Well that was a thing of beauty!
As pps say - loved that when White said LGBT Sunak responded with a belief that the LGB were relevant and the focus, and White had to correct him that when White said LGBT White only in fact meant the T and didn't see the LGB as including anyone relevant. Great. The government have clocked that LGBT means a political TQ position to the lobby and nothing else. Like actually caring about or representing same sex oriented people.
Loved the use of same sex. Specific and clear and those people not erased and buried under other louder groups .
Loved that a question about TQ was responded to with regard to women and children's needs and equalities. What a turn up when every question women have asked about women for years has been met with 'well the main and most important thing about women's needs is to prioritise male people'.
Clear, calm, well explained, a view point of sensitivity, tolerance and equality for all without harm to others. I'll vote for that.
And that the TQ lobby and White are displeased by this says it all. If that pov 'destroys trans rights' then the 'right' being sought is to have women and children's rights destroyed and subordinated, and the harms to them counted as nothing worth caring about. Not equality but primacy. That isn't a right anyone with any morals or ethics, or with a typical social and balanced viewpoint, can justify seeking for.