Re the drudge work of leafleting etc, I was at the Miners Gala in Durham a few years ago and one of the local Labour (male) bigwigs made a speech (with all of the usual sentimental, backwards-looking celebration of the Labour movements of the past that seems to charcterise the Gala year after year) in which he spoke of all the heroism of the workers, striking, agitating, etc -- and the 'heroism' of their women who supported them with tea, etc.
That was truly how he saw women of the left. Incidental providers of support functions. Even though the female leader of the TUC was sat directly behind him.
The persistence of this dinosaur attitude towards women is one of the few things that I can get hold of to explain trades unionist mens' utter, blind inability to come to the support of gender critical women who are persecuting for seeking the preservation of sex-based rights and defintiions. It is a perfect point of sympathy between the old, corrupt grandees of the north east labour heritage and the new generation of leftist men, who are just as willing to let their own male entitlement blind them to women's reality and equal status - but 'progressively' much less willing to be honest about their male sense of entitlement.
Having been forced, for a brief few years of a flourishing culture of relative equality, to realise that women are actual real individuals - subjects not objects - it seems like men of the left have soothed their wounded narcissism by saying "OK, well if its no longer ok to possess women by confining them, by objectifying them, by viewing them as walking and talking projections of my own desires, then I should be able to claim their subjectivity, their newly acknowledged real personhood, as my own. It's only fair, otherwise I have an uncompensated loss, and they have somethng that I can't take.'