, I can appreciate that you're trying to engage in good faith, which is unusual here for posters sharing your views.
However, you don't seem to be giving a lot of thought to what you're posting, which means your posts essentially come across as 'why can't you all just be kind'. We've seen where be kind gets us, and we've had enough of it.
I'm not trying to play linguistic point scoring with you, but I do want to clarify my point above because you seem to have missed it again: I didn't say that you, specifically, alluded to or described a trans genocide. I said that by commemorating something that doesnt happen, ie trans murder in Scotland, you were lending credence to the trans genocide narrative. A narrative which is being used to dismantle women's rights.
You're right that these discussions are difficult to have, and because of that, nuance is important.
I note that in the face of the evidence, you've changed your position from 'trans people have been murdered in Scotland, you can't say they haven't', to 'it's an international day of remembrance that Scotland should support' - which is a different argument. Kudos for taking the facts on board - when presented with inconvenient facts lots of people try to ignore them!
However. I still find it inappropriate that a public building is using public money to support this day, even though it's an international day, when many more days which are relevant to the local demographic are not supported. It's giving an importance to the day that it does not deserve to be shown by that public body (disclaimer- I'm not saying that any murders are unimportant or deserve to be ignored, we're talking specifically about the context, not the subject itself) and its indirectly supporting the dismantling of women's rights for reasons explained above.
I have just finished reading the excellent book 'The women who wouldn't wheesht' (Christmas present from the husband) and I recommend it as a study of how insular and biased the Scottish political establishment has become. To me, the flying of this flag is symptomatic of that phenomenon.
In a subsequent comment, you also noted that you believe trans people get additional celebration and remembrance days on top of the LGBT ones because:
i think probably because some gay/lesbian/bisexual people don't advocate for the trans community and there is a divide
Maybe consider why some LGB people, like some straight women, don't see it as their business to advocate for a community (nb yes not all individual trans people) that is actively harming them and their cause?
Edit for typo