Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Imane Khelif

805 replies

LHayday · 14/08/2024 20:07

Just reading the thread on here for the first time. What I fail to understand is why so many contributors are so desperate for her to be a man. Someone who has lived their entire life as a woman. Beggars belief.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
28
RainWithSunnySpells · 21/08/2024 09:18

It's not about gender identity, it's about sex.

A simple way to solve the sport situation and preserve the female catagories below.

In the vast majority of people XX = female and XY = male.
So the cheek swab test is used as a screen. If a person with a DSD is identified, this can then be looked at in more detail. Once the DSD is known, it is clear if the person has male advantage or not. This can be done on a case by case basis. Anyone with male advantage does not compete in the female catagory, they can compete in the open/male catagory. I would rename all male catagories 'open'.

quantumbutterfly · 21/08/2024 09:19

Gnashbee · 21/08/2024 09:10

Even if you're fully on board with JKR and hate trans woman, it seems like a very bad idea to rely so heavily on chromosome tests to decide someone's gender, as it throws up a whole array of other issues if we have to use test-tubes to decide if someone's a man or a woman. I don't know if such a condition exists, but what happens when an actual man with XX genes decides to compete against women? What basis would anyone have to say he shouldn't?

Plus, how would anyone know their own gender for sure until it was tested?
Even apart from woman's sports, it seems to me that any random woman could have some previously unknown condition that meant she had XY genes, that still wouldn't make her a man.

Have you read JKR's posts? Which one said she hated trans women? Or did someone tell you she's a transphobe and you thought 'that's good enough for me'?

Then again, you've commented here without parsing the reams of previous debates, or even rtft.

Igneococcus · 21/08/2024 09:19

No woman would consider having XX chromosomes ‘private medical information’

The moment a woman is visibly pregnant her XX status becomes public knowledge, except maybe for people with a complete lack of common sense.

MarieDeGournay · 21/08/2024 09:25

So a poster comes on here at this point in the long, careful, well-researched, and sometimes well-pissed-off, discussion about eligibility in women's boxing, and expects us to repeat it all here now so as not to put them to the trouble of having to read stuff we've written - sorry, no.

If you don't want to engage with the discussion on this thread in its entirety, that's up to you, but we're moving on, WotsYourExcuse, and we don't need a dragging anchor. A maritime reference, not rhyming slang.

The future of women's amateur boxing may depend on this new body that's being formed, World Boxing - not to be confused with the World Boxing Organisation, or the World Boxing Association, or the World Boxing Council. Maybe Item 1 on the agenda should be 'A more original and less confusing name'!

WB is still in development, and could go the way of 'inclusivity' in women's boxing, like the IOC - you are a woman if you say you are and who are we to stop you boxing other women, regardless of your biological sex?
or the way of the WBC which stated '"Women are different to men in several ways - muscular, bone structure, hormonally, so it was decided never to allow a woman to fight a man." (WBC president Mauricio Sulaiman) and instead proposed a separate category for transgender boxers for 'safety' reasons, implying that they take 'sex' to mean biological sex, not self-identified sex.

Applying pressure to World Boxing to go down the route of fairness and safety is probably the only way to capitalise on the Khelif/Lin cases and move this issue forward, instead of circling back endlessly over previous discussions.

Helleofabore · 21/08/2024 09:26

Gnashbee · 21/08/2024 09:10

Even if you're fully on board with JKR and hate trans woman, it seems like a very bad idea to rely so heavily on chromosome tests to decide someone's gender, as it throws up a whole array of other issues if we have to use test-tubes to decide if someone's a man or a woman. I don't know if such a condition exists, but what happens when an actual man with XX genes decides to compete against women? What basis would anyone have to say he shouldn't?

Plus, how would anyone know their own gender for sure until it was tested?
Even apart from woman's sports, it seems to me that any random woman could have some previously unknown condition that meant she had XY genes, that still wouldn't make her a man.

Gender or sex?

