Ironically, Starmer will see any landside he gets next year as reward for his lukewarm take on women's rights butressed by his spin on trans rights.
In any sane world, the Tories would have either been looking after the country half decently meaning polls would be way closer, and Starmer would not be able to take women's votes for granted.
If he was just in the lead, and internal polling was telling him the trans issue was toxic for a large number of women, do we really believe he wouldn't be adopting a fully GC line?
It's only because his lead is so large he can feel confident in being so "bold" in ignoring women's concerns.
Rosie Duffield is being typically gracious in her comradely comments towards Phillips. But we all know she still feels badly let down. As do we all.
I'm a man with no skin in the game if Starmer opens up more numbers of men IDing as women. Nothing about my life, personal safety changes. I'm not a woman.
But as a person, a citizen and voter, he's insulted my intelligence, and my patience. Phillips is doing her best PR efforts to pour oil on troubled waters.
Those troubled waters aren't being calmed.