Agreed. Cass is limited to one area with a narrow frame of reference and terms of reference.
For the rest…
Glinner has frequently said he thought, "This (prisons, women losing jobs etc.) will be the issue that wakes everyone up," and yet, every time, he was disappointed.
There have been so many times since the mid 2010s when posters have declared, "The tide/tanker is turning," only it hasn't.
This has been long in the planning. It will take a long time to recapture what women and children have lost, never mind convert our rights into things that are inalienable rather than a social nicety that can be withdrawn from us at someone's whim. (Where "someone" includes those that approach the status of vexatious litigants because they have been able to use the police as concierge service that enacts their airing of grudges and grievances.)
This is an election year. Trust no-one.
What matters is what happens in health and social care, in education, in the criminal and offender management systems, in the Civil Service, in NGOs and the third sector. What will the staff do there? What happens with media reporting? What will happen to domestic abuse refuges? What is the legacy of the arts centres and theatres that decided women can't have single-sex facilities?
What will happen to employers' workplace policies? To all those advisory groups for PCCs and boards that declare, in public, that GC beliefs are 'terrorism'?
This is a relative skirmish in what will be a decades long engagement.