I guess when you're someone who advocates for letting men into women's prisons you have to try really really hard to find some way to make anyone look morally worse than yourself.
So you have to do things like say "holocaust denial" a lot.
It's a weird sort of whataboutism - "okay, a lot of women might get raped in my plan, but don't think about that - think about the holocaust, it's not as bad as that".
But even then it doesn't work because even a holocaust denier isn't actively supporting an ongoing holocaust, unlike those who are actively supporting putting men into women's prison's now.
Those like ELO supporting that are directly supporting an immediate ongoing crime against humanity.*
They don't get to have any moral high ground by being concerned about previous ones.
"Okay, so I'm doing this to you, but I feel really bad about what happened to those other people. Don't go asking her for help - she once stood next to someone who thinks that other thing didn't happen. So I'm just going to keep doing it. Shut up."
Totally normal non-psychopathic behaviour.
*(Yes, sorry, women do count as humanity. Sorry to be pedantic about this.)