Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

KJK opposing fertility treatment for gay couples

510 replies

SapphosRock · 22/02/2023 14:10

KJK seems to have an ongoing beef with same sex couples having fertility treatment. Why? How is this benefiting women's rights?

Is is definitely not benefiting lesbian rights.

It also appears to be attracting all the homophobes on Twitter.

KJK opposing fertility treatment for gay couples
OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
SockGoddess · 22/02/2023 15:45

That’s not infertility 😂 Two men can be perfectly fertile and still not make a baby together, because thats nature. It’s the same reason a sock doesn’t get pregnant every time a man wanks into one!

OMG can you imagine all the pregnant socks sitting around and popping out more socks. Possibly the only thing that could make my house even more of a mess.

BordoisAgain · 22/02/2023 15:47

As others have said already, what KJK has said is fact.

Both women in a same sex relationship could be perfectly fecund, but they won't be conceiving any children together as neither of them produce sperm. Nothing to do with their fertility, just circumstance.

DonorMum · 22/02/2023 15:47

My child is donor conceived and there is nothing wrong with my fertility. They're totally different things.

And I don't think my choice of how I conceived my child should be state funded either. It was my choice (and one that I know quite a lot of people don't agree with). And that's fine.

It doesn't mean they're homophobic or that they think single women or lesbian and gay couples shouldn't be parents either.

Helleofabore · 22/02/2023 15:48

SapphosRock · 22/02/2023 15:39

Of course not but KJK isn't talking about egg donation.

She is saying two women trying to conceive isn't a fertility issue. A very easy (and tone deaf) thing for a heterosexual woman with children to say.

Have you ever asked her whether she meant 'sperm donation', Sappho?

Honestly, we have discussed this before. Have you since asked her? And have you asked whether she is specifically talking about 'anonymous' sperm donation or sperm donation where there is knowledge of the male parent or plans to allow knowledge as an adult?

Have you engaged with her about this?

Because as we have been through this before, where is the evidence she means sperm donation as well? Or is this just more speculation from people who have a sin page still published on their website about this?

Signalbox · 22/02/2023 15:48

SapphosRock · 22/02/2023 15:05

KJK is just being factual but the Tweet is extremely tone deaf to all the lesbians who have taken out huge loans and remortgaged their houses to be able to afford fertility treatment while straight couples are routinely offered it for free.

Not being able to conceive with the person you love is very much a fertility issue.

And no it's not just a case of finding a sperm donor and a syringe, it is a lot more complex than that.

If a woman's husband had no sperm would she just pop out and find a donor and a syringe? Or would they seek proper medical fertility assistance.

I’m wondering what it is you think “fertility” means? Do you think a single woman who wants a baby outside of a relationship has fertility issues? If lesbian couples have “fertility issues” (in absence of any medical problems that might prevent them from becoming pregnant) presumably you must also think this applies to single childless women. Or is it the being in a relationship with “the person you love” that creates the infertility?

OhHolyJesus · 22/02/2023 15:48

This is a women's rights issue. A really important one.

Now I'm really confused. Infertility is a woman's rights issue how? Men can be infertile and there is no human right to have a child.

It's not a woman's rights issue, it's not even a human rights issue.

The question about access to fertility treatment for same sex couples or single men and women could have been posed without using KJ's tweet.

ThePopesSecretary · 22/02/2023 15:48

FOJN · 22/02/2023 15:23

Ah yes, of course stating facts make's her responsible for other people's homophobia. Go take it up with KJK, I'm sure she is more than able to give you an answer but that isn't really the point of this thread is it.

Oh, come on, now! You can agree with people on one thing and disagree with them on many others. They're not mutually exclusive!

The tweet is clearly not particularly friendly towards homosexual couples (of either sex)! In fact I find it quite reactionary.

I'm not even referring to the fertility treatment bit - it's the sweeping statement that children are best off (zero ifs and buts) growing up with one mother and one father in a heterosexual relationship!

It is rather offensive!

