Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Brighton shows why you shouldn’t vote Labour - Julie Burchill (and a mention of IamSarah)

112 replies

IwantToRetire · 28/01/2024 01:36

The pleas of many local parents to rid our schools of pesty wokeness have fallen on deaf ears. Classrooms have become petri dishes for social experiments in defiance of parental wishes. Is it really possible that, a few years ago, one school in Brighton, labelled as ‘the coolest state secondary in town’, once had as many as 40 children who did not identify with their sex at birth with another 36 saying they were ‘gender fluid’? Or is this social contagion, as eating disorders are now often understood to be, among sad teenagers desperate to identify as something or anything, rather than feel lonely? Whatever it is, the council are hindering rather than helping these confused adolescents. Sometimes it seems as though there is an almost sadistic element to the way right-on teachers torment distraught parents. Isn’t it odd to send people who think diversely off for re-education, or re-‘training’?

And another thing, after boasting that ‘diversity is strength’, isn’t it odd to send people who think diversely off for re-education, or re-‘training’? This is what the Sainted Bella did after Councillor Alison Thomson retweeted posts supporting JK Rowling and the feminist Germaine Greer. Even though the culprit apologised unreservedly, Chairman Sankey frowned, ‘I have also taken the decision to remove Councillor Thomson from her lead role on city centre renewal while further investigation is carried out and subject to her completing training.’ Because nothing says not being qualified to work on renewing city centres like believing in women’s rights.

But not even the re-training of the hapless Thomson was enough for one Green councillor, Chloe Goldsmith. She asked how Labour would ‘meaningfully demonstrate’ to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, questioning/queer, asexual plus (LGBTIQA+) people that the party would stand up for them. This brought another avalanche of woo-woo affirmation from Labour, with the situation continuing ad infinitum.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/brighton-shows-why-you-shouldnt-vote-labour/

Brighton shows why you shouldn't vote Labour

I surely wasn’t the only Brighton citizen who breathed a sigh of relief when the Green council was turfed out by Labour last May.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/brighton-shows-why-you-shouldnt-vote-labour

OP posts:
lifeturnsonadime · 28/01/2024 09:05

Gosh this thread is boringly predictable.

Wouldn't it be wonderful if the Labour Party would just do the right thing by women and children on this issue? Then left leaning women wouldn't have to be scolded or be accused of being closet Tories, or bigots or whatever for simply pointing out what a disappointment the left is on this.

PriOn1 · 28/01/2024 09:12

I fear Labour are going to room home to a victory with their anti-women policies still largely intact. My only hope is that Starmer, despite being the consummate fence sitter on this topic, does actually see the way the wind is blowing and will diplomatically quash it, without ever appearing to do anything much.

I really can’t tell whether he’s properly useless (as he appears to be) or whether he will turn out to be much cannier than I am currently giving him credit for.

Either way, I don’t think I can bring myself to vote Conservative, Labour, SNP or Green, which doesn’t leave me with many options unless there’s an SDP or independent in my area.

lifeturnsonadime · 28/01/2024 09:15

My only hope is that Starmer, despite being the consummate fence sitter on this topic, does actually see the way the wind is blowing and will diplomatically quash it, without ever appearing to do anything much.

He's not going to sit up and listen whilst some women wave all this through because 'not as bad as the Tories'.

I can't understand women who do that. It's so tribal.

ArabellaScott · 28/01/2024 09:16

Waitwhat23 · 28/01/2024 08:53

The discussion above has made me think of another poster a while ago who did the usual 'it never happens, you're all just embroiled in a culture war!!', was shown various examples of what was being discussed and then slunk away claiming 'well, I've never read about it in the Guardian'....

I'm never going to vote Tory and the political choices are different (if depressing) here in Scotland. But given the essentially two party situation in England (I'm guessing Wales has some additional parties) and the vows from many, many people that they would never under any circumstances vote Tory, all Labour has to do is be less shite on this particular issue to romp home on a massive victory.

But Labour won't. Adherence to an ideology is simply too important.

It's baffling.

It is baffling.

Where I am it's a stark choice between Tory and SNP.

RufustheFactualReindeer · 28/01/2024 09:21

I can see some are getting quite rattled for getting called out on this

no one is getting rattled

RufustheFactualReindeer · 28/01/2024 09:24

Apologies rayon

i see people have already said that!

should have refreshed 🤦🏻‍♂️

ArabellaScott · 28/01/2024 09:26

Rattle and refresh, Rufus!

Dinoland · 28/01/2024 09:27

roarrfeckingroar · 28/01/2024 08:42

In what world is the Spectator a "hate rag"?!

