So now we demand consistency from them.
Here is the finding that is the basis of the Press Gazette report
https://www.bbc.co.uk/contact/ecu/today-radio-4-22-august-2023
It states: "In relation to impartiality, however, the ECU considered it could only be understood by listeners as meaning that trans women remain male, without qualification as to gender or biological sex, and that, even if unintentional, it gave the impression of endorsing one viewpoint in a highly controversial area. It therefore upheld this aspect of the complaint."
So this raises a big question for the BBC. In many of those reports on the recent Scarlet Blake it could only be understood by listeners that that person was female without qualification. This therefore endorses the OTHER viewpoint in a highly controversial area.
Or indeed so would any story about a transgender woman where there is no explicit reference to their biological sex.
So that means I assume that the BBC will now uphold all of those complaints where it misled readers/viewers into thinking Scarlet Blake was female
Right? Right BBC?
This is a highly significant findings which cuts both ways surely thanks to your recognition of the need to balance viewpoints for impartiality in a highly controversial area.
Thanks for the precedent, we will now cite this finding in any future complaint to the BBC where stories endorse just one viewpoint in a highly controversial area.
I actually think they have shot themselves in the foot with this.
Oh yes and if you read the fortnightly complaints bulletin for last week you will see the trans breast milk story had the most complaints
https://www.bbc.co.uk/contact/complaint-service-reports