I am active in fighting gender ideology, which I despise, and normally argue against Dadjokes ( I’m a constant name changer). But on this he has a point.
This research is, if I read it correctly and I’ve only quickly skimmed the abstract so may be wrong, not on a patient group. So you can’t conclude from this that those who get as far as being assessed as suitable for medical transition would have the same rate of return to gender congruence.
It does however, add another piece of data to support those who argue that children should not immediately be affirmed, and that there is high correlation between being gay and lesbian and experiencing gender incongruence.
I imagine there are all sorts of complications of doing this work with a patient group given the indoctrination, for want if a better word, targeted at children and families. Obviously that work should still be done, but the methodology in this research also offers an interesting angle.
i do think, whatever side of the debate one is on, that there is a need to honestly look at what data actually evidenced or not. Nor should what someone says be instantly dismissed just because you are normally opposed to them.