So a poster comes on here at this point in the long, careful, well-researched, and sometimes well-pissed-off, discussion about eligibility in women's boxing, and expects us to repeat it all here now so as not to put them to the trouble of having to read stuff we've written - sorry, no.
If you don't want to engage with the discussion on this thread in its entirety, that's up to you, but we're moving on, WotsYourExcuse, and we don't need a dragging anchor. A maritime reference, not rhyming slang.
The future of women's amateur boxing may depend on this new body that's being formed, World Boxing - not to be confused with the World Boxing Organisation, or the World Boxing Association, or the World Boxing Council. Maybe Item 1 on the agenda should be 'A more original and less confusing name'!
WB is still in development, and could go the way of 'inclusivity' in women's boxing, like the IOC - you are a woman if you say you are and who are we to stop you boxing other women, regardless of your biological sex?
or the way of the WBC which stated '"Women are different to men in several ways - muscular, bone structure, hormonally, so it was decided never to allow a woman to fight a man." (WBC president Mauricio Sulaiman) and instead proposed a separate category for transgender boxers for 'safety' reasons, implying that they take 'sex' to mean biological sex, not self-identified sex.
Applying pressure to World Boxing to go down the route of fairness and safety is probably the only way to capitalise on the Khelif/Lin cases and move this issue forward, instead of circling back endlessly over previous discussions.