Not sure it is really worth commentating, but all this bit about not supporting other groups, etc., is extra ordinary given that KJK has been no platformed by all the head girls of feminism.
I am, like some other posters, one of those who isn't the hugest of KJK fans, but an more than appreciative of the work she does, the opportunities to provide women who aren't professional speakers the opportunity to have a voice, and of course the ever so succinct use of a dictionary definition.
Feminism at is best reaches all part of the female estate! KJK and LWS have a more than valuable role.
But also as far as I remember she has said she isn't a feminist, and even if she was, there are no rules of membership of feminism.
She is far more of an asset to womanhood and our rights than the useless puppets that the MSM tries to tell us are representing feminism, or those who lecture us about not aligning with men who say they support us, being kind and so on.
In my mind she if far more like Germaine Greet who was never ever part of any organised network of women and as an ingrained individualist is, as the years have gone by, far better remember than the "sisters" who acted in the approved way of the time.
As has been suggested up thread, it does seem this thread was maybe not in good faith, but far from achieving its aims has ended in another KJK appreciation thread with the added benefit of memories of cheese!