I don’t believe that JK Rowling hates trans people either, nor any posters here. But I understand your point. The issue with sports though is very simple.

Has an athlete got XX chromosomes?

Does an athlete produce testosterone from testes that their body processes?

If you have read the thread (or any of the about 10 threads about this issue) you would have seen links to and discussion around the IBA tests. These tests established chromosomes, that were not XX. The medical advisory team then established that these athletes had been through male puberty and had male pubertal advantages. That was the basis for their decisions and they released statements about this. They were clear about this.

So, you are right. It should not be just about chromosomes. And the decision made by the IBA was not solely based on chromosomes.

Helleofabore · 21/08/2024 09:28

A dragging anchor? I love that I can learn so much on FWR.

Gnashbee · 21/08/2024 09:28

quantumbutterfly · 21/08/2024 09:19

Have you read JKR's posts? Which one said she hated trans women? Or did someone tell you she's a transphobe and you thought 'that's good enough for me'?

Then again, you've commented here without parsing the reams of previous debates, or even rtft.

I think we're well past having to argue this when JK is calling trans women blokes, denying the Holocaust, and supporting people who say they want trans people sterilised. The fact she's currently busy deleting her tweets calling an Olympic-gold-medal-winning woman a man should show you even she knows she's gone wrong somewhere.

TheKeatingFive · 21/08/2024 09:32

Gnashbee · 21/08/2024 09:28

I think we're well past having to argue this when JK is calling trans women blokes, denying the Holocaust, and supporting people who say they want trans people sterilised. The fact she's currently busy deleting her tweets calling an Olympic-gold-medal-winning woman a man should show you even she knows she's gone wrong somewhere.

Well firstly 'transwomen' are men. Basic statement of fact. T

Secondly, no she's not a holocaust denier, don't be an imbecile.

Thirdly, what? Sterilise who?

Don't come on here and talk nonsense. You'll do much better. Like we by

theilltemperedclavecinist · 21/08/2024 09:33

Gnashbee · 21/08/2024 09:28

I think we're well past having to argue this when JK is calling trans women blokes, denying the Holocaust, and supporting people who say they want trans people sterilised. The fact she's currently busy deleting her tweets calling an Olympic-gold-medal-winning woman a man should show you even she knows she's gone wrong somewhere.

You do know that medical transitioning destroys fertility, right?

Helleofabore · 21/08/2024 09:36

Gnashbee · 21/08/2024 09:28

I think we're well past having to argue this when JK is calling trans women blokes, denying the Holocaust, and supporting people who say they want trans people sterilised. The fact she's currently busy deleting her tweets calling an Olympic-gold-medal-winning woman a man should show you even she knows she's gone wrong somewhere.

She uses the sex based language for male people, and particularly for those who abuse her.

Do you believe a woman is allowed to use accurate sex based language to discuss her abuse and her abusers? Or do you support the abusers and their rights to coercively control what language the women they abuse use?

Please do post the evidence of the denials of the Holocaust? And that she supports people who want anyone sterilised?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 21/08/2024 09:38

Plus, how would anyone know their own gender for sure until it was tested?

You can't test for "gender". You test for sex.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 21/08/2024 09:39

Please do post the evidence of the denials of the Holocaust? And that she supports people who want anyone sterilised?

It's just bad faith twisting of words.

Helleofabore · 21/08/2024 09:39

Gnashbee · 21/08/2024 09:28

I think we're well past having to argue this when JK is calling trans women blokes, denying the Holocaust, and supporting people who say they want trans people sterilised. The fact she's currently busy deleting her tweets calling an Olympic-gold-medal-winning woman a man should show you even she knows she's gone wrong somewhere.

The fact she's currently busy deleting her tweets calling an Olympic-gold-medal-winning woman a man should show you even she knows she's gone wrong somewhere.

No tweets deleted from her timeline on this topic. I just checked. They are all still there.

Where the fuck did you get that bit of falsity?

