Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Anyone watching Panorama at the moment?

149 replies

endofthelinefinally · 15/05/2023 20:22

It is about ADHD rapid online diagnosis and very expensive drugs for all.

I wonder if anyone will join the dots and hear the bells and klaxons...

OP posts:
Zodfa · 16/05/2023 09:22

Just thought it might be helpful to point out that it's possible both to be angry at the scandal of NHS waiting times and at the same time angry at the scandal of private firms taking advantage of that to hand out wrong diagnoses for cash.

This really is exactly the same rubbish as we see with the "everyone who says they're trans is trans" stuff. It in no way invalidates a genuine medical condition to acknowledge that some people who might think they have that condition actually don't. Quite the opposite, in fact.

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 16/05/2023 09:24

Did the program focus on the gap in provision for ADHD assessment in the NHS?

When someone makes a documentary about that I will watch it too, with interest. That doesn't invalidate the content of this documentary.

I agree that there is a shortage of "biggger picture" documentaries about the NHS. Dramatic under cover investigation documentaries get more attention.

DysonSpheres · 16/05/2023 09:26

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 16/05/2023 09:24

Did the program focus on the gap in provision for ADHD assessment in the NHS?

When someone makes a documentary about that I will watch it too, with interest. That doesn't invalidate the content of this documentary.

I agree that there is a shortage of "biggger picture" documentaries about the NHS. Dramatic under cover investigation documentaries get more attention.

I'll accept that. Decent point.

endofthelinefinally · 16/05/2023 09:29

The programme did indeed focus, at the beginning, on the terrible state of the NHS, the waiting lists, the need for a proper psychiatric assessment and follow up, the fact that ADHD is a serious condition and that powerful drugs are used to treat it.
The point of the expose was what followed. The exploitation of vulnerable people by unqualified, greedy people.
It is worth watching the actual programme.

OP posts:
Catastrophejane · 16/05/2023 09:32

CoffeeYes · 16/05/2023 02:48

I watched the episode and I was horrified by how people are exploited. For a very large sum, people pay to do what is basically one of those online quizzes without any chance to elaborate. Then they pay a hefty amount for a private prescription for a serious drug that they might not actually need without proper consultation. That’s dangerous.

I’ve looked at ADHD symptoms and I’d say most people have quite a few of them (including myself), but they didn’t affect my grades at school and they don’t ruin my life everyday. I’m not sure why there’s this desperation for a label (unless it’s a child and their symptoms are negatively affecting their schooling and relationships). There are also other conditions that can seem like ADHD. Private diagnosis over Zoom or even in person really quick consultations without a full detailed evaluation should be banned.

But I think that’s the problem with ADHD ( and I’m a parent of a child with it). It is essentially diagnosed through looking at - in the case of adults- self reported symptoms.

you are right to point out that everyone exhibits these symptoms at times.
however, it’s the severity of these symptoms and the extent they affect your life which tips it into ADHD.

from what you’ve said here - you wouldn’t be diagnosed with ADHD.

despite all this I have problems with this documentary.

Im not sure what’s so shocking about the fact that if you go private, the bar is far lower for diagnosis and getting a prescription. They are making money from it.

there was no follow up about why people would feel the need to spend a fortune on diagnosis and drugs if the NHS actually provided help.

And even if people don’t have ADHD, they may have other mental health problems which are causing them to seek treatment. Why aren’t they being spotted by a GP?

HairyKitty · 16/05/2023 09:33

Again, every behavioural trait isn’t considered by private clinics (or anyone) to be indicative of adhd, and if that’s the impression the program gave, it was certainly very biased.

There need to be many traits, operating at a high/significant level (there’s a high threshold), which altogether must also significantly impact the individuals life.

LittleRedYarny · 16/05/2023 09:34

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 16/05/2023 08:24

personally think it was a poor biased piece of journalism focused on bashing the ND community on the basis of everyone wants a label as an excuse

The programme did it blame the people who use these clinics. Just warned them that the diagnoses aren't reliable and they may be wasting large amount of money. The blame is attached to the providers who profit from sloppy prcedures and overdiagnosis and to the NHS commissioners who don't oversee the providers properly.

you’re really not going to pay for one unless you’re really very sure.

Self diagnosis is not reliable. Other neurodiversities are available, with presentations that can overlap with ADHD. If this clinic is diagnosing everyone who comes along with ADHD, then not only are they misdiagnosing some neurotypical people, they are also giving the wrong diagnosis to people with autism and dyspraxia and prescribing unsuitable drugs to them at great expense instead of helping them manage their actual problems.

What the TV programme said, and what the DM says about a programme, are not usually the same thing. We can't go through life worrying about how the DM presents what we say.

tell me that the ND community doesn’t feel bashed. We really don’t feel helped because of this report - the complete opposite actually!

Yes, I can see some neurodiverse people feel bashed. But what do you mean by "the ND community"? How are ND people a "community"? Or do you just mean the ND people who belong to the same online groups you belong to, they are "the ND community"? Maybe there are other ND people who feel helped by the programme. You can speak for yourself but be careful when you claim to speak for a whole "community".

