Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Thread 2: TWO “Female Boxers” Set To Compete At Paris 2024 Were Previously Disqualified From Women’s World Championship For Having “XY Chromosomes”

1000 replies

Signalbox · 03/08/2024 10:07

A second thread for those who wish to continue the discussion.

Thread 1 can be found here...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5129412-two-female-boxers-set-to-compete-at-paris-2024-were-previously-disqualified-from-womens-world-championship-for-having-xy-chromosomes?page=1

TWO “Female Boxers” Set To Compete At Paris 2024 Were Previously Disqualified From Women’s World Championship For Having “XY Chromosomes” | Mumsnet

Surely this cannot be true. In boxing of all sports. I thought boxing had told men they needed to compete with other men? *”Two athletes competing at...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5129412-two-female-boxers-set-to-compete-at-paris-2024-were-previously-disqualified-from-womens-world-championship-for-having-xy-chromosomes?page=1

OP posts:
Thread gallery
96
NoBinturongsHereMate · 03/08/2024 23:09

I've seen a lot of 'but she's got a womb' in the definitely-a-woman arguments circulating. Does anyone know where this came from? It's not as if most people's internal organs are common knowledge.

I also thought 'even a pregnancy test' was interesting wording.

alittleprivacy · 03/08/2024 23:09

Plasmodesmata · 03/08/2024 21:39

I'm noticing the same on Facebook too. Really random stuff but all full of disinformation.
Although I also have one feminist friend who has shared the story, and one TRA friend who has shared the other side of the story. So maybe that's why the algorithm has decided I want to see more - although it's only showing me the other side.

Yeah but that's Facebook for you. A few years ago twitter would have been the same and we'd have been treading a fine line on being able to discuss it here too. I've temporarily deactivated Facebook because of it. I can't bear it anymore.

Snowypeaks · 03/08/2024 23:12

NoBinturongsHereMate · 03/08/2024 23:09

I've seen a lot of 'but she's got a womb' in the definitely-a-woman arguments circulating. Does anyone know where this came from? It's not as if most people's internal organs are common knowledge.

I also thought 'even a pregnancy test' was interesting wording.

I think at one stage somebody looked up Swyer's Syndrome.

alittleprivacy · 03/08/2024 23:12

NoBinturongsHereMate · 03/08/2024 23:09

I've seen a lot of 'but she's got a womb' in the definitely-a-woman arguments circulating. Does anyone know where this came from? It's not as if most people's internal organs are common knowledge.

I also thought 'even a pregnancy test' was interesting wording.

It's literally come from someone googling women with a y chromosome and having a top result like this. They don't even open the link, just see that women with Swyers have a uterus, put 2 and 2 together and get minus 8000.

It's obvious that Khelif couldn't have Swyers. If they did more than the most basic of 'research' they'd learn that osteopenia is comorbid. And if they cracked out a dictionary, they'd learn that means brittle bones. And then maybe, just maybe if they still remembered how to make their brains engage, they'd realise that a career of world class boxing would be out of the question. And the Khelif is a man.

Thread 2: TWO “Female Boxers” Set To Compete At Paris 2024 Were Previously Disqualified From Women’s World Championship For Having “XY Chromosomes”
NoBinturongsHereMate · 03/08/2024 23:20

I suspected as much, but wondered whether people were extrapolating from some specific statement I'd missed rather than random googling.

Dominoodles · 03/08/2024 23:22

There's a lot of debate online over whether this person is male, female, intersex, whatever. The way I see it, they are either intersex, in which case they should not be competing against females, or they are female with high testosterone which works like doping, in which case they should not be competing against females.

SabrinaThwaite · 03/08/2024 23:29

As you can’t be ‘female with high testosterone’ (female levels of T are well defined), and doping would be picked up in competition, so that brings us back to a male DSD.