Now, I absolutely do believe in the right to cause offense, so: more power to her in that respect! But I happen to vehemently disagree, and it's not somehow "pro trans lobby" or anything to not defend her on such stuff. Or the abortion statements, for that matter!

FuckNuggets · 22/02/2023 15:50

SapphosRock · 22/02/2023 14:35

Why Tweet about it at all? Seems like KJK taking a swipe at lesbians. The comments are certainly very anti-lesbian.

She Tweeted it this afternoon.

Lesbians in the comments agree with her. She's being factual.

KJK opposing fertility treatment for gay couples
Shamoo · 22/02/2023 15:51

Her tweet is obviously factually correct. Regardless of her intent, it is also obvious that her tweet is going to be jumped on by homophobes. Presumably that’s a risk she’s ok to accept.

Happylittlechicken · 22/02/2023 15:52

Er… @SapphosRock do you realise the hoops “straight” couples have to jump through to get fertility treatment? It’s not just “routinely offered for free”. Seriously. 🙄. The tests, the treatments, the counselling, then put on an extremely long waiting list. And if one of you has a child already, even if it’s not together… forget about it. And then you get 2 or 3 attempts if you’re lucky.

Floisme · 22/02/2023 15:52

ThePopesSecretary · 22/02/2023 15:48

Oh, come on, now! You can agree with people on one thing and disagree with them on many others. They're not mutually exclusive!

The tweet is clearly not particularly friendly towards homosexual couples (of either sex)! In fact I find it quite reactionary.

I'm not even referring to the fertility treatment bit - it's the sweeping statement that children are best off (zero ifs and buts) growing up with one mother and one father in a heterosexual relationship!

It is rather offensive!

Now, I absolutely do believe in the right to cause offense, so: more power to her in that respect! But I happen to vehemently disagree, and it's not somehow "pro trans lobby" or anything to not defend her on such stuff. Or the abortion statements, for that matter!

Which tweet are you talking about because you appear to be conflating JJKs tweet with the person retweeting her?

mrshoho · 22/02/2023 15:53

Yes this would be artificially assisted reproduction rather than infertility.

For 2 Males this means surrogacy
For 2 females sperm donor and iui or ivf.

KjK is quite right.

OhHolyJesus · 22/02/2023 15:53

The law dictates that any donor child in the UK (NHS or private) can access details of their donor when they turn 18.

Only if they are donor conceived with a donor who has ID release. Check out the donor conception board for more on this.

There are children living in the U.K. who will not have access to that information by law, they may never know who donated gametes to conceive them. It relies on ID release and the laws of where the gametes originated from.

FOJN · 22/02/2023 15:53

ThePopesSecretary · 22/02/2023 15:48

Oh, come on, now! You can agree with people on one thing and disagree with them on many others. They're not mutually exclusive!

The tweet is clearly not particularly friendly towards homosexual couples (of either sex)! In fact I find it quite reactionary.

I'm not even referring to the fertility treatment bit - it's the sweeping statement that children are best off (zero ifs and buts) growing up with one mother and one father in a heterosexual relationship!

It is rather offensive!

Now, I absolutely do believe in the right to cause offense, so: more power to her in that respect! But I happen to vehemently disagree, and it's not somehow "pro trans lobby" or anything to not defend her on such stuff. Or the abortion statements, for that matter!

I agree. It's a good job that the tweet you are referring to wasn't posted by Kelly Jay. I hope we can also agree that as she didn't write it she is not responsible for the homophobia contained within it.

OhHolyJesus · 22/02/2023 15:55

Through a clinic

A U.K. clinic yes. I recommend the BBC Podcast called Male Order for arrangements made with sperm donors outside of HFEA regulated clinics.

Zippidydoda · 22/02/2023 15:55

From what I know of her she is very strong on stating things that are fact, without dancing around them.

You referring to her as being “tone deaf” however I suspect she would view it as just stating a fact.

I think if people are upset at being told that two people of the same sex can’t biologically reproduce then the issue is with them and the way they are dealing with reality. Most people simply accept this.

