Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Update from CF

1000 replies

DerekFaker · 07/06/2023 08:28

This sounds horrendous. How can the police do this.

And yes, it was exactly as we predicted in the previous thread.

Should a certain police officer pop up in this thread, please try not to get drawn into protracted, repetitive arguments with him. Please!

https://twitter.com/CF_Farrow/status/1666337645427847169?t=LWaRDewlk7r_8pVTdkE_tw&s=19

https://twitter.com/CF_Farrow/status/1666337645427847169?s=19&t=LWaRDewlk7r_8pVTdkE_tw

OP posts:
Thread gallery
25
DerekFaker · 08/06/2023 08:35

Also if you truly believe in free speech, that means ALL speech. Unless it tips over into credible threats, etc.

OP posts:
BezMills · 08/06/2023 08:37

yep. I have some friends with very strong religious beliefs who I love and admire. I just don't agree with everything that they believe in. Doesn't seem to matter to me.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 08/06/2023 08:38

DerekFaker · 08/06/2023 08:31

I think only supporting people whose views 100% align with yours is a dangerous road to go down,and is probably responsible for a lot of this mess in the first place.

Let's also not forget that religion is also a protected characteristic. If you truly believe in equality for all, you can't pick and choose.

It's not about whether I agree with CF. It's about how any money I give could be used for campaigning against abortion instead of paying her legal team. I would consider donating if my donation was ringfenced for her legal fees, but it's not.

DerekFaker · 08/06/2023 08:46

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 08/06/2023 08:38

It's not about whether I agree with CF. It's about how any money I give could be used for campaigning against abortion instead of paying her legal team. I would consider donating if my donation was ringfenced for her legal fees, but it's not.

That's fair enough. But it seems some people are backtracking from any sort of support, not just financial.

OP posts:
BezMills · 08/06/2023 08:47

I completely support you on that @VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia

It's your money, you're your own money captain! I'm supporting CF on here, by following the threads and occasionally posting (BUMP)
The details so far revealed, so far as they go, give me great concern.

DrLouiseJMoody · 08/06/2023 09:03

I'll ask if there's any way funds can be ring fenced for legals. I think her boss writes the e-mails. One problem is that she cannot use Crowdfunder because certain individuals report (a man boasted that he had mine removed) so she's using her employer's platform which is immune to complaints. I do get this concern about anti - abortion funding and will communicate it at least.

Right now my friend is en route to court. Can I ask that, at least for now, we support rather than discuss the views of CitizenGo or Caroline's politics until after the hearing at least? Whatever you think, she's a victim of some extraordinarily unjust and abusive behaviour.

SerafinasGoose · 08/06/2023 09:05

GailBlancheViola · 07/06/2023 22:25

I agree @Boiledbeetle. I find the extent of the powers of this order very sinister but would accept that it would be needed in very severe and extreme circumstances. There needs to be absolute proof that CF actions have met that very high bar because it must be a very high bar to impose this level of restriction on anyone. National Security, threat to life, terrorism, organised crime that level of threat, does Caroline present that level of threat? It sounds like the kind of draconian measure you would expect in countries such as China, North Korea or Russia - although Russia seems to have an unfortunate habit of those who disagree with the State to fall unexpectedly out of windows to their death which is one way to solve the problem I suppose.

Don't put ideas in their heads.

I'm not even fully joking.

BezMills · 08/06/2023 09:08

@DrLouiseJMoody

Fully with you. My thoughts are with Caroline today, what an absolute ordeal she's being put through. I hope we get some sunlight today.

SerafinasGoose · 08/06/2023 09:16

CF had no real recourse to other crowd funding platforms. The vexatious litigant has a track record of suing people and then removing their right to defend themselves by having their crowd funders shut down.

The treatment of Caroline also embodies the strange contradiction of the abuse of equality law on the asserted basis of upholding it.

I'll be following the outcome. Putting all political views aside this is the relentless harrassment of one woman by aggressive men's rights activists determined to go to any lengths to punish, silence and persecute women who dare to voice dissent.

Ofcourseshecan · 08/06/2023 09:19

dimorphism · 07/06/2023 09:32

Also, what about the children? And her husband? Do they not have a right to privacy and safeguarding - which the police having access to their home from 8am to 8pm is not.

And this statement 'he police officer says this:

I believe that while presenting a significant interference with the respondent’s privacy rights, it is an appropriate course of action in the circumstances.'

Is not at all reassuring. Couzens and Carrick were police officers - could they have made this decision about one of their victims? We know the police force has a misogyny problem. Can any police officer just decide someone's guilty and curtail their human right to privacy (and incidentally that of their family too) in this way?

God almighty, this gets worse and worse. Trying to turn Britain into a police state while not doing any actual policing, eg solving or preventing crimes. How do police justify this?

DerekFaker · 08/06/2023 09:19

Totally agree @DrLouiseJMoody . My thoughts are with Caroline today.

OP posts:
BaronessEllarawrosaurus · 08/06/2023 09:21

@DrLouiseJMoody im also thinking of Caroline this morning and wishing her luck.

RocketPanda · 08/06/2023 09:26

I'm thinking of Caroline this morning. I file her anti abortion views under I don't agree with what you say but I will defend your right to say it.
She is a Catholic if I recall correctly so I would think she would go in line with her religious teachings.

dimorphism · 08/06/2023 09:33

@DrLouiseJMoody Thank you for the updates and for supporting Caroline. Please let her know I'll be thinking of her today and hoping for actual justice for her, her children and her husband, not more misogyny and abuse.

