I don't know why you (and others) are repeatedly posting JBs article, if not to make a point about "disproportionately Muslim" and "people being scared of racism".
If you genuinely don't know, I'll try to explain (again).
JB said that in the geographical area that her first article in 2007 related to, "many of the members of grooming gangs were of Pakistani origin". You've read her article so you know that.
She also said that she had been trying to get stories about this published for years before her first article was published in 2007. You've read her article so you know that.
She said that editors were unwilling to publish her articles "because some editors feared an accusation of racism". You've read her article so you know that.
She said:
I was concerned that the story would only be told by racists. The British National Party (BNP) had been already been claiming that nasty Muslim “paedophiles” were preying on innocent white girls.
Her fear, as a feminist and a journalist, was that this silence from the mainstream press would leave a gap which would be filled by racists wanting to make this a race issue (even though in many cases the abusers were white men). This is the point she was making and that I have been trying to make to you.
My point, to reiterate, is that silence from the press and a failure of the authorities to tackle the source of the problem (abusive men of all ethnicities), effectively helped the far right by allowing them to step in and be seen by some as the only people willing to protect the young female victims of these abusive men.
It is my belief that KJK was trying to make the same point as JB, but she made it somewhat less eloquently and less clearly, which as we have seen in your interpretation of what she said, was open to misinterpretation.