Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

(Un)scientific American: "ROGD is not a thing"

104 replies

BonfireLady · 31/08/2023 07:17

Apologies if there is already a thread and I missed it.

Scientific American has released an article saying that ROGD is "not a thing". From the article:
Evidence Undermines ‘Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria’ ClaimsFears of “social contagion,” used to support anti-transgender legislation, are not supported by science

A recent study claiming to describe more than 1,600 possible cases of a “socially contagious syndrome” was retracted in June for failing to obtain ethics approval from an institutional review board.

The article then goes on to "debunk" ROGD. Who could possibly believe that social contagion happens with teenage girls, right? But its main argument still remains that the paper didn't get ethics approval. Yes.... it does appear to be a problem that the scientific community don't like approving any research that challenges the affirmation only narrative.

If anyone has Twitter, any peer reviews and comments on this thread would be greatly appreciated.

https://twitter.com/BonfireLady/status/1697126765687099612?t=e7H4bZSheb5z8CdtkOTfnA&s=19

Link to the article:
Evidence Undermines ‘Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria’ Claims

https://twitter.com/BonfireLady/status/1697126765687099612?s=19&t=e7H4bZSheb5z8CdtkOTfnA

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
RealityFan · 03/09/2023 10:57

JellySaurus · 03/09/2023 10:45

Denying necessary medical care is abuse. You know that damn well, that's why you make up elaborate fantasies to deny the necessity...

Mastectomy of healthy breasts.

Unlicensed use of strong drugs known to cause severe, long-lasting consequences such as osteoporosis.

Prevention of brain and body maturation.

Use of drugs that cause such severe vaginal and uterine atrophy that major surgery is the only solution. Hysterectomy can result in prolapse and incontinence for the rest of the individual's life.

These interventions can result in sterilisation and the inability to orgasm. The earlier they are applied, the higher the likelihood that the individual will never experience pleasurable sex.

'Necessary medical care'?

Its "necessary" if you look thru the narrowest of lenses, ignore all the negatives, base decisions on at best, logical fallacies, and at worst, the most scurrilous lies. To realise a fantasy, perhaps a positive for the most outlier of outliers, a negative for the rest, and the imposition of expectation for the 99.996% of the population to mentally reverse engineer millions of years of sex based evolution, thousands of years of social and civic development.

In no sane analysis would you ever go "medicalisation of teens and overturning the sex based boundaries of women, yep, this is justified across multiple reasons".

Datun · 03/09/2023 11:53

Helleofabore · 03/09/2023 08:47

Sadly the poster was here the night before as well and used the same tactics. I think that they just came by for an attempt to continue to abuse Bonfire because Bonfire established boundaries and spoke of relevant personal experience.

Hence making the ideal target in the eyes of such a poster to come back and target again.

I suspect though that they read through the replies of either threads and realised that we just kept pointing out the abuse tactics and how that every post did indeed show male socialisation and male privilege and realised this place was a lost cause.

No one was going to bite back with some (desired?) retaliatory abuse and no one was going to affirm either. I guess it is pretty boring if you spent all that time poking and prodding and just got so little in return.

Yes, it seems pretty clear to me that the aim was just to abuse women. An end in itself.

And hopefully get a rise out of them as a result. They were largely deprived of that particular excitement.

These males don't seem to realise that they are just the latest in a really tediously long list of like minded misogynists who show up here fondly imagining they're unique.

ArabeIIaScott · 03/09/2023 12:01

Some of it seems like 'negging' to me. Just breenge in and fling insults about.

BonfireLady · 03/09/2023 22:56

Finally had time to sit and read everything properly. One of the things I've really appreciated since joining this board is just how much nuance and discussion we have on here. It's not just soundbites, it's something that takes time to both digest and respond to.

Well, I think it's fair to say that I can see no more value in directly replying to the insults and (frankly baffling!) accusations above. One thing I do think worth calling out though is that it's interesting how abuse is being framed. When "trans genocide" is written in long form like this, rather than just mantras, it's quite telling that there isn't actually any substance to it. I'm still empathetic that someone will feel angry and scared (and therefore lash out) when they feel under threat - but that doesn't mean the threat is real. My empathy wanes significantly though when someone can't recognise how their screeching (in written form) is coming across.

I'm glad that that the posts have stayed in the thread as it was interesting (at the beginning anyway, while there was still something to discuss) to explore whether there was a sensible challenge to the idea that the RO in the ROGD was a misnomer. I haven't seen anything to suggest that it is and the subsequent posts just demonstrate what happens when that becomes apparent.

@Rudderneck and @Diverze that all makes a lot of sense about puberty. In the past, nobody would have suggested that perhaps a person's distress at puberty was an indication that it was the "wrong" puberty. It's a very new phenomenon at a societal level and, as PPs have said, it's most often the adolescent girls that fall under social contagions in general.

I think a lot of what ends up as what we are calling RODG has it's origins in this kind of experience, which kids seem to believe is abnormal or a sign of something wrong, that needs to be fixed.
Maybe in part because parenting and school now doesn't much emphasize working through hard things. But mainly because they are being told that discomfort - and I mean really serious discomfort and upset - with the body is "dysphoria" rather than a totally normal part of adolescence that affects 90% of kids.

Agreed, but I do believe that there is value in unpicking it through the lens of gender dysphoria. The "gender" angle is only possible if you have a belief that gender identity is real, but we're at a point now where this belief has permeated so much in education and healthcare that it would be like King Kanute and the tide trying to hold it back. If children are told it is a "truth" they will explore their feelings about their body through this lens.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread