I think the issue here is that endometriosis has long been a woefully misunderstood condition and women’s pain has been ignored. This is one charity crying out for a CEO with one or all of the following:
a) medical / gynaecology experience
b) lived experience of endometriosis
c) experience running health charities
None of the above applies to Steph AFAIK. What does being CEO of a very biologically-female-specific charity do for Steph? Does Steph care about women and their pain? Or is this very female-centric role about validating Steph’s acquired gender identity?
I would feel better about this if it was a generic health charity for both sexes. I don’t have a problem with TW getting jobs with charities but something about this seems really off, particularly given Steph’s hostility towards those who don’t pander to gender-flip. I’m not sure Steph can be the best advocate for women living with endometriosis.