@FemaleAndLearning - I’m baffled, I had a look at that website, and the whole point of the program is the following:
“This dedicated career development opportunity aims to address the lack of women in technical leadership positions across the sector..”
and yet it is open to ANYONE who identifies as female.
@ThrowingSomeCrumbs - presumably he wants to be seen as a man, and you say looks like a man, so will want to use the men’s loos? Obviously, would need to use a cubicle.
If the same trans-man came into the ladies loos saying that they had been harassed or made to feel awful by another man in the male loos, I would probably leave them to use our loos, and go and get security if wanted etc.
But you and I both know your “friend” is a red herring. And has nothing to do with women who are still women but consider themselves agendered, or non-binary.
Unless using women’s loos is somehow triggering, I don’t understand why females would want yet another kind of loo to use, if no one else can tell the difference.
This reminds me so much of the white academic who got into black spaces and even when finally called on it, insisted she was whoever she choose to be (“identified as”). That was clearly ridiculous, and insulting to WOC. Why do women have to accept everything that men want, without demure, because they have truly honestly realised they identify as women too…? because they are still being patriarchal.
When was the last time you heard of any man asking a woman what it felt like to be a woman in their quest for self-discovery? Never, that’s when. Absolutely no interest in the female perspective, only their own interpretation of being a woman. Which is the most reductive crap I’ve ever heard.