Just pop on the Panorama tweets and read the comments underneath- you’ll get a view from the ND community right there.

LolaSmiles · 16/05/2023 09:41

endofthelinefinally
Agreed. They also explained that there is a problem with social media blurring the lines between common behaviours that many people display and ADHD that had a substantial effect on someone's life.
The social media example they showed had someone linking ADHD to not always tidying up after yourself. Of course lots of adults don't tidy up after themselves all the time. It doesn't mean they have ADHD. Some of the content about ADHD recently online is similar to years ago where people would talk about being a bit OCD because you like a clean home and put your felt pens back in the packet in rainbow order.

The NHS specialist also said that whilst the journalist might do some things in some areas, there is a clinical threshold required for ADHD diagnosis that the journalist didn't meet.

Online providers focused on making money from people are likely causing harm by not properly investigating other ND aspects. They're not bothered about the patients. They're bothered about money.

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 16/05/2023 09:49

The programme did indeed focus, at the beginning, on the terrible state of the NHS, the waiting lists, the need for a proper psychiatric assessment and follow up, the fact that ADHD is a serious condition and that powerful drugs are used to treat it.

My apologies - I started watching partway through and missed that.

endofthelinefinally · 16/05/2023 09:51

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 16/05/2023 09:49

The programme did indeed focus, at the beginning, on the terrible state of the NHS, the waiting lists, the need for a proper psychiatric assessment and follow up, the fact that ADHD is a serious condition and that powerful drugs are used to treat it.

My apologies - I started watching partway through and missed that.

No need to apologise. At least you watched the programme.

OP posts:
WarriorN · 16/05/2023 09:54

ADHD doesn't have to be treated with medication. We seem to have done a sudden U turn there. A few years ago most were recognising the issues that medical intervention for children could bring. It can but should be trialled and adjusted under medical supervision. It can cause nasty side effects.

Many of the strategies used with dyslexic and autistic people really help with adhd. Add is a commonly ignored issue that in my experience often responds better to meds.

We also seem to suddenly be pathologising a lot of very common human traits. Adhd can be a force for good too - the teacher ICT with Mr P was diagnosed as a child.

Modern ideals of teaching and learning are not appropriate for many active children. Adults can have more choice in their careers and find one with a pace and demands / interests that suits them.

There's also a lot in our high tech environment that doesn't help those with Adhd and some think are leading some adults and children to develop symptoms. There's a book called "stolen focus" which looks at it all in depth.

The programme focuses on clinics making a lot of money giving people who are struggling what they want.

Incidentally, my experience of perimenopause has been extreme inability to focus. Hrt has definitely helped but I also know I have to regain some healthy habits that smartphone and mumsnet have rather destroyed.

NotHavingIt · 16/05/2023 09:55

MrsMikeDrop · 16/05/2023 03:00

The USA were quick to hand out ADHD diagnosis years ago, and it's not surprising when you see how much money the doctors and drug companies make from it. Ritalin and Adderall are the drug of choice for most young adults there. I'm always cynical when medication is quick to be suggested

They've been medicating every conceivebale childhood stress for many years in the U.S.A. I have an old college frined who moved to the U.S a long time ago and who has three children ( now all over the age of 18). Two out of her three childfren had been medicated by the time they were 12 years old. One supposedly for ADHD, and the other for anxiety and 'Oppositional Defiant Disorder'.

WarriorN · 16/05/2023 09:56

Somanycats why bullshit? NHS waiting lists are 4 years for a diagnosis and ADHD massively impacts a persons life, people loose jobs and relationships because of it.

I don’t think it’s bullshit to seek a diagnosis and support/medication through private means.

But it's clear that the companies aren't properly assessing their patients.

WarriorN · 16/05/2023 09:59

I have always had difficulty with attention and organisation. Monotropism. I chose a career that created a structure for me to adhere to. I've also now had close family members diagnosed with add. It has caused issues in my relationship, but mainly as I believe my husband is also that way inclined but sexistly expects me not to be.

However I've learnt a lot of strategies over the years and can't be arsed to chase a diagnosis after all the others I have.

NotHavingIt · 16/05/2023 10:01

endofthelinefinally · 16/05/2023 08:34

For those completely missing my point, the programme is about online charlatons exploiting vulnerable people, taking their money and selling them dangerous drugs without a proper, safe diagnosis.
Taking these drugs when you don't have a correct diagnosis can cause serious illness.
Those so called online psychologists do a quick tick box exercise and the doctor prescribes the drugs.

There really is a trend for people to self diagnose all sorts of conditions via on line forums and the like. PTSD is another one. People seem to need a label for their suffering. The problem is this then can become an almost essential part of their their psychic structure as well as their identity.

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 16/05/2023 10:02

I'm not sure what’s so shocking about the fact that if you go private, the bar is far lower for diagnosis and getting a prescription. They are making money from it.

Medical ethics still apply to private providers. The waiting time is shorter but there's no reason why assessments should be less thorough or why the bar for medication should be any lower.

Nily4567 · 16/05/2023 10:28

PurpleBugz · 16/05/2023 09:04

I have ADHD. I can see the point about how easy it is to get private diagnosis for adults because I did find it easy. ADHD has had long term negative effects on my life but because I don't present in the typical male way it was missed. I was diagnosed and medicated for incorrect mental health diagnosis. Worsening my life experience further.

