Again, I didn't say that. And I didn't call you stupid but I can if we need to go there. I am not stupid. For instance "stated" means that someone has actually stated something. I haven't stated that and for you to say that I have is deceitful.
Im talking more generally than you here, though you are illustrating the point very well.
Boston Children's Hospital has not admitted to performing hysterectomies on minors.
A member of staff (in fact was it two?) said they were, on an audio recording. It was also referenced on their website, though i believe they have changed it since. However screenshots exist.
So, with this in mind, what are you arguing?
-
There can be absolutely no truth in this (despite evidence provided by they themselves).
-
Even if we can't 100% guarantee there's no truth in it, our impeccable left leaning credentials mean we should stay out. If children are ultimately harmed by this decision, they are collateral damage and not as important as maintaining our purity.
-
There may well be truth in it, but we're fine with that. If underage hysterectomies are advancing the trans cause, then let's go for it?
Which is it?
Because from everything you've said on here, it looks like 2 to me.