And again, yes, it was rude. Yet the poster, freedomdogs I responded to had just completely twisted what I had said, into something that they then felt they could proceed to label bigoted and not just once, and actually told me that I hated even the fact that trans people existed which was completely false and told me to calm down when I was not furious.
Strangely, no poster who has reprimanded me for pushing back, has told that poster that they were rude too.
And I have not said that you were all one poster. So perhaps you are mistaken ?
Welcoming someone doesn’t mean that you, general you, cannot point out the weaknesses in their argument if their argument lacks substance or they, a general they, have just posted a falsity that has been posted and discussed repeatedly on a thread but that new poster can’t be arsed to read the thread before plopping down the post.
Do you, personally, believe that your view should be given affirming support just because you post in a public forum? Even if your view is not supported by evidence?
And generally, if a poster is posting their opinion which immediately displays a prejudiced view of the posters on a board, why should posters on a board accept being accused of being mean, hateful and bigoted, ignorant, far right, whatever the accusation ? Why should that accusation be accepted when it is based on whether a poster has accepted or rejected compliance of the other poster’s purely philosophical belief?
And why should a poster be welcomed if what they contribute to a thread amounts to censure of other’s language rather than contributing anything of substance that engages with the topic?