I'm interested in how combative you are determined to make this. Determined to make it about your side and my side. You want to play Oppression Olympics and that's such a regressive, counterproductive, self-serving, unintelligent approach to this. It's also a daft move on your part, because if you did tot up attacks on GC women by TRAs versus attacks on TRAs by GC women, you'd lose Oppression Olympics by miles.
I've never wished harm on trans people. Indeed, I think additional third spaces that have nothing to do with sex or gender will help make them safer because it won't matter if they don't "pass" and if they just want a safe place to wee or change that doesn't mark out their natal sex, there it is. JKR and Parker have never wished harm on trans people either. Indeed, in her famous essay, JKR explicitly acknowledged that trans people are vulnerable to male violence and empathised with a transwoman who had suffered a horrific attack, in a paragraph that still fills my eyes when I read it. She knows what that's like. So do I.
But it is an absolute fact that a certain, very loud branch of TRAs are using threats against women in a way women simply aren't using them against trans people.
The attacks you're talking about are almost exclusively by men. Dangerous men who need to be barred from female spaces, but under your ideology, would have full access and women who object would be the oppressors.
Because you are determined to be combative and play Oppression Olympics, you are trying to suggest that it's mostly women sending threats and so on. It so patently isn't that it's making you look too foolish, and blinded by anger and combativeness, to engage with.
GC women are aware that the problem is dangerous men. You think that the problem is non-consenting women who won't shut up.