I think sometimes people look at a transwoman who passes (and I think India can sometimes pass, with some very careful photography and if you can't hear the voice) and think job done. They forget that this person had to have their penis operated on and inverted and then had to dilate for hours a day for months on end. This person has to purchase/get a prescription for oestrogen because their own body will never produce the amounts needed to feminise. Then there's the vast amount of hair removal treatment, the facial surgery that involves sawing down brow and jawbones, the attempt to talk like a woman, often in that offensive falsetto. The decision about whether to freeze sperm. The sheer effort and technology and medicalisation that goes into attempting to replicate what a woman does naturally (whether she be Myra Hindley or Mother Theresa). Obviously you get the odd woman who goes down the obsessive plastic surgery and makeup route but it's not about passing as a woman.
And another thing that fucks me off is the downplaying of the biological processes that can't be aped by men. That insistence that they have periods "just not the bleeding bit" as though the bleeding is nothing. As someone who has bloodied a few chairs, the arrogance of it never fails to astound me, and yet it is so typical of the male default. The claim that "cis women are infertile too" often said by a transwoman who has fathered or had the capacity to father children. India will never need an abortion or menstruate or give birth. India will never have ovarian or cervical cancer.
And India's reaction to Karen Ingla Smith when they went on telly together to debate several years ago (he basically said, "I feel sorry for the men" when they were discussing murdered women) suggests he knows all this on a fundamental level.