Google Rod Liddle.

EasternStandard · 28/01/2024 09:28

Dinoland · 28/01/2024 09:27

Google Rod Liddle.

Which press do you rate @Dinoland?

RufustheFactualReindeer · 28/01/2024 09:32

ArabellaScott · 28/01/2024 09:26

Rattle and refresh, Rufus!

I wish i rattled, i mainly wobble

Dinoland · 28/01/2024 09:35

To be honest I'm pretty disillusioned with them all.
I'm disappointed with the Guardian for their stance on GC, the sacking of brilliant women's rights journalists and the sacking of Steve Bell which was utterly shameful.
I find the Times distinctly OK. Their coverage of culture (which I have a particular interest in) is very poor.
The Telegraph doesn't align to my political views.

Dinoland · 28/01/2024 09:35

(That was in response to @EasternStandard)

teawamutu · 28/01/2024 09:36

SidewaysOtter · 28/01/2024 08:22

I can see some are getting quite rattled for getting called out on this

Oh I’m not tired of anything, I just disagree with you and bored of being scolded by those who think they have the right to tell others how they should think and vote.

For the record, I WANT to vote Labour. I’ve voted Labour for years. But I will not vote for them all the time they think men can be women and I have genuine concerns that they will make life worse for women in terms of our rights, safeties and even identities.

So I may well vote Tory, much as that pains me. Want to be angry about that? Then be angry at the Labour Party who sold down the river all the women who would otherwise have voted for them. I didn’t leave Labour, Labour left me.

I agree with every word of this.

I too want to vote anything but Tory. On being asked for their position on women's rights and self-ID, the Lib Dem candidate made vaguely realistic noises but made it clear she would toe the party line; the Labour candidate didn't deign to respond.

The Tory MP is responsive, firmly GC and actually takes action.

It's a very blue constituency so my vote counts for basically nothing anyway, but for me it's either spoil the ballot or opt for the choice that will stand up for women.

Alltheprettyseahorses · 28/01/2024 09:38

Why are people getting upset because Labour's massive flaws are being exposed? What will they do when political discussion turns from violent anti-woman activism to how their economic policy is no different from that of the Tories and how they will in fact undertake even worse crackdowns on disability benefits? Tribalism is a terrible thing. It's a grotty political party, not a footie team or a pop star - it's really strange to get upset because the truth isn't being hidden. Are we all supposed to lie because your identity and sense of self depends on being perceived as left wing even though the basis for your belief in that ie unquestioning universal adherence to a political party is fundamentally wrong? Myself, I'm spoiling my ballot.

teawamutu · 28/01/2024 09:41

Well, quite, seahorses.

Why is the answer always for women to shut up, rather than Labour to just STOP BEING FUCKING USELESS on this issue?

Alltheprettyseahorses · 28/01/2024 09:41

Dinoland · 28/01/2024 09:27

Google Rod Liddle.

Alternatively, google Owen Jones.

RethinkingLife · 28/01/2024 09:41

Labour are so pathetic on this issue but at least they won't cause as much endless misery to women through austerity, allowing Brexit, trashing the economy especially impacting the poorest especially in jobs over represented by women, destroying the NHS, running our schools and on and on.

I would be pleased to be wrong and await the manifesto but, afaict, Labour

  • is committed to continuing austerity
  • will do nothing to walk back Brexit
  • was or is leading councils who fought to deny women back payments for dragging out the equal pay dispute
  • responsible for the state of the NHS in Wales…
I'm emphatically among the politically dispossessed because Labour moved away from me. I grieve for it and, to some extent, post Giles Udy's work, I grieve for my naivety.
lady69 · 28/01/2024 09:42

Julie B will be loving this thread! This is why she writes and is particularly good at it. Thank goodness for her.

ArabellaScott · 28/01/2024 09:42

RufustheFactualReindeer · 28/01/2024 09:32

I wish i rattled, i mainly wobble

I resemble that remark! On a good day, I waddle.

CharlesChickens · 28/01/2024 09:44

MissLucyEyelesbarrow · 28/01/2024 07:12

Yeah, this.

Which papers brought GC issues to the public's attention, and helped stop rapists in women's jails, men in women's sports etc? Was it the Guardian, Indy and Mirror? Nope, it was the Spectator, Times and Telegraph. (Honourable mention for the New Statesman, but only while Helen Lewis was editor)

You do you, but I'd rather not wait for ideological purity while my rights are being given away. Janice Turner's take-down of Maria Miller in the - gasp - Murdoch rag that is the Times, single-handedly stopped the self-ID being made law, IMO. I'll take that over tumbleweed from the Guardian.