I simply don't trust the police any more, they seem to often do the abuser's job for them, whilst failing to solve real crimes. Couzens and Carrick were a feature, not a bug. Lets hope the courts can curb the police's Stasi-like inclinations to punish women.

It simply makes no sense that Caroline is a sufficient risk (of terrorism or to someone's life) that this is warranted. None at all. Unless you think mean words to a man on twitter is equivalent to actual physical violence. Which seems to be the way we're going given rape is basically legal in this country, whilst women get arrested or visited by the police for saying things on twitter or being untoward about paedophiles.

I hope today restores my faith a little.

Felix125 · 08/06/2023 09:38

DerekFaker
DVPO's have been a very useful 'tool' in protecting people.
Are you against the use of these?

At the end of the day, its up to the court to make the decision if this order is to be put in place or not.

Ameanstreakamilewide
We don't know what the allegation is at this stage or who has made it. Suffice to say, there is no such offence of 'being mean' or 'hurty words' - so Caroline must have been arrested for a specific offence which is under investigation.

pickledandpuzzled
Statistics do not suggest CF is terribly dangerous. Churchgoing mothers who play the organ are statistically unlikely to be causing havoc, let alone actual harm. The same with Anglican priests and TV personalities, pop stars I guess.

But we can't assume what CF has or has not done here - because we don't know yet. We don't know what she was arrested for.

Do we just 'assume' and hope nothing further happens to the reporting person whilst the investigation progresses?

Disclaimer - I am using 'we' to mean me and most others on here. I acknowledge that some on here will know or have been told the details of the complaint and I am aware that Caroline may have access to this thread or indeed people close to her. I also acknowledge that the reporting person, OIC and direct witnesses may also read the thread and hence will not be included in the term 'we'.

Ameanstreakamilewide · 08/06/2023 09:43

Felix125 · 08/06/2023 09:38

DerekFaker
DVPO's have been a very useful 'tool' in protecting people.
Are you against the use of these?

At the end of the day, its up to the court to make the decision if this order is to be put in place or not.

Ameanstreakamilewide
We don't know what the allegation is at this stage or who has made it. Suffice to say, there is no such offence of 'being mean' or 'hurty words' - so Caroline must have been arrested for a specific offence which is under investigation.

pickledandpuzzled
Statistics do not suggest CF is terribly dangerous. Churchgoing mothers who play the organ are statistically unlikely to be causing havoc, let alone actual harm. The same with Anglican priests and TV personalities, pop stars I guess.

But we can't assume what CF has or has not done here - because we don't know yet. We don't know what she was arrested for.

Do we just 'assume' and hope nothing further happens to the reporting person whilst the investigation progresses?

Disclaimer - I am using 'we' to mean me and most others on here. I acknowledge that some on here will know or have been told the details of the complaint and I am aware that Caroline may have access to this thread or indeed people close to her. I also acknowledge that the reporting person, OIC and direct witnesses may also read the thread and hence will not be included in the term 'we'.

Except we do know who made the complaint.

We all do. Caroline and @DrLouiseJMoody have both been punished by this process by the same individual.

If you look in the dictionary for Vexatious Litigant - you'll see a picture of them.

BezMills · 08/06/2023 09:44

The hearing, if it is going ahead today, should be in progress right now. Hope to hear more about that, later this morning.

Felix125 · 08/06/2023 09:48

Ameanstreakamilewide

No you don't know - you are assuming at this stage. Unless you are Caroline, the reporting person or the OIC.

You will not know who the reporting person is. It might be the same person as before or it might be a completely new person.

Ameanstreakamilewide · 08/06/2023 09:49

We'll find out soon enough, won't we?

AlisonDonut · 08/06/2023 09:52

For someone who is against LGB, it seems pretty odd that her best friend is a lesbian.

HandBall · 08/06/2023 09:53

You were in my prayers today Caroline, may you feel no anxiety.

HandBall · 08/06/2023 09:54

AlisonDonut · 08/06/2023 09:52

For someone who is against LGB, it seems pretty odd that her best friend is a lesbian.

You can be religious and be friends with anyone who isn't, you can even marry an atheist.

IcakethereforeIam · 08/06/2023 09:55

I read about a bloke who discovered his mum, who lived alone had been a prolific internet troll, I think the Mccanns were targeted by her. I'm not suggesting* *this of CF. He found out after his mum killed herself after she'd been contacted by a reporter (TV or newspaper)

The reason I'm raising this is, so far as I'm concerned, whatever cf may or may not have done, it does not matter. She needs support. She has not done anything so heinous that it puts her outside of society's consideration. The complainant(s) obvously have their support and their cavalry. I don't see that offering a handhold to CF is casing any harm, even if we all wind up feeling like mugs when/if it all comes out.

Felix125 · 08/06/2023 09:59

IcakethereforeIam

I agree. And we do offer support to people under investigation. Probation services and offender management as well as other departments do this - much to the distaste of the public.

DrBlackbird · 08/06/2023 09:59

Putting all political views aside this is the relentless harrassment of one woman by aggressive men's rights activists determined to go to any lengths to punish, silence and persecute women who dare to voice dissent.

All I know about the case comes from MN threads. However, I can join the dots of a bigger picture in play and it is the control and silencing of women about their loss of SSSs on the one hand and the increasingly authoritarian state on the other viz use of the new policing bill to arrest non protesting people at the king’s coronation.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.