I do not think private diagnosis for children is easy however. But I've not seen these done online. My child very definitely has ADHD the private clinician is sure but can't diagnose as he's got trauma from his school experience and the symptoms overlap. It's infuriating. I actually know of many parents that have paid privately and not got the diagnosis (and some I do feel should not have got diagnosed). The NHS wait is 4 years.

I'm seriously offended if someone were to say to me I just want the label. Live a week with ADHD as a woman then form your opinion.

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👍🏻

endofthelinefinally · 16/05/2023 10:29

Medical ethics SHOULD still apply to online providers.
I have had personal experience of what purported to be a bona fide medical cannabis clinic. (I have severe chronic pain). It absolutely wasn't and what was really disappointing was the number of doctors making money out of it.
There might be a few really good clinics, but how is the patient to know?

OP posts:
Nily4567 · 16/05/2023 10:32

Soontobe60 · 16/05/2023 09:11

Some people just love a label. Maybe it’s a form of Munchausen’s Syndrome?
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/munchausen-syndrome/overview/

Wow 😮 I am genuinely appalled

genuinely have a bloody good look at yourself - what an ignorant, unempathetic comment

wishing you a really sh*tty day and I hope karma bites you right right where you talk

Nily4567 · 16/05/2023 10:39

endofthelinefinally · 16/05/2023 08:34

For those completely missing my point, the programme is about online charlatons exploiting vulnerable people, taking their money and selling them dangerous drugs without a proper, safe diagnosis.
Taking these drugs when you don't have a correct diagnosis can cause serious illness.
Those so called online psychologists do a quick tick box exercise and the doctor prescribes the drugs.

Do you have ADHD? Do your children or family have ADHD? Do you know anything about ADHD?

I suspect the answers are NO, so why post this? Prejudice? Attention seeking? You were bored?? Genuinely a serious question. As I can’t picture why done one would sit and think, I know, here’s a subject I know nothing about and I have no connection to, wouldn’t it be a great if I popped onto the Viper’s Nest and shared my lack of wisdom??!?! 🤦‍♀️

endofthelinefinally · 16/05/2023 10:47

Nily4567 · 16/05/2023 10:39

Do you have ADHD? Do your children or family have ADHD? Do you know anything about ADHD?

I suspect the answers are NO, so why post this? Prejudice? Attention seeking? You were bored?? Genuinely a serious question. As I can’t picture why done one would sit and think, I know, here’s a subject I know nothing about and I have no connection to, wouldn’t it be a great if I popped onto the Viper’s Nest and shared my lack of wisdom??!?! 🤦‍♀️

To answer your first questions:
No
Yes
Yes.
Your second paragraph:
I explained previously that online clinics are exploiting vulnerable people, taking their money and
prescribing expensive, powerful drugs that can potentially do great harm.
I am glad I watched the programme because it has been a really useful warning.

OP posts:
ResisterRex · 16/05/2023 10:52

"Viper's nest"

Nice.

So there are genuine concerns about access to drugs in the wrong way, but when those concerns are given airtime, everyone is a Bad Person With Malicious Intentions for discussing those concerns. Moreover, nasty tropes about women discussing the news are brought out.

Got it.

LittleRedYarny · 16/05/2023 11:09

NotHavingIt · 16/05/2023 10:01

There really is a trend for people to self diagnose all sorts of conditions via on line forums and the like. PTSD is another one. People seem to need a label for their suffering. The problem is this then can become an almost essential part of their their psychic structure as well as their identity.

Please don’t make such reductionists statements as people uses labels in place of their identity. Perhaps people need a lable for their suffering to be taken serious and for them to get the much needed support to live.

Seriously we need to flip this idea of any kind of request mental health support/treatment as attention seeking. What is so fundamentally wrong with seeking attention?

Brienne Brown put it best when she said “we need to dispel the myth the empathy is walking in someone else’s shoes. Rather than walking in your shoes, I need to learn how to listen to the story you tell about what it’s like in your shoes and believe you even when it doesn’t match my experiences.”

LittleRedYarny · 16/05/2023 11:24

endofthelinefinally · 16/05/2023 08:34

For those completely missing my point, the programme is about online charlatons exploiting vulnerable people, taking their money and selling them dangerous drugs without a proper, safe diagnosis.
Taking these drugs when you don't have a correct diagnosis can cause serious illness.
Those so called online psychologists do a quick tick box exercise and the doctor prescribes the drugs.

I’m not sure people are missing the point. The point that I and others are making is that the reporting was poorly done. To many of us diagnosed this report just perpetuates the idea that ADHD is fake, especially if we’ve had a diagnosis under anything but an NHS clinician. That’s before we even get to the discussion about medication, particularly as modern day pills are slow release so we’re not doing it for a massive high.

Nily4567 · 16/05/2023 11:49

MN is widely known as the Viper’s Nest and for good reason - thank you for being the stereotype that proves the point….🤦‍♀️👍🏻🤭

Swipe left for the next trending thread