In the spirit that debate is better than no debate, I'm happy to continue the conversation. But if I get called delusional, demented or similar again (whilst simultaneously being told that I'm being disrespectful), this will be my final direct reply to you. If too many personal insults are thrown, posts often get deleted. Personally, I think it's better if the posts stay up where there is substance being discussed, but just like me, I'd imagine MNHQ has a tipping point. If there is more personal mud-slinging than actual discussion, what's the point in the post staying up?
@NotBadConsidering has said lots of great stuff already.
To add to that, there is a fundamental issue at play here: belief.
Being trans is not a belief, it is a biological fact.
I could easily counter that with "Sex being immutable is not a belief, it's a biological fact".
But if we both stay entrenched in those positions, rather than acknowledging that we each have a different belief (yes, I'm happy to state that it's my belief that sex is immutable and that I believe it because it's my conclusion from the evidence that I've seen) then we may as well be a Christian and an atheist arguing about the paternity of Jesus.
To borrow @NotBadConsidering 's words and add in one of my own (square brackets):
What is the point of trying to pretend ROGD isn’t real? It’s pretty clear cut: there are adolescents who have no [declared] distress or dysphoria prior to puberty then they develop that distress rapidly at the onset of puberty. What is there to gain by pretending this isn’t happening?
Irrespective of a difference of opinion in what has led to it, what's the point in denying the reality that there has been a huge uptick in adolescent girls presenting in gender clinics? Whether it was "hidden" or not before is largely irrelevant to the reality that it is happening. Unpicking why it is happening is paramount - and unpicking why is going to come down to how each of us interprets the evidence through the lens of our gender identity or sex immutability belief.
To pick up on a few specifics:
To put it simply, any transgender person you meet is almost guaranteed to suffer PTSD from childhood abuse, that's the level of abuse we're talking about.
I'm sorry to hear that you suffered from sexual abuse. There is consensus that many (not "almost always guaranteed" though) people who identify as transgender have suffered from this too. However, there is not consensus on causality when it comes to why someone who has been abused would also identify as trans. There are many published theories which don't agree with each other on the whether the chicken or egg came first. In general, people who believe in gender identity may tend towards what you're suggesting, whereas people who believe that sex is immutable may tend towards the idea that identifying as transgender is a trauma response - both sexual abuse and bullying can result in a trauma response.
The chicken and egg issue (being related to which belief someone has) will also apply to which way round someone may view whether a person is being "converted" from being gay to trans or trans to gay. It's notable that the Tavistock whistleblowers were worried that they were "transing away the gay". To be a clinician in such a clinic, presumably you'd have to believe in gender identity (otherwise you're helping someone to change their body to look like the opposite sex for no good reason), so if they are concerned about this, that warrants attention.
Thirdly being autistic has nothing to do with being trans.
The figures from the UK's GIDS clinic disagree with that. They were berated in court for their lack of data in general, but they did at least have data on this. Anywhere between 35-48% of children who presented to GIDS for gender dysphoria were autistic:
https://statsforgender.org/nearly-half-of-children-with-gender-dysphoria-scored-in-the-mild-moderate-or-severe-range-of-risk-factors-for-autism-spectrum-disorders/
These two links have more generic context around comorbidities, as well as providing stats and commentary on how many children are gay:
https://www.transgendertrend.com/current-evidence/
https://bjgplife.com/time-to-think-the-inside-story-of-the-collapse-of-the-tavistocks-gender-service-for-children-by-hannah-barnes/
And finally, I have never said or intimidated that transgender people don't exist. They do. Transgender people are people who believe in gender identity, have a distress or disconnect related to their gender (i.e. the sex that they feel they are) and their sex (that they believe was assigned at birth) and transition so that their body is "in alignment" with their feelings. All of my comments have been about addressing why ROGD can't be declared "not a thing", not about whether trans people exist. If it any of it was received that way and caused offense, I apologise. However, I won't apologise for holding a belief that sex is immutable.