I was coming here to post precisely that. I'm surprised they are still afloat, albeit only just if the crowd funder is anything by which to judge. There can have been no outcome as yet, as surely this would have been publicised. But every time this supposed 'charity' comes to public notice - always for entirely the wrong reasons - there's a huge public outcry followed by radio silence.
Why are they teflon-coated? And where do they get their power, support and protection from? In the wake of the Cass report these questions are all the more urgent, and in the light of her conclusions I'll content myself simply by saying that these people should be nowhere near children.