And again for those who lack any perspective of the female child and teen development, it is rather common for girls to hate dresses, I did and still do. It is rather common to be good at sport, I was excellent at sports that at the time were, in reality limited to male only because of sexist discrimination, but I loved them over what were considered female sports. I even bowled boys out at cricket.
Still not a male. Despite saying exactly to my mum that I wanted to be a boy and I even had a boy’s name picked out. Still not a boy.
This article was posted as a gotcha to portray the govt education guidance as being harmful for children. Considering just how many women post on this board with similar experiences of gender dysphoria at the age that this child is recounting their experiences, I think that any male person using this female person’s experience in this way is purely politically motivated for progressing the transgender end goal that ultimately is about male people being accepted as ‘women’ because they demand it. It is a thoughtless attempt that is devoid of understanding about girls and women’s experiences.
The current guidelines do allow safeguarding for all children not just a select few.
Have we had any answer to the ultimate question? That of :
Who ultimately benefits from perpetuating the myth that not liking dresses, having interests that as sexistly considered ‘male’ and who suffers from gender dysphoria means that a girl is actually a ‘boy’? Who benefits from that past the asserted ‘that female individual’? Anyone want to posit an answer?