"Woman" in court for dumping soiled adult nappies at nurseries

[LaTricoteuseVieux]

Another man masquerading as a woman.

Dumping adult nappies at children's nurseries.

Sounds like a very troubled person 😔

I saw this in regional press a few days ago with similar reporting style - within 24hrs though it had been amended - see below

https://www.shieldsgazette.com/news/trial-set-for-defendant-accused-of-dumping-soiled-adult-nappies-at-south-tyneside-nurseries-4481050

So he's got a GRC by the looks of things. Did he have to actually see a Dr or therapist to get it? It strikes me he should be on the 'no' list for granting GRCs. Clearly unwell.

I don't imagine he'll get a custodial sentence but if he does, with a GRC I think they'd send him to a women's prison. Poor, poor women.

BTW- if a newspaper refuses to go along with this rubbish and correctly sexes someone, nothing will happen. They won't get fined, rapped over the knuckles - nothing. They are all choosing to go along with this shit. 😡

I'm baffled are they nappies they use or adult nappies they have stolen from elsewhere?

Oh my god that is DISGUSTING. 🤮

Im not sure that "officially changing your identity" means a GRA or they may not even be able to acknowledge he is male. It's more likely to be deed poll name change, documents etc I imagine.

A GRC

If “formally and officially having changed her identity” means a GRC as opposed to changing passport and driving licence details it’s a good demonstration that having a GRC doesn’t automatically mean “lovely person who just wants to pee”.

He's vile. And, of course, if it is a GRC all of his previous convictions will be hidden.

Taylor also pleaded not guilty to breaching a criminal behaviour order imposed by Nottinghamshire Magistrates' Court in April last year, by being within 10 metres of a nursery without reasonable excuse.

WTAF?

That ain’t no woman.

#NotOurCrimes

Apparently there's a lot more to it than is in this item. But it sounds too gross for me to go looking for it. The quantity suggests he's stolen them. I think he "interacts" with them as well.

He's been in trouble before for the same offences and seems to have a particular interest in Nurseries.

Reduxx has some more info but don't read it unless you want to feel like vomiting:

https://reduxx.info/uk-transgender-diaper-fetishist-charged-with-dumping-used-adult-diapers-outside-nursery-smearing-excrement-on-baby-bottles/

How has this crime been recorded in court records/police records and the ONS - as committed by a woman?

I'm baffled are they nappies they use or adult nappies they have stolen from elsewhere?

The used adult nappies are, it is alleged, his.

He is also alleged to have been “interacting” with the used children’s nappies in public view. I think “interacting” can only really mean one of two things. Either he was smelling them or he was using the nappies to ‘aid’ with wanking. Or perhaps both.

He is also alleged to have broken into the third nursery he’d targeted and smeared shit (his own, or from the nappies, one assumes) around the place. Which must have been genuinely terrifying for the (overwhelmingly) female nursery workers.

One can only guess how he’ll choose to escalate his behaviour if he’s not locked away for a decent stretch (assuming he’s found guilty etc etc etc). He’s already got form or he wouldn’t have had a, clearly completely useless, behaviour order imposed.

The icing on the turd here is that, if he genuinely does have a GRC, these crimes will be recorded as being committed by a woman.

I this the chap that was breaking in and leaving notes for staff asking them to baby him? Change his nappy, feed him an so on?

Maybe that was the previous appearance in Nottingham.

I heard somewhere the 'interacting with the nappies' was shitting on them, not sure if its true though.

I can't fathom what makes someone shit in nappies and dump them outside a nursery. It's absolutely vile. Like, how does that idea even come about? Sick.

Thing is he has a fetish involving shit, nappies, babies, feeding babies… he’s a fucking nightmare.

Freaking revolting 🤮

Needs putting down!

Although court listings used the name Martin Tarling, the Chair of the Bench, John Lee, asked Taylor if he preferred to be addressed by his “feminine” name and the defendant agreed.

Why on earth was the Chair of the Bench encouraging this? If he was listed in court by his male name, sporting a jeffing beard, why not continue to call him by his male name? Why pander to the criminal?

The endless pandering to warped minds while sane people are slung in jail and lose their jobs and get police visits for saying the emperor has no clothes.

What is this all really about? Everyone knows a massive beardy bloke in a baby doll nightie is not a woman and has nothing in common with women. Is it just a gleeful let out for torrents of misogyny that have been restrained since 1980s with the rise of feminism? How has this collective distortion of fact come about? Are there any good books that examine what is happening socially, that this has become so widespread and so entrenched in our social structure so quickly?

Oh get in the sea you abhorration. #notourcrimes

Sick fucker.

And now the law allows men like this, with zero checks, to legally be called women.

"Nothing is certain but death and taxes" and cutsie anime avatars on social media being male perverts.