“I’m aware I have other traits and attributes to other female riders, but they aren’t so widely different that it makes competition unfair," she said
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Let’s see it, then. Rather than just stating something, prove it. Because that evidence is huge, given that by definition it would have to undo our entire understanding of sexual dimorphism, physiology and the very foundation of and reason for having womens sports in the first place. That’s some meaty fucking evidence, and I’d definitely like to see it. Demonstrate to me that any cohort of male bodied people can be proven not to have meaningful physiological advantages over females, and let’s weigh that up in terms of what it does and doesn’t tell us about fairness in sport. You’ll need three groups- male to trans people, males who do not identify as trans, and women (no identity need be specified). Run those comparisons. Show us the data.
At the moment, all you seem to be driving towards proving is that you’re not that good of a cyclist compared to other males, your identity is paramount, whatever you say about your performance should be regarded as gospel, and for those reasons you must be allowed to compete with women.
Nope.