I agree .

AlphariusOmegron · 28/01/2024 09:46

Dinoland · 28/01/2024 07:34

I don't understand how you can turn a blind eye to the other articles published in the spectator just because they also back a cause you back. I don't think I could ever read the Spectator as it happily publishes Rod Liddle articles.
I don't think I'll ever forgive the Tories as most of them voted against equal marriage. What about austerity, the destruction of public services and the NHS, the pressure on teachers etc etc.
Maybe I'm being to black and white but I'll fight the GC fight without siding with the right thank you very much.

The left has entirely abandoned you though. I’m happily centre left. I’ve got a coffee coated with “fuck the tories” written on it and a badge saying “never kissed a Tory”. I was born in 1978 and brought up to hate them.

but …. The left is entirely ideologically captured by this fantasy which harms children, women and society (and men for that matter). There is no recourse except to tell those on the left they will lose us until this is addressed fairly. I wrote to Keni and told her this is a vote winner for me and I’d never had said that 5 years ago.

this is the ideologues fault. The left takes us for granted at its peril.

Dinoland · 28/01/2024 09:46

@Alltheprettyseahorses I also don't like Owen Jones.

ArabellaScott · 28/01/2024 09:46

teawamutu · 28/01/2024 09:36

I agree with every word of this.

I too want to vote anything but Tory. On being asked for their position on women's rights and self-ID, the Lib Dem candidate made vaguely realistic noises but made it clear she would toe the party line; the Labour candidate didn't deign to respond.

The Tory MP is responsive, firmly GC and actually takes action.

It's a very blue constituency so my vote counts for basically nothing anyway, but for me it's either spoil the ballot or opt for the choice that will stand up for women.

Perhaps voting according to individual MP rather than party allegiance is increasingly a good idea. Diversity of ideas within a political party is probably healthy to an extent.

This doesn't necessarily help much, depending on local candidates...

Slothtoes · 28/01/2024 09:48

Thank you for your excellent post RayonSunrise
exactly right. I feel like a Cassandra endlessly posting ‘but what have the Tories actually DONE, in law, to support or even further promote women’s rights?’Rather than just said in some newspaper soundbites?’ And being told as if this was an answer, that we are lucky we don’t have a Labour government.

.. the only answer I can think of is: the Tories have given us the £5 GRC.

The Tories were confident that self ID was right, they ignored women’s protests and wanted to bring in self ID. We were a hair’s breadth away from getting it in the UK until more powerful figures than us (at that time mostly women who wouldn’t have been Tory voters anyway) must influenced them.

I don’t believe that any major UK party will try making that specific legal change now in the next few years because of the gathering opposition there has been to it.. too much sunlight and fresh air and pink leggings in the media.. but there is also a gathering backlash of people who very committed to making self ID happen.

I think the inertia on this will be calculated by main political parties in fact, it suits them to have activists not looking at government failures but endlessly fighting with each other instead. Keeping the threat of misogynistic gender identity-friendly policies dangling over women keeps us in our place if we start to ask governments for ‘too much’. In the same way dangling the distant promise in front of genderists that it will all happen in future, just wait it out and bide your time for the TERFs to move on to the next thing, also keeps the pro self ID camp voting for major parties, not scrutinising governments in favour of social media scrapping, and not publicly asking for ‘too much’… it’s very convenient isn’t it.

So definitely this issue is going to be the ongoing fight of our lifetimes whoever is in power.

So no, I’m not voting Tory because I don’t believe in food banks becoming essential to avoid starvation, my family and too many people I know are suffering daily from public services like the NHS, schools and local councils being starved of funds from central government. And i think ingrained child poverty is not inevitable. And we are all suffering from high energy prices and a housing crisis and an environment emergency left untackled. I mean, just to name a few. Oh and Brexit! And its social division and colossal waste of taxpayer money and its loss of opportunity and the tangible things that really affect individuals I know like constant medicine shortages.

Cameron, May, Johnson, Truss and Sunak have all been terrible for the country in different ways., and personally I believe we can’t afford more of the the same from the Tories. I can’t vote to reward it. The Tories don’t love gender critical women back. I am quite sure of that. This is just a convenient culture war for them. As it is with other potential governments. So vote how you want.

EdithStourton · 28/01/2024 10:03

@NecessaryScene 'ad locum' is genius - and also a very astute observation.

Plus a touch of Latin always improves a day.

Swipe left for the next trending thread