Caerulea · 03/08/2024 23:31

BlessedKali · 03/08/2024 21:28

As I scroll down Facebook, every third or fourth post is from some group that I don't follow, and it is a propaganda piece saying the Imane Khelif is female and any questioning is a bigot. Over and over this message is repeated. Someone has paid for those posts to appear under my nose, and those posts will be appearing on many other people's feeds, too. Some people won't question the message, it will just sink in.

Who is paying for this propaganda?

Mine too! It's crazy! Post after post, all the same sentiment

alittleprivacy · 03/08/2024 23:31

Dominoodles · 03/08/2024 23:22

There's a lot of debate online over whether this person is male, female, intersex, whatever. The way I see it, they are either intersex, in which case they should not be competing against females, or they are female with high testosterone which works like doping, in which case they should not be competing against females.

There is no such thing as intersex in humans. There are people with Disorders of Sexual Development but they are still either male or female. Khelif has a Y chromosome and is male. He most likely has a condition like 46XY 5 Alpha Reductase. Men with that have internal testes and a micro penis. Without genetic testing, boys with this condition are often raised as girls by people who think women are just a lack of penis. He would have gone through a mostly normal male puberty and would have known he was male from around 14. He has all of the usual male advantages in sport.

If he was raised as a girl that must have been a horrific experience. I can't imagine the pain and confusion of literally being assigned the wrong sex at birth. But he shouldn't be in any sport against women, especially boxing.

duc748 · 03/08/2024 23:32

But tv and film has suggested to them that tiny women who can beat up men who look like The Rock without breaking a sweat because they learned a few martial arts skills, actually exist in reality.

But do (most) women really buy that? I find it hard to credit. As PP have said, every mother knows her 13-15 year old sons are much stronger than she is.

Dominoodles · 03/08/2024 23:33

alittleprivacy · 03/08/2024 23:31

There is no such thing as intersex in humans. There are people with Disorders of Sexual Development but they are still either male or female. Khelif has a Y chromosome and is male. He most likely has a condition like 46XY 5 Alpha Reductase. Men with that have internal testes and a micro penis. Without genetic testing, boys with this condition are often raised as girls by people who think women are just a lack of penis. He would have gone through a mostly normal male puberty and would have known he was male from around 14. He has all of the usual male advantages in sport.

If he was raised as a girl that must have been a horrific experience. I can't imagine the pain and confusion of literally being assigned the wrong sex at birth. But he shouldn't be in any sport against women, especially boxing.

I'll be honest, I've heard so much conflicting information and not been able to find enough official stuff to formulate an opinion on what sex this person is. But I have been able to come to the conclusion that I don't think it's right for them to compete against females.

alittleprivacy · 03/08/2024 23:37

I do think it's worth bearing in mind that people with disorders of sexual development are probably going through a pretty tough time due to this guy. They have been having their conditions discussed, misunderstood and lied about all week. And in the past organisations for people with DSDs have stressed that they are either men or women, not some sort of in between.

Dominoodles · 03/08/2024 23:37

SabrinaThwaite · 03/08/2024 23:29

As you can’t be ‘female with high testosterone’ (female levels of T are well defined), and doping would be picked up in competition, so that brings us back to a male DSD.

Genuine question, why can't you be female with high testosterone? 1 in 3 women have PCOS, which is often characterised by increased hormone levels and leads to issues, but they're still women.

alittleprivacy · 03/08/2024 23:38

Dominoodles · 03/08/2024 23:37

Genuine question, why can't you be female with high testosterone? 1 in 3 women have PCOS, which is often characterised by increased hormone levels and leads to issues, but they're still women.

Because women with high testosterone still fall way below male levels

Dominoodles · 03/08/2024 23:38

alittleprivacy · 03/08/2024 23:38

Because women with high testosterone still fall way below male levels

Ahh, OK

duc748 · 03/08/2024 23:40

My understanding is, and I don't think I'm wrong, is that there has never been a baby born in human history who could not be defined as male or female, DSD's nothing withstanding, on current medical knowledge. Two kinds of people: big gamete people, and small gamete people. And even though they might be born with some bits missing, or damaged (just like people can be born with only one arm or one leg), they are still recognisably male or female.