FlirtsWithRhinos · 21/08/2024 09:42

Always the same handful of accusations isn't it? It's so obvious this stuff is coming from genderist echo chambers not reading a variety of sources and perspectives followed by first person thinking, assessing, cross-examination and drawing ones own conclusions.

RufustheFactualReindeer · 21/08/2024 09:44

AncientAndModern1 · 20/08/2024 11:42

An easily disproval libel such as a billionaire accusing a female athlete of being biologically male would be the dream retirement scenario. Better than a lottery win. And IK has already had tests done at a major Paris hospital that would be acceptable proof in any court. Handy!

Absolutely!

for the absence of doubt i would be as happy as larry if she called me a man on twitter!

i could really do with a large sum of money…mainly to prove that i will not be affected by riches

(i will absolutely be affected, i would make an awful rich person)

Helleofabore · 21/08/2024 09:45

I am rather intrigued now as to where the misinformation that Joanne Rowling was deleting her tweets has come from. Because it is so clearly very easy to check, yet someone just accused her of this.

Or is this like Marsh declaring that she is off Twitter because she is ‘scared’ of the investigation when she had indicated that she was going on holiday? FFS, some
people really don’t seem to be able to sort falsehoods from truth.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 21/08/2024 09:48

Or is this like Marsh declaring that she is off Twitter because she is ‘scared’ of the investigation

Sorry @Helleofabore who is Marsh? I went out last night and my brain is not fully awake yet!

RufustheFactualReindeer · 21/08/2024 09:49

Gnashbee · 21/08/2024 09:28

I think we're well past having to argue this when JK is calling trans women blokes, denying the Holocaust, and supporting people who say they want trans people sterilised. The fact she's currently busy deleting her tweets calling an Olympic-gold-medal-winning woman a man should show you even she knows she's gone wrong somewhere.

Proof or you are chatting shit

RufustheFactualReindeer · 21/08/2024 09:50

I mean you are actually chatting shit but i do like to be fair

RufustheFactualReindeer · 21/08/2024 09:51

Transwomen are blokes so i will give you that one…

Shortshriftandlethal · 21/08/2024 09:52

Gnashbee · 21/08/2024 09:10

Even if you're fully on board with JKR and hate trans woman, it seems like a very bad idea to rely so heavily on chromosome tests to decide someone's gender, as it throws up a whole array of other issues if we have to use test-tubes to decide if someone's a man or a woman. I don't know if such a condition exists, but what happens when an actual man with XX genes decides to compete against women? What basis would anyone have to say he shouldn't?

Plus, how would anyone know their own gender for sure until it was tested?
Even apart from woman's sports, it seems to me that any random woman could have some previously unknown condition that meant she had XY genes, that still wouldn't make her a man.

You cannot do a test for what is in someone's imagination......which is where the concept of gender lives. Chromosomes tests are the foolproof method for determining sex.

I'm not sure you are being entirely genuine with this post, as it displays so much obvious confusuion as to be almost a parody.

Helleofabore · 21/08/2024 09:56

Ereshkigalangcleg · 21/08/2024 09:48

Or is this like Marsh declaring that she is off Twitter because she is ‘scared’ of the investigation

Sorry @Helleofabore who is Marsh? I went out last night and my brain is not fully awake yet!

The fragrant Jeffrey.

Released a video saying JK was scared and that is why she is not tweeting at the moment. Errr. No. Marsh… She indicated she was going on holiday.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 21/08/2024 09:56

Ah yes, him. Thank you!

illinivich · 21/08/2024 10:01

There are a lot of people who can't define what a woman is, let alone imagine there are ways to determine sex, yet believe theres a need for womens sports categories.

Its back to we dont know what a woman is, but he definitely is a woman.

ScoldsBridle · 21/08/2024 10:07

Helleofabore · 21/08/2024 09:28

A dragging anchor? I love that I can learn so much on FWR.

Oh yes that is fabulous! I’m going to use that - the fact it also functions in a Cockney rhyming slang way is brilliant. Who said it originally on the thread?