Clymene · 22/02/2023 15:55

Yes @SapphosRock - why have you included a quote tweet in your OP?

Really it's a bit pathetic of you

SapphosRock · 22/02/2023 15:55

I’m wondering what it is you think “fertility” means? Do you think a single woman who wants a baby outside of a relationship has fertility issues? If lesbian couples have “fertility issues” (in absence of any medical problems that might prevent them from becoming pregnant) presumably you must also think this applies to single childless women. Or is it the being in a relationship with “the person you love” that creates the infertility?

I am talking about gay equality. If you support lesbians having equal rights then you would support the NHS treating them the same as heterosexual couples.

The NHS does not offer surrogacy and I don't believe it funds IVF for single women. It does fund donor sperm IUI and IVF for male factor infertility in straight couples. Therefore if you believe lesbians should have equal rights the NHS should fund donor spend IUi and IVF for lesbian couples.

Therefore two women being unable to procreate IS a fertility issue.

OP posts:
MrsTerryPratchett · 22/02/2023 15:56

Floisme · 22/02/2023 15:52

Which tweet are you talking about because you appear to be conflating JJKs tweet with the person retweeting her?

Which may have been the intent. I find the whole thing very suspicious.

Argue with her in good faith. I don't agree with everything she says. I don't agree with everything anyone says, including myself.

OhHolyJesus · 22/02/2023 15:58

Shamoo · 22/02/2023 15:03

Lesbians can also have fertility issues. Please see my five miscarriages.

I'm very sorry to hear this, reoccurring miscarriage must be horrific and exhausting. No infertile/miscarriages are caused by being same sex attracted and the methods of getting pregnant available to you are obviously more expensive and less impulsive than a heterosexual relationship.

SapphosRock · 22/02/2023 15:58

Happylittlechicken · 22/02/2023 15:52

Er… @SapphosRock do you realise the hoops “straight” couples have to jump through to get fertility treatment? It’s not just “routinely offered for free”. Seriously. 🙄. The tests, the treatments, the counselling, then put on an extremely long waiting list. And if one of you has a child already, even if it’s not together… forget about it. And then you get 2 or 3 attempts if you’re lucky.

Yes lesbians have to go through all that too. The difference is straight couples are offered between 1 and 3 rounds of IVF on the NHS. Lesbians have to fund it themselves.

OP posts:
FOJN · 22/02/2023 15:58

I am talking about gay equality. If you support lesbians having equal rights then you would support the NHS treating them the same as heterosexual couples.

Does the NHS give free fertility treatment to hetroexual couples who don't have a diagnosed fertility problem? If the answer is no then you are being treated equally.

catandcoffee · 22/02/2023 15:58

It's just a fact she's stated that technically is correct.

Rainbowshit · 22/02/2023 15:59

FOJN · 22/02/2023 15:58

I am talking about gay equality. If you support lesbians having equal rights then you would support the NHS treating them the same as heterosexual couples.

Does the NHS give free fertility treatment to hetroexual couples who don't have a diagnosed fertility problem? If the answer is no then you are being treated equally.

This^^

Shamoo · 22/02/2023 15:59

OhHolyJesus · 22/02/2023 15:53

The law dictates that any donor child in the UK (NHS or private) can access details of their donor when they turn 18.

Only if they are donor conceived with a donor who has ID release. Check out the donor conception board for more on this.

There are children living in the U.K. who will not have access to that information by law, they may never know who donated gametes to conceive them. It relies on ID release and the laws of where the gametes originated from.

As I clearly said very quickly in the follow up post, I was referring to treatment through the NHS or a UK fertility clinic. Where, by law, in the UK the donor has to be ID release. That doesn’t depend on the country the donor came from - for example, sperm can be donated in the USA without being ID release, but that cannot be purchased in the UK for use through the NHS or a fertility clinic.

The post I was replying to suggested heavily that the NHS could provide treatment using anonymous sperm. That is not correct.

I can assure you I’ve spent plenty of time on the donor conception board.

Swipe left for the next trending thread