When I first came in to this whole subject, I found voices like KJK's too extreme (same with Glinner). I didn't want to listen because their delivery style sounded (to me) that it would be hurtful to those that believe that they have a gender identity and have gender dysphoria.
I have a totally different "style" to both of them but I also value them both hugely.
I appreciate this is a thread about KJK and not Glinner but I see them both in the same way on this. With both of them I share common ground that a) children are being harmed by all of the ways that gender identity belief is being compelled as a truth, particularly in schools and mental health care and b) transwomen don't belong in women's spaces, sports and associations.
KJK's voice in this is incredibly important and incredibly powerful. I'm really glad that she speaks up.
This has been posted on Twitter this week https://twitter.com/melliehellie42/status/1720361618528157903?t=KcWmkcYO2vhjcR63n_RgOQ&s=19 , where someone is trying to say that her views from 5 years ago (for those not on Twitter, it's a video with her saying that post-op transwomen might be OK in women's spaces) show that she is a "fraud". On the contrary, I'd say that it shows that her views come from a place of reasoned thinking, where she has a firm foundation as a decent and caring human being; that she's not being unfair or unreasonable. Like most/many of us, she's had a journey of awakening.
On a personal note, my one and only interaction with KJK on Twitter was about compelled speech. I said that a poster was free to use preferred pronouns if she wanted to, and that I did the same (never a child, and never where context is important) because I support each of us having our own free will. This was in response to a KJK comment, where KJK had explicitly told the poster not to use the transwoman's preferred pronouns. In response to my comment, where I said that it was a matter of freedom of choice, she told me that I was a part of the problem. I don't consider myself part of the problem at all - I'm using my voice in my own way. Some people shut down when she speaks and she pushes them away with her abrasiveness. Some people listen to her and it helps them a lot.
Personally, I think her format to Let Women Speak is much better in person and doesn't really translate to MN. I also really enjoy listening to her no-nonsense delivery when she is interviewed on TV. I should imagine that if she was here on MN arguing her (excellent) points, she would firstly be held back by the rules (i.e. she wouldn't be able to express herself as she'd want to) and secondly she'd risk alienating people (like me) if they try and interact on some of the nuances. I'm very comfortable in my own understanding of what is harmful in relation to gender identity belief and, while I'll accept that it's possible that I'm still on a peaking journey, I don't need to be whacked around the head with blunt comments telling me that I'm part of the problem.