Keir Starmer sides with Nicola Sturgeon on gender law

[lechiffre55]

It looks to me like he's either changed his mind, or is playing fast and lose with what the word "sex" means.
I'm guessing that Starmer believes people can change sex. So single sex spaces and attraction are not affected because you can identify as whatever sex you want.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11651245/Keir-Starmer-sides-Nicola-Sturgeon-Scottish-gender-law.html

😬at pp segue into fish on here. Desperate times

Human beings aren't fish.

Already been done.

I suggest having a look at animal classification. There are some quite good explanations for schoolchildren

jgw1 · Today 15:16

The post I was replying to didn't specify mammals.

It could be worked out, of course. Marsha said "you can't change sex," which obviously refers to humans and not clownfish. Are you a clownfish?

And your point is what?

Muddying the waters with yet another irrelevancy?

I mean If a school of cod has joined the Labour party then fair enough, oh and suddenly fish can vote!

The post I was replying to didn't specify mammals.

So you read the OP that mentions single sex spaces and the person's post you responded to that said 'you can't change sex and males shouldn't be in single sex spaces' and you thought ''oh, they must be referring to all those fish trying to access women only spaces''?

While we’re on fish, isn’t it about time they got the right to vote? You know, universal suffrage innit 🤷‍♀️

And if fish got the right to vote they might eventually identify as humans and then we'd have to figure out a way to let them into human-only spaces. I guess we'd all have to be kind and all the humans would have to go around wearing scuba equipment because obviously we wouldn't want the poor fish to be unable to breathe when we could just make this small accommodation.

Fish in women's single sex spaces next.
"I identify as a fish that can breath out of water"

Shark here, I've been secretly voting for years.

And you never noticed nah nah na Nah na

Haha at this although too at pp

This with bells on

Silverfish are Fish!

Six legged wingless fish...

This could lose him the election. I won't vote for any person who does not know what a woman is or allows men into female spaces or sports events.

Lol the bat signal went out early on this one!

This is the same line he’s been fudging from day 1 on this

He’s a lawyer & he knows that the EA doesn’t confer automatic rights of admission to single sex spaces even with a GRC - he knows this!

as always he’s hoping no journalist will know the law and so be able to challenge him

lets see how much he holds his “I agree with NS line” in 2 years time when there’s an election

He imagines that supporting GRA will get Labour support in Scotland, too dim to realise how hugely unpopular GRA is among Scottish voters.

He's likes to say how dreadful the Torie's maths is yet tries to appease less than 1% of the population over the 51% 🤷🏻‍♀️.

Which is a lie. We can and do deny access to men with a GRC.

Whenever someone brings up fish in relation to Women’s Rights, it always reminds me of Angelina Jolie in Shark Tale.

I won’t be voting Labour in the next GE, I’ll spoil my ballot.

I'm shocked at how Labour MPs have treated women's rights in this debate and it doesn't fill me with confidence once the Labour party is in.

Do we need a change? Yes, but Labour won't be any better Meanwhile women's rights and sensible debate becomes dismissed as transphobic.

I don't get it. The GRR reform is clearly so unpopular to the average Joe. If Labour MPs are behind even this then how will any change happen anytime soon?

I think it's factions within his own party that he's trying to appease rather than the electorate. He might be the leader but he doesn't look like he's in control unfortunately.