Thanks for that Times article..
'One of the defendants, Jean-Pierre Maréchal, 63, has become known as Dominique’s “disciple”, having drugged his own wife and raped or attempted to rape her at least a dozen times with Dominique between 2015 and 2020.
Maréchal’s wife told investigators that she did not want to press charges as a civil complainant against Dominique or her husband, the father of her five teenage and adult children, because he had always been a good father and husband.'....
How can it be that this man cannot be prosecuted without a civil case? This man should not be near any woman .. why are the rapists of adult women not treated like rapists of children? Why is rape of adult women not seen as abhorrent? and why are rapists not seen as a potential danger to all women? Why are women not protected from these dangerous men?
The other quote that shocked me... I will look for it in Fremch.. the translation was 'there is rape, and there is rape without intention, there is no rape'... does this mean that rape without intention is not rape? So the defence is.. I did not frame it in my mind as rape so therefore it is not rape??!? When we will get to the stage that sex without explicit consent is rape and is a punishable crime with consequences that these men cannot be in the presence of women without supervision and cannot be allowed to have contact with other men who are deemed to be ar risk of being a rapist.
When will we stop minimising rape.. stop saying because no one died or it was not a child, it is OK. The underlying message seems to be that many men think the purpose of women is sex and how that sex happens is irrelevant. The red lines are children and death.. anything else is 'natural' and it is the fault of femminists who put ideas into the heads of women that they should have autonomy over their own bodies.
The other quote in the article.. someone will get hurt, stabbed or their house burned... why is the hurt of women excused and minimised? And why are these hateful comments repeated by journalists without someone pointing out that these are serious crimes, rape is grievous and heinous offence, that the minimisation of the sexploitation of women is deeply harmful and should be a matter of concern at all levels of society, not minimised so families can move on and recover from the incident.
When we link the posession of violent images of rape, sexual harassment and pushing the boundaries of women with the potential to rape? When will we recognise that the gateway crimes of sharing images and upskirting need to be treated seriously. If we speed, it is accepted that we are at risk of progressing to the more serious crime of death by dangerous driving so we are sanctioned with fines, reeducation and driving bans, this should be in place for crimes of misogyny.
Sex without explicit consent is rape. Rape is a crime, in all it's forms. Anyone who commits rape is a pontential danger to all women.
Arggh .... ranty...... angry... .. fury..... and preaching to the converted... grateful to have this space to vent.