Genuinely interested to hear what supporters of gender ideology would recommend here.
This is not really a forum awash with gender ideologists so you may get a different perspective.
I am biologically female but do not identify as a woman. I am officially trans though in reality I don't think I am the sort of person Stonewall meant to refer to in their definition of trans (I am gender critical - which for those who have been misled by some made-up definitions, to me means that sometimes sex, rather than gender, matters. It is not an anti-trans stance).
Being trans and GC are not incompatible, many people believe some people have gender dysphoria and may wish to transition whilst also being gender critical. Debbie Halton is an example of a transwoman who believes in biological sex.
You are correct to state sex matters and this is a legally protected belief which is not anti-trans. How people manifest this belief may or may not be a anti-trans.
The question is - which facilities should I use? I should not be in the ladies if that is defined by identity but using the men's does not feel right either. How do gender ideologists suggest I negotiate this?
I am not a gender ideologist, I believe sex is binary Male and Female but I also believe people should live their best lives without artificial barriers being put in the way.
Society has developed a language which can be precise but can also be very confusing. Do you have dinner at mid day or in the evening, do you have a sofa or a settee, is it a napkin or a serviette. In each case we may use one word but we still understand when someone uses a different word.
Female words for toilet I have seen include women, ladies, damen, hens, mares, signore, Donne, femmes etc. I am not a horse but definitely knew to use the mares not stallions. To me these words are saying is this is a single sex facility for females.
Not at all. Im not confortable with the mens because I don't identify as a man. I am non binary also according to stonewall definition. I've borne two children so am legitimately biologically female. However I'd feel mis gendered if anyone assumed that because I go to the ladies I identify as a woman. I am not messing here. I genuinely now feel uncomfortable wherever I go.
This is a where subtlety of language really comes into play, would you feel miss-sexed if someone assumed you were female because you used the ladies toilet?
What you need to remember is most communication is non-verbal, if I met you I may misgender you not because you used the female toilet but because of how you presented to me e.g. clothes, hairstyle. If I met you and you asked me to use they/them pro nouns I would, if you then said I’m going to the loo and walked into the women’s I wouldn’t think twice about it.
I'm agender not trans male
This is how I meant it though as well as a thought experiment I do not ever want people to feel justified in assuming that I align myself with sexist stereotypes just because of the facilities I use.
As a thought experiment, do you assume people who use the mens toilets are rapists, sexual offenders because 98% of rapists and sexual, offenders are male? Was I racist in China because I only used the “western toilet” rather than the hole in the ground Chinese toilets?
Sorry for the I am trans confusion but according to stonewall anyone who does not have a gender identity is trans
- That is one view/definition many would disagree with.
- I don’t have a gender identity
- I believe if you asked people most would actually not understand the question and so state man or woman meaning male or female not understanding what gender ideology is.
Gender ideologies do not agree and I want to know which facilities they think I should use
If gender ideologies don’t agree then it is impossible for them to have a consensus. Which means using the toilet facilities designated for your sex is the right approach.
Also why do you care what other people think of you using the toilets appropriate for your sex?
Gender ideologistsn say they are womens toilets not females. And some tw describe themselves as biologically female. By their definition I am not a woman and may also not be female.
As I’ve said language is part of the issue. Relabelling toilets female and male makes it clear they are sex based facilities. This would remove any ambiguity.
Perople can describe themselves how they want, cat, Jedi, TW, etc. but this does not change the material reality of their biological sex.
Groups and organisations can create their own definitions and it is up to us as individuals and society to decide if we accept or reject them. It is your choice to accept or reject gender ideologies definitions, if they can agree one!
Whilst sex and sexual orientation are clearly defined in law the same cannot be said for trans, non-binary etc. To resolve this we may need more legal definitions but this is something gender ideologists don’t want, I wonder why?
Sadly gender ideologists do
I am absolutely not taking the piss. I am wanting gender ideologists to tell me where I fit in their worldview.
Gender ideologists can’t tell you where you fit in their world view because they can’t agree. Only you can decide where you fit in your world view.
To me it feels like a refusal to let my sexed body define me. What does it feel like to identify as a woman?
I haven’t a clue how to tell you what it feels like to be a woman, I just am a woman.
I am a woman and my sexed body does not define me. Yes, there are things I can’t do but very few are because I am a woman. There are things that impact me because I’m female e.g. periods, pregnancy, childbirth, PCOS, menopause etc. but they don’t define me.
To me what you are saying is you reject sexual stereotypes and that is what many women and men do but don’t feel they need to stop being a man or woman to do that.