SabrinaThwaite · 03/08/2024 23:42

Dominoodles · 03/08/2024 23:37

Genuine question, why can't you be female with high testosterone? 1 in 3 women have PCOS, which is often characterised by increased hormone levels and leads to issues, but they're still women.

Because women with PCOS have levels of T within the normal female range - obviously at the upper end - but nowhere near male levels.

duc748 · 03/08/2024 23:48

And because it's pretty shitty to bring women with PCOS into the argument.

PatatiPatatras · 03/08/2024 23:48

The IOC have backed themselves into a corner. A bit like the flat earthers who proved the earth was curved.

If they want any tests that determine eligibility into the female category, they'll have to define it and have it run independently. The result will possibly make them look stupid but it will definitely fix "what a woman is" for the ioc - a whole new can of worms.

The ioc now has no choice but to hide behind patient confidentiality and double down to let misinformation help the imagination run riot. They need to let this become political as opposed to biological or they'll end up with egg on their face.

Cheeky buggers.

Dominoodles · 03/08/2024 23:51

duc748 · 03/08/2024 23:48

And because it's pretty shitty to bring women with PCOS into the argument.

That's why I asked. The comment I was replying to said you can be female with high testosterone. I have PCOS and high testosterone for a woman, so I was asking clarification on that comment because surely nobody would say we're not women because of that?

Dominoodles · 03/08/2024 23:52
  • can't be female

Typo

Zeugma · 03/08/2024 23:52

For those who would like to give their Olympic viewing an added twist…you can now play "spot the male participants" in Female Judo, Taekwondo, wrestling and Greco-Roman wrestling...Sharron Davies has said that she has spoken to female competitors in these combat sports who have said that there are males in these female sports

I'd already heard about unease around at least one person in women's judo, and another footballer….

Incidentally, someone upthread mentioned the mixed relay. It’s very instructive to watch this 2019 race in which one woman (Poland's Justyna Święty-Ersetic) ran the last leg against 7 men. She was way out in front at the baton change and then totally obliterated by America's Michael Cherry. Funnily enough, mixed relays now keep to all-women and all-men at each leg - for just this reason. Male advantage in action (starts at about 7.50 into the race).

Mixed 4x400m Relay Final | World Athletics Championships Doha 2019

The United States broke the world record for the second time in as many days in the mixed 4x400m as Michael Cherry anchored the squad to a new benchmark of 3...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rUUWYOqxR84

ASportsMum · 03/08/2024 23:56

And linked to the comment about the IOC being backed into a corner, I've just been looking up why the men boxing tonight were not wearing protective headgear. It's apparently no longer mandatory for male boxers in the Olympics because research has indicated that concussions are more likely if the boxer wears it. However, this research was apparently only conducted on men, and there are insufficient data to know the risks for women (why does this not surprise me?). This is apparently why you see the male boxers in the men's event fighting without headgear and the boxers in the women's event wearing it.

So, women boxers may be competing in kit that actually increases risk of head injury (we just don't know) while they are being hit, especially by stronger men.

The powers-that-be are promoting the research that concussions are more likely for men if they wear headgear but in Paris, because of the rules, they now have men who have to wear headgear because they are competing in the women's event. Presumably these men are at lesser risk because their opponents are biological women so don't hit as hard.

It's hypothetical since Khelif and Yu-ting are in different weight categories but what if a biologically male boxer were to draw another male boxer in the women's competition? The IOC would be forcing these men to do something with an acknowledged risk to males.

SabrinaThwaite · 03/08/2024 23:56

Just watch tonight’s mixed 4 x 100 medley relay in the swimming - the women in the first (backstroke) leg were completely outpaced by the men.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.